Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Payday uk sold debt to prac ( bw legal )


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2607 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just recieved a letter from payday uk

 

Stating account number

New reference and balance due

 

Sold to prac finacial limited recently

 

We have not been made aware of any valid reason why the balance has not been paid and PRAC financial limited are now the legal owners of the debt. Prease dorect all payments and corespondence to PRAC

 

Any questions etc contact prac

 

 

In the same envelope a letter from bw legal

 

Our client PRAC ltd

 

Original creditor payday uk and orginal account number

 

Representing prac. And enclise correspondence confirmibg that our client has aquired the debt you previously owed to instant cash ltd / t/a pay dau uk.

We would also like to bring to your atenyion that only our client can now give full discharge of this debt and you should now only contact us about your account

 

Then goes onto payment methods

 

Then great news lol

 

We are delighted that for the next 28 days we can offer you a 10 % discount and your new balance would be £***.**. All you have to do is set up a payment arrangement with us within the next 28 days. Act now as this offer is only available untill 27th march 2017 after which it will no longer be available and the full balance will remain due.

 

If you settle your discounted balance in full our client will update your credit file and your pay day uk account will be marked as settled. If you pay by instalments our client will update your credit file accordingly each month

 

 

 

Letter 3 in same envelope

 

Original creditor payday uk

Ac number

Balance due

 

We are writing to inform you that we have acquired the above bedt from instant cash loans ltd T/a payday uk

 

We enclosed a copy letter from instant cash loans ltd T/a payday uk confirming our ownership of the debt

 

Only prac financial limited may now give valid discharge of this debt but have apointed bw legal services ltd as our representatives

 

By wahy of introduction we are a specialist debt purchaser. We take the aproach that we would prefer to work with you in order to agree a suitable repayment agreement based on your financial circumstances rather than having to take formal action

 

We there fore strongly urge yo to take this oportunity to deal with your outstanding liability by by discussing a suitable repayment with our representatives bw legal who are instructed by us to discuss affordable proposals for repayment with you

 

 

Any tip , advice on the above ?

( apart from paying as i know thats one way to get rid of this )

 

Info needed

More info from them ?

 

Got quite a bit of money going out at the moment and we are struggling with aby extra debt

 

Any advice aprrciatex and taken on board

 

Thanks

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlife dca threat-o-gram

 

They are not bailiffs

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlife dca threat-o-gram

 

They are not bailiffs

 

Thanks for reply

 

Ignore . Do nothing ?

Do i send them a letter requesting anything ?

Arange payment plan etc

 

Just trying to sort things realy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arh the combination of PRAC / BW Legal and Instant Cash Loans...

Considering it si BW Legal my own advice would be not to ignore.

 

Remember this is the firm who tag teamed with Lowell to issue Stat Demands like confetti - I am currently dealing with them on a fraudulent account and even when they are given proof, references and even a formal letter before action;

They still claim that its owed. (This letter before action they responded to below;)

 

We are the lawyers instructed on behalf of PRAC to recover the sums you owe to PRAC. We therefore do not recognise your letter as a “letter before claim

 

Sorry to sidetrack here, but BW legal have recently done a Lowell Portfolio and gone into the the debt industry themselves...

 

If you were to ignore - fine and probably a good idea for now... But be weary that they may initiate proceedings.

 

Oh and BTW... Ive challenged them on multiple issues the last few weeks. Yet they upped their discount to a whopping 50% .. :p Yeet when i told them when they purchased the account they took on full liabilities, they laughed and said "Even though we purchased the account and are the new legal owners, we have not taken on any liabilities in relation to this account" - Yes you have, you are *OBLIGED* to provide a CCA if i ask for it etc

So tell us more about this debt owed to PDUK etc

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for taking the time to reply :)

 

So ideally . Hang fire for now then start the possibility of . Is it the 3 letter process ? Read about it but not actually done it yet

 

Also which template to use ?

 

Thanks again

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO no ... NO 3 letter process... Have you been reading about sending 3 letters blah blah ... If so... then NO!

This is not the way to do it. Have you been looking at Freeman of the land things?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant issue a stat Demand unless the debt is over 5K...Simply send them a section 77/78 request.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to start a new thread

of your own please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...