Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Multimaster Sofa Insurance Harveys


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

This is my first post so please be gentle if I do something wrong. I am also about to make another post about Ebay so help there would be appreciated (not much going right at the minute).

 

In March I purchased a sofa from Harveys buy now pay December, I also purchased accidental insurance for 5 years at a cost of £150.

 

On July 25th I rang to make a claim on it as my husband had scratched down the side when moving it. On 28 July I received a phone call for the technician to visit. On the day I got a phone call saying the van had broken down and the next available appointment was 14 August I agreed to this and took the day off work.

 

On 14 August when it got late in the day I rang and asked where he was and was told he had been and I was not in. I told the girl I had been in all day and no one had called after several more phone calls she said he had gone to the wrong house and he was on his way. He came and took the photos and said he would be in touch.

 

After two weeks of not hearing anything I rang again and was told the emails were lost, then another phone call that they had gone to the wrong address. Two weeks later I received a call saying the technician would be in touch.

 

After five days of not hearing anything I rang again and was told the technician was sending to head office for a colour pigment that was 29 September. After two more weeks I rang and was told the technician would have to come and take a swatch. After another week I rang again and was told someone would get back to me no one has yet rang back.

 

The phone calls have been to both head office and the local technician. I wrote on 23 October to both Harveys and Multimaster and today I got a letter from Multimaster saying they will look into it and get back to me within 28 days.

 

I just don't want anything else to do with them but don't know where I stand on paying in December. Can anyone help please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, I was just googling for Multimaster contact details and came across this thread. After reading it, I thought the situation looks exactly like mine, so I decided to share my exeprience with Multimaster. and also wondering if finally got any futher with her claim.

 

I actually live in Republic of Ireland, we purchased a suit of fabric furniture in Reids (2 + 3 seaters) and took out Multimaster insurance in May 2004.

 

In May 2005, my husband left his notebook and permanent marker on the sofa, which tipped over and left a huge black stain on the arm of the 3 seater.

So, I submitted a claim to Multimaster.

They sent me back a cleaning kit for leather. I called them back and asked if they are expecting me to clean the fabric with leather kit.

They said that on their systems the furniture insured is coming up as leather, and that I had to go back to the retailer and get them to submit correct details for the furnutire. That took a couple of months. After numerous calls, they finally recieved it and said they will send out someone to have a look and see if the stain could be eliminated.

 

After a month, a few failed visit, a guy finallyshowed up, said nothing can be done to this, and promised to file and send report to Multimaster.

As you guessed Multimaster never received the report. After another couple of months of calling the guy who inspected the furniture and who said the sent the report to the Multimaster several times and Multimaster denying receiving it, Mulstimaster decided to empoy another inspector.

Another few months and the second guy finally appeared on out door step. This one even took a sample of a fabric from the bottom of the sofa.

Again, problems with report receipt on Multimaster side. After they finally received it, they took another 28 days to review the claim. Then they said they will try to contact the producer of the furniture to see if the arm could be replaced. The response was that the furniture is discountinued and the arm could not be replaced. They had to review the case agian for another 28 days. Then they requested me to provide a proof of purchase and value of furniture and the policy, as Reid's could not locate this information. we did.

 

So, in October 2006, after 18 months, they sent me a cheque for £900 pounds which only covered half of the price of the furniture and told me I could keep the furniture.

 

It took me a while to get back to them, but I sent the cheque back early 2007 and said that I do not want to keep the furniture, but would like the whole suit to be replaced according to the terms of the contract.

After another few months and more phone calls, they sent me a letter, saying I could go and choose a new suit of furniture from Reid Furniture, send them the specs and they would place and order for me. Which I did. After a month they sent me another letter asking for a cheque to cover the difference between the original price and the purchase price. I did. The delivery time on the furniture was 16-18 weeks, i sent the cheque in June 2007, so was expecting the furniture to be arriving in October.

I phoned in September and was told that Multimaster has been bought over by another company, my order has never been placed and they will review the case and get back to me. The security has also changed and they couldn't talk to me without my husband's authorisation, as his name was on the policy. After few more converstaions they said they will need to check if the cheque Multimaster sent me in 2006, has actually not been cashed and I will recieve aphone call in a few weeks.

