Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex wife now pregnant on zero contract what rights does she have?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/maternity-pay-leave/eligibility

 

 

Your employer must give you form SMP1 explaining why you can’t get SMP within 7 days of making their decision. You could get Maternity allowance instead.

 

 

Scroll down to the bottom of the link above and then follow the link to Maternity Allowance. Your wife will need to ask her 'employer' for form SMP1 and explain why she is not entitled to SMP.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Citizen B

 

She has not informed the company she works for at the moment,

because she is worried that as soon as she tells them she will lose the job,

as she is on a Zero hours contract,

 

She has had continuous work with them for the last 22 months,

The initial date they have said for the birth, is about 23rd September so early days,

I think she was going to inform them after her first scan.

 

 

She is my ex wife, by the way , we are just on good terms because of our children,

this is why I was prepared to ask the question on her behalf.

 

Leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awful situation to be in. I hope all goes well for your ex and that she is entitled to something.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, keeping quiet for the next two months to get past the 2 year's employment threshold? A good idea. She can then look very carefully at how her work is allocated and done to determine if she really is a worker and not an employee. The differences can be small so look into whether she has the right to refuse work, work for another employer etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

 

She is defenatley a worker, rather than an employee

 

I think her problem will be to hit the qualifying times,

 

if they decided not to giver any more work because of the Pregnancy, they would be silly to say so.

it is a shame that there is not more protection for her, she is as good as an employee, does exactly the same hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your ex-wife have her contract of employment - it isn't always clear cut that a ZHC means 'worker' status, nor does a 'worker' status mean that there is no entitlement to SMP - eligibility is subject to qualifying criteria, not determined by whether on a ZHC or not

 

Her contract may specify that she is an 'employee' albeit one with no guaranteed hours of work, and the nature of the work and how it is allocated may also determine her status as an 'employee' even if the contract is silent on the matter. Is there an expectation for example that she will do the job or jobs that are sent to her or is she free to say no without detriment?

 

As for facing possible dismissal, or even suffering a detriment due to pregnancy, the company would be on very dodgy ground as it would be a relatively simple matter if (as you say) she has a long history of working the same or similar hours - even if the employer was to reduce the work to nothing, it would be hard to argue that this was not due to the pregnancy and the act would be one of discrimination - actionable even without 2 years service - although it would be costly to take to a Tribunal

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your input

 

CitizenB Thank you for the link interesting reading,

 

Sidewinder She signed something, where she works, she had spoken to her line manager

and he said she was definatley on Zero hours and does not have a contract as an employee.

 

She basically works the same hours as employees. and is expected to be there everyday.

if she is off sick she does not get any sick pay,

 

I think she may be worry too much, but she will need to inform them soon for Health and Safety reasons

 

The company she works for is part of the company who are quite famous for selling Jam from a village in Essex.

They did have a good name for looking after there employees, Cheap rent for employees and even opened a retirment home for former employees. So I hope this part of the company wil have the same ethos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

expected to be there every day? That is leaning towards being an employee (but employed under ulawful contractual conditions). However the comapny way well wish it to be otherwise and it will take a long hard battle to determine whether they are breraking the law or not. For this reason I would be keeping quite until the 2 years service have been met and the she will have more options on what action to take if they tell her to leave (or fail to give her work). Pregnancy is not an illness nor a H&S matter except in certain circumstances such as working with radiation. If she has problems with the pregnancy then she will ahve to tell them if they impinge upon her normal work but otherwise nowt to do with them until the period of confinement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

 

Yes they get annoyed if they do not turn up,

 

I rang in for her when she had a bout of flu, the manager was quite stroppy about it.

