Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot re lloyds credit card -Illegible agreement - comments please!


senequier
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

they would have been sent to a company who purported to have taken over my credit card debts (for a fee)

- this company ceased trading so the various card companies started to come back to me.

 

 

ah so you were in a fee paying DMP?

 

 

who?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Highbridge supposedly took on my debts in their entirety (I would never be bothered again etc etc),then folded -

well,I was bothered by every creditor!

 

surprise surprise - on a no win no fee basis, a party is going after Highbridge for me and a few hundred others

- I sued the party who introduced me to Highbridge in small claims track and was successful but that is small fry.

 

But Highbridge did treat matter as a DMP, acting on my behalf - not quite the same thing as taking on the debt IMHO -

 

But thanks for reply dx100uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god not that lot..

 

 

class action?

thought that had been quashed by grant thorntons long ago?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposedly a company called Fountain Templar succeeding in getting results

- not my words, and I haven't heard direct since I signed up! ( 15 months ago!) so, not holding breath

- personally, cannot understand why the Highbridge lot have not been brought to justice one way or another

- but thanx again dx100uk

- must also say that I have looked at 3 or 4 other sites like this, but this is by far the best - no BS!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Andyorch - but I'm not seeing any specific amounts mentioned - I am left with 2 situations at mo,one around £10k and the other around £16k - obvs,I am assuming (but don't like to) these would have merited default notices - Yours,S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it only applies if they try to enforce the agreements in court....Im a little lost as to why you are looking at this Legislation?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx for that Andyorch

 

 

- 2 debts were assigned to Cabot last summer

- I wrote to say why I thought neither was enforceable and had replies saying they would look into matters

- over 6 months ago now, and no further contact.

 

 

Meanwhile,

I started reading this site and also realised no default notices or annual updates were ever sent to me,

 

 

I thought if Carboot came back saying in their view enforceable,

I would throw that back

- I don't know if they could themselves retrospectively send out default notices or whether they can only come from original creditor,

 

 

as my impression is OCs won't generally go to too much trouble to dig out old paperwork for DCAs.

 

All best,S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay Im with you now and understand why you looked at this.

 

What you have to bear in mind is when a debt is assigned to a DCA...Its a DCA thats all... a debt collector a chaser of money...they are not concerned with legislation and what they should be doing in order to comply with their credit licence....or to comply with the Credit Consumer Act 1974 even though they should adhere to it.

 

They cant issue default notices ..they cant add anything to the debt amount...all they can do is change the name of the OC on your Credit Reference Files to theirs and update the information accordingly until it reaches its sixth anniversary.

 

They cant correct any errors that the Original Creditor may of fallen foul of in administering your original agreement.

 

They hold no documentation with regards to the agreement..that remains with the Original Creditor...when they purchase your debts for say 10p in the £ which is all it costs them...they simply get a print out with your name address account number and debt amount...and possibly default details.....nothing else.

 

This is why they come unstuck when they try to capitalise on your debt by issuing a court claim and you defend it.....

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Am just kicking off here at present hoping to see an URL number so I can send a copy of an application form for a credit card for the site's inspection/advice as to whether it is enforceable.

This was sent in response to a request for a copy of the original credit card agreement.

Will be back once I hear as to whether this is enforceable or not.

But many thanks in advance for any comments/advice/help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum..if you tell us which company senequier then we can place you in the correct forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Lloyd s Bank Forum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

A debt was assigned to a DCA

- it has taken a year to produce 2 sheets of an agreement which is mostly illegible,

 

they appear to think they are covered by saying the original would have been sent to my home at time of application (10 years ago).

 

In their view, this debt is enforceable and I am asked to get in touch to arrange repayments - if I do,they might be able to reduce the amount owing......

 

Would welcome any comment/advice -

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please give more background on the debt and post up what they sent please.

 

The offer of a reduced settlement is also very telling :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 sheets of whatever they Are doesn't meet an enforceable CCA Return

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you make your last payment or acknowledge in writing that you accepted the debt? Did you send the DCA a CCA request along with the £1 payment? What date did you send it?

If you did send a CCA request, two sheets in response regardless of their legibility is insufficient. That would put them in breach of the Act and there is no reason for you to make payments until the request has been correctly complied with.

 

To give you an idea on what you should receive and the situation when you don't receive the requested information the FCA have issued a booklet

the relevant part is -

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/CONC/13.pdf

13.1.4 onwards is perhaps of most interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Renegade - thanx for speedy reply - can I send you that on PM - just a bit concerned if DCA trawl through these sites?

 

Thank you - I did wonder as on another one,I was sent about a dozen sheets of stuff - but that's great,for starters!

 

Thanx lookinforinfo - just been reading that link - but if I answer your questions here,I'm just a bit concerned the collection agency could also read the questions and answers - and I'm not an expert on computers and files etc - apologies,wrong generation!

 

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Reply appreciated - what forum is this - am hopeless on computer,apologies

 

2 sheets of whatever they Are doesn't meet an enforceable CCA Return

 

Thank you - I did wonder as on another one,I was sent about a dozen sheets of stuff - but that's great,for starters!

 

When did you make your last payment or acknowledge in writing that you accepted the debt? Did you send the DCA a CCA request along with the £1 payment? What date did you send it?

If you did send a CCA request, two sheets in response regardless of their legibility is insufficient. That would put them in breach of the Act and there is no reason for you to make payments until the request has been correctly complied with.

 

To give you an idea on what you should receive and the situation when you don't receive the requested information the FCA have issued a booklet

the relevant part is -

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/CONC/13.pdf

13.1.4 onwards is perhaps of most interest.

 

Thanx lookinforinfo - just been reading that link - but if I answer your questions here,I'm just a bit concerned the collection agency could also read the questions and answers - and I'm not an expert on computers and files etc - apologies,wrong generation!

 

Please give more background on the debt and post up what they sent please.

 

The offer of a reduced settlement is also very telling :)

 

Hi Renegade - thanx for speedy reply - can I send you that on PM - just a bit concerned if DCA trawl through these sites?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt matter if they do trawl the sites. THey cant do anything. Post it up and redact all personal identifiers and reference numbers. Blank out the amounts if you want too, so they cant trace it if you think they can. CAGS policy is to put everything on forum, not PM.

 

we need background on it, as a compliant agreement, be it before or post 2007 needs to be in a specific format and have certain documents.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Told you stop playing secret squirrel on your other thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...