Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells Claimform - old Cap1 Card 'debt'


stephenXL
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hoping for some help here.

 

Friend has had claimform served.

 

Needs to delay the process.

 

claimant is Lowells acting as assigned for credit card debt with Capital One.

 

Should he still apply to Lowells to produce a signed copy of the Credit agreement and a statement of accounts etc., under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for the fee of £1.

(don't want to restart the 6years rule).

 

As I understood it from the past, the lack of an exact copy of the original signed Credit Agreement may render a "debt" as unenforceable.

 

Would this be reason enough to stall the court process and avoid the CCJ actually being issued?

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Your friend should certainly apply for a CCA. If one is not forthcoming then they would not be entitled to begin a claim until one was eventually found – if at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

 

Stephen if you could read the following link which explains the process and what you need to request.

 

Also copy and paste the Qs and your responses back here then we have all the information in one post.

 

Please copy the claimants particulars verbatim...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back on this.

 

My friend has 14days to reply to the court,

so does he simply return the dispute form stating he has made an application to the claimant(Lowells) for the CCA?

 

 

If so, would he need to send a copy of the letter he sends to Lowells with the dispute notice?

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back on this.

My friend has 14days to reply to the court, so does he simply return the dispute form stating he has made an application to the claimant(Lowells) for the CCA? If so, would he need to send a copy of the letter he sends to Lowells with the dispute notice?

 

No...please read and complete the above.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I shall follow your instructions.

Thanks

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of Claimant : lowells

 

 

Issue date: 16 Feb 2017

 

Particluars of Claim

 

1) The Defendant entered into a consumer creditlink3.gif Act 1974 regulated agreement with Capital Onelink3.gif under account reference .......("the Agreement").

 

2)The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

 

3)The agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 24/06/2015 and notice given to the Defendant.

 

4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £860.40 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of £860.40

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.189, but limited to one year, being £68.83

 

c) Costs Total £1059.23

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? It was 2010.

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. lowells

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

A: 16 July 2015 Letter from Capital One informing that the account sold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd

26 June 2015

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

A: Notice of Default served under section 87 (1) of CCA 1974. Dated 18/06/2014 from Capital One

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

A: Notice of Sums in Arrears from Capital One dated 22/05/2014, not seen any since then

Why did you cease payments?

A: Depression following a messy divorce, 3 adolescent dependents to take care of too as a result.

 

What was the date of your last payment?

A: About January or February 2014

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

A: No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into debt management.

A: Yes, contacted Capital One by phone at the beginning of 2014 asking for interest to be frozen, financial difficulty as result of depression etc. This was by phone, so have no written confirmation.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch i'll be honest here and say this could get sticky

its a 2010 sign up, so probably online?

 

and they'll be able to use a recon agreement too.

and with a last payment of 2014 theres no SB route .

 

in addition to the below, id get an sar running to cap1

there could be lots of penalty charges/PPI? to offset this figure

as I suspect this might have to result in a tomlin.

 

but lots of water under the bridge to go yet.

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having spoken to my friend,

it is his belief that he did not sign up on-line for this credit card.

Fairly sure it was done by post.

 

Moving on then:

 

He goes ahead with the SAR.

and also the CCA along with the CPR 31:14?

 

I will get him to sign up on MCOL tomorrow to acknowledge

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chop chop Stephen..the CCA/CPR should have already gone on the 19th

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remind me please CCA goes to Lowells? CRP 31:14 goes to Lowells solicitors? SAR goes to Cap One, and he must sign this?

This will all have to be done tomorrow.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to remind you......

you need to read your thread

its here already..post 8 .............

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

SAR to Cap One, CCA to Lowells, CPR to solicitors. All going Guaranteed delivery first thing. MCOL done too.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

why sar?

where have we said that??

other than it might be useful to gander stuff to offset the claimed total...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post #8

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

However the SAR has not gone to post yet.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but the sar might only be useful to offset stuff IF they get a CCJ..

 

 

 

 

see how it progresses

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should the SAR wait for the time being then?

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

MCOL AOS done and all other boxes ticked as suggested,

 

CCA, SAR and CPR31:14 all posted by recorded delivery.

Signed for in each case on 2/3/2017.

Clocks ticking.

 

What should be done next?

 

When do we file the defence as such?

 

Thanks.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Day 33 from date on claim form whereby that's day1 in the count

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Lowells Solicitors have responded to the letter sent to them (make no mention of CPR31:14), noting the intention to defend, extra 14 days blah blah.They then go on to say:

"This account will be placed on hold until we have received the requested documents from the original creditor Capital One in relation to the account opened xx/xx/2010.The copy agreement, statements and default notice will then be forwarded to you upon receipt."

 

"We enclose the letter of assignment dated xx/xx/15 for your perusal. The Deed of Assignment will not be sent to you as it is a confidential agreement between our client and the original creditor containing information to which you are not entitled to see. No other agreement/Deed of Novation exists between you and our client."

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Template response...with your name and address added...and BTW you didn't request the Deed of Assignment..you requested the Notice of Assignment...hence its enclosure.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy,

Should the copy of that "assignment" be so stated.

 

 

Because what they've sent does not say "Notice of Assignment".

 

 

The letter states only that Cap One no longer own the account and that the account is now owned by Lowell.

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of Assignment can come from either the assignor or assignee but it must conform with s.136 Law of Property Act 1925....and contain all the required prescribes of the account and amounts.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request was received and signed for by Lowells on 2nd March.

 

They have not responded.

 

What should we do now?

 

Also we are getting very close to having to file a defence to court, issue date 16th/02/2017.

 

Am I right to say that we have to do that during this weekend?

 

Not sure.

 

Thanks

Advice & opinions of stephenXL are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgement. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...