Jump to content


cabot/restons claimform - old Cap1 card 'debt'


adviseme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well ignore that ..they simply mean that Restons are acting for them on the claim.....the above requires a few edits

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK - their letter actually says it is assigned to restons. But Okidokes.

 

What needs changing?

 

I'll get it sorted tomorrow after work - re-post it here to be checked and then subit it.

 

Thanks again for all the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a further look at your point 1...its weak....its okay to say you have in the past held accounts but you need to add further as to why you dispute the claim.

 

I would drop the references to Notices of Sums in Arrears and concentrate on the actual default notice the breach and put them to strict proof

 

The claimant does not need to show how you entered into an agreement with the claimant...because they have not said you have...they stated...

 

" under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital One dated on or about Nov 30 2012 "

 

The rest is okay

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I've taken out the bits suggested.

 

Here's how it looks now - please let me know your thoughts. I am hoping to get this defence in tonight. (Or should I wait one more day in case they come up with evidence?)

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital One dated on or about Nov 30 2012

 

2. And assigned to the claimant on Sept 24 2015

 

PARTICULARS a/c no *****************84845

DATE 30/01/2017 Item Default Balance 1550.00 Post Refri Cr NIL TOTAL 1550.00

 

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Capital One credit card services. I am unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim. They have stated the account number in their particulars..are you sure your unaware?

 

2. Paragraph 2 is ........?

 

3. On the 23rd February 2017 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply and therefore is in default of this request and as such unable to request any relief until compliance. I have also requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request to clarify its claim, the Claimants solicitors have failed to respond.

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show evidence of service of Notice of Sums in Arrears

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

Few notes above hilighted

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy,

 

i have edited as suggested.

 

 

Should I remove all of part 2 in my defence?

 

 

I have seen it in other defences, so thought it should go in.

 

 

I'm pretty sure I did have an account, but honestly don't remember opening it, or ever using it - although guess I must have as I did make payments.

 

and when I do post my defence,

do I just paste it all in online,

or do I have to upload the word document?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy,

 

i have edited as suggested. Should I remove all of part 2 in my defence? I have seen it in other defences, so thought it should go in. I'm pretty sure I did have an account, but honestly don't remember opening it, or ever using it - although guess I must have as I did make payments.

 

You mean your point 1. ?

 

And you need to finish your point 2.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a previous edit you said to remove point 2 - so I just renumbered, leaving 2 out.

 

As it stands so far:

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital One dated on or about Nov 30 2012 and assigned to the claimant on Sept 24 2015

 

PARTICULARS a/c no *****************84845

DATE 30/01/2017 Item Default Balance 1550.00 Post Refri Cr NIL TOTAL 1550.00

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Capital One credit card services. I am unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim.

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Capital One; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show evidence of service of Notice of Sums in Arrears

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

2. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

3. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

4. On the 23rd February 2017 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply and therefore is in default of this request and as such unable to request any relief until compliance. I have also requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request to clarify its claim, the Claimants solicitors have failed to respond.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Oh! Yeh - point 1. Point 2 was (previously)

2 I have no recollection of ever receiving a Notice of Assignment over 2 years ago nor ever been approached with regards to any alleged debt. The claimant has failed to issue any Notice of Sums in Arrears or statements since the alleged assignment and is therefore prevented from seeking relief pursuant to the CCA2006 amendments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post your final draft with all amendments here first before submitting .

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just use the std holding def please

why adapt it????????????

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Capital One dated on or about Nov 30 2012

 

2. And assigned to the claimant on Sept 24 2015

 

PARTICULARS a/c no *****************84845

DATE 30/01/2017 Item Default Balance 1550.00 Post Refri Cr NIL TOTAL 1550.00

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Capital One credit card services. I am unaware of what alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim.

 

2. Paragraph is denied I have no recollection of ever receiving a Notice of Assignment over 2 years ago nor ever been approached with regards to any alleged debt.

 

3. On the 23rd February 2017 I made a legal request by way of a section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply and therefore is in default of this request and as such unable to request any relief until compliance. I have also requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request to clarify its claim, the Claimants solicitors have failed to respond.

 

Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Capital One; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show evidence of service of Notice of Sums in Arrears

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

just use the std holding def please

why adapt it????????????

 

I don't understand that. Sorry.

 

I am really worried that I have the dates wrong, so will use this defence tomorrow morning with any amendments suggested.

 

Can anyone confirm a: this is OK to use, and B: that I just copy the bit from the word Defence onward and paste it somewhere online? (IE No particulars etc.)

 

Thank you all so much - I must admit I have been more stressed than ever lately. Hoping this will change once I get this all done.

 

I know it wasn't much I donated yesterday; hoping to add to that after payday as a way to thank you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defence in post #62 is correct...I keep amending your attempts and you keep posting it back reverted ...hence I unapproved your last post.

 

You dont submit the red particulars.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats the norm as per the other 1000s Restons threads:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing to worry about even if you do hear..:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've had a response from the court saying the claim will be automatically stayed if the claimant doesn't respond in 28 days.

 

I've heard nothing more from Restons or Cabot.

 

Guessing this is all normal, and I just need to wait a while.

 

It's been nice being able to sleep without worrying too much

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll get willy waving from rectums

 

You only respond if the court write

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Had a willy waving reply - basically saying I'm a silly boy for using a form from a forum as my defence LOL

 

Then I got a although we are sure we will win, we will accept £xxxx in settlement - but the debt will not be parked as paid in full.

 

Ignored both. Guessing something should happen soon regarding court? IE they file their response - or it gets staid or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already stayed...now whos the silly boys ?

 

Seriously aggravatin...no G :-D

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...