Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BARCLAY CARD - has got wrong details on my C.R.A Files


CuriousBee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Slick

I attach the letter that I received from BC. Sorry I seemed to have duplicated it.

 

I also drafted the following letter to BC as per below:

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I am very disappointed to see that the level of customer care standards have dropped down so much that you have resorted to sending standard letters without due care or holding a proper investigation to my complaint.

 

Third paragraph of your letter indicated that you were not aware of my new address.

However, I have been receiving letters,

and in fact have received the same standard letter from Barclaycard.

 

I also gave my new address over the phone.

Furthermore,

I have taken the necessary ID to the nearest branch to confirm my new address,

and with my SAR request I have sent the proof of ID and new address.

 

If this is the level of standard you provide,

then I am not surprised the level of incompetency within your organisation resulting in placing wrong information on customers’ credit files.

 

As I said before I do not owe any money to Barclaycard.

I only had the ‘INITIAL’ Barclaycard which was paid off in 2015.

 

I have made regular payments and have paid off the card few times.

You have sent a statement for the above card without data which indicates that you do not actually have any proof that I hold this card.

 

I therefore, request you to take necessary steps to remove the Default Note and the incorrect details from my credit file.

 

I hereby give you 14 days to take action, and failure to do so will result in making a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman and legal action against Barclaycard.

 

CB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am still waiting for the BC to reply to my letter, will be two weeks next week.

 

If I do not hear from them do I write to fos or ICO or both?

 

I want them to remove the wrong details from my file,

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

thanks CB

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've not given them 14 days notice before complaining to the ICO

you need too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am still waiting to hear from Barclaycard.

However, I checked the CRA file and it has disappeared.

So they may have now removed the DN.

 

I will check with Experience as well.

Not sure how reliable Noddle is as they had wrong information on their records which had to be corrected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The cra's display the information provided to them from the banks et al

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like Barclaycard to send me in writing to say that they had got the wrong details but now have removed from CRA files.

I wonder if they would do this.

May be I will send them a letter asking them to confirm if they had removed the wrong details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date was the default?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This has taken months.

Finally BC agreed to delete the DN,

however, at the same time has sent a letter to say that they have passed the information onto Hoist.

I am confused.

 

Have spoken to them to find out why this has taken so long.

I was told that they sent a letter and a cheque for £107 as compensation which I never received.

Yet, at the same time passed the info to DCA.

 

Is this normal or legal?

Why pay the compensation if they did not think it was wrong to put the DN on my CR file?

 

I had a battle with CR agencies telling them the DN should not be there.

Some months it was on then off the CR files and then on again.

Not sure who is responsible for this.

I have spoken to BC today and they are looking into it.

 

Has anyone had this experience with BC?

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've no doubt sold the account to the robbers hoist

 

 

so have you got the money yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX - thanks for the response.

 

No I have not received the letter and the cheque that they claimed sent in April.

I wonder if they sent to the old address.

 

I spoke to BC today and the person I spoke to said that there will be a new investigation to the account and therefore will let Hoist/Robinson not to proceed with anything.

 

I told her that whilst there is a dispute they cannot allow a DCA to deal with the account.

She is looking into this now and that means another 2 months will be gone.

The account will be SB'd in Nov.

I am wondering if the DCA trying to get in quickly before it becomes SB'd.

 

So now waiting to hear from them again.

 

My concern is if they sent a letter and paying me compensation why sell it to a DCA.

I told her that if I don't hear from them soon I will be writing to ICO.

 

Can I still write to ICO or do I need to wait until the new investigation is over?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they say they did this is april is it now def gone

if it has you've nowt to complaint about to the ICO

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB,

 

You should not be talking to BC or anyone else. Keeps all comms in writing by letter or email so you have proof of what's said.

 

Finally BC agreed to delete the DN
- Did they say this by phone, letter or email.

 

Are you sure BC and/or the DCA's have your current address - proved by them writing to you ?

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick.

 

I was chasing them yesterday as I did not hear for months.

I was told that BC sent a letter with a cheque for £107 as compensation and will be deleting the DN from the CR file.

 

I don't know if anyone at BC got things confused.

I did have a card and it was paid off in 2015.

 

I asked the person I spoke to send me the letter again,

and she said she will send it and that she will also start a new investigation.

It seems that BC's internal system in chaos.

 

The account that I was querying was totally different

and I have sent many letters with my new address asking them to delete the DN from the CR file.

 

there was no reason to send to my previous address.

More importantly, whilst the dispute was going on they have instructed a DCA.

 

This account does not exist so it should not even be in the CR file.

how can they got a DCA involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them 7 days to send you the copy letter - after that, fire a written complaint to BC HQ.

 

Trust nothing you are told by phone unless you're recording it.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received what you need from BC as well ?