 

I only mentioned about H & S with regards to her lifting heavy Boxes which she has to at some point during the day,

As they have a duty of care I thought it only fair it should be mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

People are not obliged to lift heavy boxes, read the "six pack" booklet on the manual handling regs. I would suggest that instead of finding reasons to side with the employers treatment of its staff you start reading up on the law and help your ex-wife if that is your true intent. Everything you have said so far doesnt clarify her situation as far as employment goes so either do a bit or homework or leave her to it rather than give her bad advice

If it can be shown she is an employee rather than a worker she has far more rights so look toward the positive aspects of this- she works for just one employer, she is expected to be there every day and appears to have to make arrangments regarding illness. There really arent that many jobs that are for "workers" rather than "employees" but employers do tend to take the michael in this respect because people are too afraid to question it. She is in an excellent position to do so as to put it bluntly in a couple of months time she will have nothing to lose. Having said this you dotn want to chagre in at full tilt until all the facts are known.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again

 

As She is my Ex I can not prey to much where work is concerned, as the company possibly

would not divulge the info anyway.

She is a foreign National this is why I am asking as gets mixed up sometimes.

 

From what I understand is she only gets paid for the hours worked,

So there is no minimum 8 hrs per day,

but she has to work longer until orders are finished.or less if small orders

Her hours have varied from 30 hrs per week to 45 hrs per week depending on the time of year.

 

I agree if she can last a couple of months she has nothing to lose.

No Sick pay but she is paid holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are still completely missing the point about the difference between a worker and an employee.It has nothing to do with the hours worked, nothing to do with a variation in hours, it is abouther right to say no whenever she wants to and how her work is assigned to her.

If you want to be helpful ask her for a copy of her employment contract and then dont bother with the bit about it being a zero hours contract but read the other detail about availability to work, working for other employers etc. That is what determines the difference. Also, what do the employers provide as fara s equipment/tools etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ericsbrother

 

Yes It is my true intention to help her,

No I am not siding with the company over H & S rule

 

I have asked to see her contract,

She stated she signed something at the start of working for the company,

But does not have a copy.

She is going to ask for a copy today, to clarify where she stands,

 

the company supply the hair nets and aprons in the food prep area where she works.

 

I can only go on the info I have been given, the reason for asking

is to try and help her, as her reading and writing of English is not very good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

small things can make the difference hence asking about all sorts of everything.Many companies use zero hours contracts improperly.

I have one for part time teaching and are happy with it as I can decide not to work at a certain location or on certain days should I wish. I dont do this at the drop of a hat but it does mean I can watch the tennis rather than look at the same error on a problem sheet made by 50% of the class who never would plagiarise each others work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found time to look at the link CitizenB provided

This part I found if you got the job through an agency,

 

You are usually an employee if the following arrangements exist at your work:

your employer deducts tax and National Insurance from your pay

your employer controls the work you do, when and how you do it

your employer provides all the equipment for your work.

 

So it looks like she may tick all the correct boxes

 

I hope to have a copy of her contract sometime next week as the lady who deals with this is away until next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we are getting there. If she works via an agency then she is entitled to certain protections but not others so ask if you can see a pay slip and see who it is issued by and the employers tax district code. That will identify the employer but not necessarily determine the contractual rights but it all helps piece the puzzle together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all

I gave up asking for sight of contract.

 

I do have sight of her pay slip/sheet

 

She is paid directly by the company she is working for.

no Tax district code on there.

 

I had been reading through the link citizen B supplied,

 

She will be seeing the mid wife for a check up and hopefully she will get the certificate of the due date for her employer.

 

She is now 15 weeks gone ,

the company are starting to ask questions as she has had time off for the Midwife/scan etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

She must inform them sooner rather than later - for health and safety reasons as much as anything else as there are certain protections once her pregnancy is notified to the employer

 

Health overrides any other considerations

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Sidewinder

She intended to inform them next week once she had the certificate from the midwife with the official due date,

this is how I interpreted, the advise on the link Citizen B provided.

 

I will type up a letter for her so she can let them know.( she can not read and write English properly yet)

She is concerned that they will force her out once she has informed them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a bit of an update

 

I composed a letter for he,informing the company,

This was due to Sidewinders comments and the mount of appointments she has had.

 

 

The company seem to be supportive, and she is waiting on HR t have a chat on the way forward,

Unfortunately there may be a problem with the pregnancy she will have had 4 different appointments this week alone.

Thank you for your input,

 

If anything else arises I will get back to you.

 

Leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...