Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Oil Filter - Mini Cooper S


mrswootang1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

on the 28th Dec hubby went off to a parts supplier and picked up a new Oil filter and oil and as usual gave the registration number.

 

 

He brought the parts home and proceeded with the oil change.

As always before swapping the filters over he holds them up and checks that they are the same size.

Once in he took the car for a drive and 7 miles later 'bang'.

 

 

We got her home and had a look the following day at what had happened and the bottom crank had knackered up.

 

 

When inspecting the 'new' oil filter we realised that whilst they were very very similar (i'm talking maybe a mm or so difference) the part numbers were also different (by 1 digit).

On checking the part numbers the 'new' one was for a BMW not a MCS!

 

Now we are still waiting the parts place insurance company to come back to us with confirmation of liability.

 

 

The engineer that came out last week was rude and threatening to hubby on the phone

(mobile to mobile so no proof I guess) and his comment was 'i'll either be your best friend, or your worst enemy!'

 

I'm hoping that we see every last penny that we have had to spend out on fixing the car especially as we are now 7wks in since the complaint was put in.

 

 

Anyone give us any advice ? or been in a similar positions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any further dealings with them directly or on the phone, then you should make sure that you record everything. You have already lost an opportunity to acquire evidence of the conversation which you have already had.

 

If you have evidence that you specifically asked for the they provided you with the incorrect item, then I think that there should be no problem – even if you have to go to court, recovering all of your losses.

 

You would have to show that you asked for the correct item, that they sold you the incorrect item and that the fitting of the incorrect item caused the damage to your vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bankfodder :)

 

 

yes everything has been done via email and we have copies of everything!

 

 

They aren't getting away that lightly!

 

 

The parts place have more or less admitted liability anyway on one of their 1st emails to us. S

 

 

o this is just going through the motions really.

 

 

Once we are sorted the insurance/engineer companies will be getting one hell of a complaint email/letter with how we have been treated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are covered by the Consumer Rights Act which in your case requires that goods must fit the description and also fit for the purpose for which they are sold.

 

Just to warn you, that dealings with insurers can sometimes be long and drawnout. Really, the insurance company shouldn't be your problem. It is the supplier needs to claim on their insurance to indemnify them for the consequences of their mistake. Your claim is directly against the supplier. I would suggest that if there is any undue delay – and I mean more than 10 days, that you write the supplier and tell them that you will be taking direct action against them if they don't compensate you for your losses. If this vehicle is your only vehicle a new are put to additional expense hiring an alternative vehicle then they would be liable for that as well.

 

They are liable for all the direct and foreseeable consequences which follow naturally from their breach of contract/negligence act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this " parts supplier " a large company or just a local one ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...