 

Great that the CRA's have complied !

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Slick - thank you for your help.

 

I am now confused

I had another letter, and a cheque for £200 more than previously sent

and at the same letter says the debt has been sold to Hoist.

Do people in BC know what they are doing?

 

I am going to send a letter tomorrow asking what date they sold the account as I have had no letters or calls from Hoist, and no Notice of Assignment or anything.

 

Not sure why they are paying compensation and selling to a DCA.

 

Can I make a complaint to FCA?

 

Can BC sell an account whilst there is a dispute going on?

 

I hope Hoist is not using my old address to get a 'backdoor' CCJ.

BC has my new address so there is no reason not to give Hoist the old address.

 

What is surprising is that they say apologise in one letter and send me a cheque and in another letter with a larger amount and telling me Hoist are dealing my case.

 

They should be ashamed as it seems because BC cannot resolve the issue they have given it to a DCA to sort out.

 

Surely a big company like BC should be able to resolve the matters between the customer and themselves first.

It also seems that they cannot be bothered hence selling to a DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB,

 

It may be worth waiting maybe 7 days or so to see if you get anything more by post that makes more sense of events.

 

In the meantime, monitor your CRA files as it may take a while for the adverse data to be removed.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick

 

Noddle says it will be removed next month. Equifax has removed it. I may check Experian as well.

 

Can the BC pay compensation for the inconvenience and at the same time say they have sold the account.

 

They told me that because they do not have agreements they cannot enforce a CCJ or anything but they have sold to Hoist.

 

I don't understand how that can be?

 

Will let you know if I hear more.

Thanks CB

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to stop any creditor selling a lemon debt on to a debt buyer

that's what they deal with

 

buying debts in bulk on a spreadsheets for pennies to the pound

and sending out phishing letters to try and fleece people that think they are bailiffs into coughing up.

when they have no legal powers whatsoever.

 

biggest banking sector there is

800'000 claimforms are issued every years

85% go undefended

easy money for a very small outlay.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out for Hoist re registering the Default.

 

Hoist will no doubt write to you with a notice of assignment stating that now they are the legal owners. Hoist use Robinson Way as their collection agents.

 

As soon as you get any letter from Hoist/Robbers way, send a s78 CCA request ( which you already know they cant comply with via BC) and ignore anything else until you actually receive an agreement.

Unless of course they are dumb enough to issue a claimform.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Martin

Many thanks for your response.

I have drafted a letter to BC today, and would appreciate if you could please have a look and advice if it is ok to send.

Thanks again - CB

Thank you for your letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you also for sending me the cheque £xxxxxx (as compensation for distress) which I received with the letter.

 

Whilst I appreciate that you have made an effort to resolve the issue, I am disappointed also that there was no resolution at the end of the investigation.

 

Under the heading ‘Our Investigation’ Paragraph three says that you have provided the information. However, the points raised in all my letters were that Barclaycard has not provided all the information I needed to know that it is my account. You also mentioned that Barclaycard has sold that account to a third party.

 

Firstly, all my letters requesting Barclaycard to provide a Prescribed Terms and Conditions along with the Credit Agreement (through SAR and CCA requests) failed. You have admitted that you cannot enforce the debt because of lack of documentation. If the Creditor unable to fulfil SAR/CCA requests and provide the vital documentation which shows the debtor came to an agreement with the creditor, then surely the obligation of transferring debt to a third party is prohibited because there was no agreement in the first place. If there was no agreement then you cannot assume the debt still exists and pass onto a third party which is an unlawful act.

 

Secondly, you passed my personal information to a third party which contravened Data Protection Act. You have no evidence to suggest that the debt still exists, and therefore you cannot conveniently pass it onto a third party because you know that you will never be able to enforce this debt.

 

Thirdly, if you had sold the alleged account then you have not followed the process properly. To date, I have not received a Notice of Assignment or any information on Hoist Portfolio except to mention in your letter to say that I need to contact them directly. This is not the process that one would expect from a large establishment such as Barclaycard.

 

I will be forwarding all the correspondence to Financial Ombudsman Services, FCA and ICO for their review and information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

load of ole twaddle CB

totally pointless

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi D

is it not worth writing to FOS?

 

BC said it is their final response hence the reason for sending this letter to BC and then to fos.

 

Although they said they have passed my details to Hoist I have not heard from them.

 

Perhaps it is too early, and may be they are trying to find the best approach

- through the 'back door' using my old address.

 

I am checking the CR file regularly to see if changes.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are you going on about?

 

BC know your correct address so if they've sold it do the fleecers

they've done nothing wrong by selling 'a' debt on.

 

I'm just lost as to why you need to write or complain to anyone?

nor keep checking your file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...