Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt collectors on old debt


renee125
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a monument card in 2000 and lost my job in 2003 and agreed to pay £1 a month.

 

 

I stopped paying this at some point and just ignored any correspondence.

I know monument was taken over by someone else and the debt stopped appearing on my credit file.

 

 

fast forward 2016

I get a letter from arrow debt collectors saying they now have the debt and want payment.

I ignored it as surely it's statute barred.

 

 

2017 I look at my credit file and it's on there with a default date of 2015!!!!

 

The debt is there at my old address which I left in 2009!

I disputed it on my credit file and got the following response

 

"No Change by Arrow

 

The lender has advised that :

When Arrow Global acquired this account on 22.12.2014 the account was not statute barred.

The last payment was 14.09.2010 for £1.00.

The customer was sent a notice of assignment,

2 notice of arrears prior to default and then a default notice.

 

The account will remain on the credit file for a period of six years from the date of default."

 

That is absolutely ridiculous as they're saying even though I stopped paying in 2010 they've issued a default 5 years later!!

Is that even allowed??

I thought it had to be after a few missed payments.

 

What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you say you disputed it, what did you do. from what you say, looks like a stat bar letter.

of course they'll say its from the def notice or registered def date, whichever suits them. fact is both are wrong (partic the latter) re stat bar.

and, there shldn't be a default in 2015 if you stopped payments in 2010 (afair the ico says at most around 6 months after things have broken down). and it was assigned in 2014 (defaults usually precede an assignment sale).

who registered that default, the dca.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to complain to monument that the default was not registered in a timely manner

 

they are still around.

 

have you all the statements?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not had any communication with them since 2005 when I set up the £1 agreement.

 

 

As I said I left my old address in 2009 so that's where any correspondence would have gone.

I thought monument was taken over by Barclays or someone else?

 

I disputed it on my credit file with equifax as I haven't heard from them in years

so how could a default appear on my credit file with no record of previous payments.

That was their response back

Link to post
Share on other sites

so as post 3 then

write to monument

 

complain that the defaulted date should have been the date of your third missed/short payment.

give them 14 days to rectify the error

else your be starting a complaint with the ICO.

and seeking financial compensation.

 

on another note

didn't have payment break plan did you?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no PPI they call it payment break plan...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you all the statements

time to get reclaiming that then

monument are coughing quite nicely on PBP reclaims at present.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...