After 2 weeks, I called them myself and heard recoded message on the phone "our offices are currently closed. please call back during normal business hours 9:30-5, Monday to Firday" (I was calling them Friday morning). So, I kept calling and getting the same message for another week, untill I decided to try and choose different option on the phone line (Reid's customer instead of Multimaster customer). When i got through to customer services representative, she told me that the department looking after my claim is on training and that's why their phone lines are closed. I couldn't beilive it. So, said she will pass the message on and she will pass on my suggestion on changing the recoded message to notify cusomers that the services are temporarily unavailble and when they going to be resumed.

 

Sorry for long message, but I guess I was trying to make a point that Multimaster seems to be employing strategy of dragging it as long as possible with every step of the claim in the hopes that customer would get fed up and drop the claim.

What I am wondering about is weather they can be sued for not dealing with claims in more effecient manner and less time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, OMG!! What I nightmare for both of you, I would be tearing my hair out by now! Lesson 1....never ever buy insurance offered by the store for any kind of product, inc sofa's & electrical goods etc...But i'm sure you don't need me to tell you this!

 

Have either of you approached your Home insurance companies? If you have Accidental Damage cover on your Contents, they will replace the dmg'd item for you. Admittedly there will be a policy excess, & they will only replace the dmg'd item plus a maximum contribution of 50% towards the undmg'd items, but that has to be better than all this.

 

Why don't either of you approach Watchdog? I am sure they would be very interested in this appalling situation, this is far worse than the usual delays you see in claim situations. Also, to sell insurance of any kind they must be regulated, therefore I am sure the Financial Ombudsman Service would be happy to review your complaint, that's assuming you have been through their coomplaints procedures internally. If it were me, I would be going into the store & demanding a new suite now - & i wouldn't leave until I got one. After all, £150 for an Accidental Dmg policy is pretty extortionate anyway, my whole Buildings & Contents policy including Accidental Damage doesn't cost much more than that!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi

 

I am actually sitting at home now waiting for someone from MultiMaster to come and repair my sofa and I can totally relate to these stories, so I'll share mine.

 

At the beginning of March I spilt some flea drops on the sofa and it burnt the leather. We called Multi Master and they came round quite quickly and took photos, etc. They said it would take 3 hours to fix and must be done in the morning as they needed natural light. They said we should hear from them within 10 days. We didn't! My partner called them and they said they were waiting for the assessor to answer some questions. We waited another 10 days and called again. This time we were told that they didn't know if the problem was with the leather or the flea drops. If it was the leather, we weren't covered. We stewed about this for a while and my partner, still not hearing anything back from them, called and asked to speak to a manager, who said we were covered either way and signed the claim off straight away and told us to call back and let them know when we wanteded someone to come round and repair it.

 

My partner called the next day and was told that it hadn't been cleared for a technician to come round. He kicked off and eventually got told someone would come today between 8 and 6. I have taken a day's leave for this. I got a call from the repairer at 9am saying he would be round between 2 and 6 (funnily enough it was the same person who took the photos). I said then that he had originnaly said it must be done in the morning and that it would take 3 hours, but he went very vague.

 

So, I am sitting here wondering if he'll turn up at all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

he would be round between 2 and 6 (funnily enough it was the same person who took the photos). I said then that he had originnaly said it must be done in the morning and that it would take 3 hours, but he went very vague.

 

It is lighter much later at this time of year, therefore by doing it now they will still have daylight, whereas In March it would be dark by 18:00hrs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too purchased a policy through Multimaster for my leather suite at the cost of £189.

 

The zip broke and they got out of it by saying I had done it accidently and refused to honour it. I argued that I was covered for accidental damage but they still wangled out of it. This happened before the days of this great site and they would of not got away with it now.

 

Multimaster - not worth the paper it's written on:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

We purchased a three piece suite off Harveys and had it delivered March 2007. The suite was originally a beautiful cream fabric suite with recliners on every seat and cost us £1,900 with Multimaster Insurance for damage, rips etc. We also had the suite wet treated for spills etc for which we paid an extra £185.00. Now here we come to the bad bit, the suite has changed to a dirty looking suite with patches everywhere. We rang up Multimaster and asked them to come out and basicaly see if there is anything they could do under the terms of or warranty. They refused because the suite had been wet treated by Harveys!! and not damagedby say a bottle of wine or cat pee!we have a battle with Harveys going on because we have refused to take this lying down and have told Harveys to sort it out otherwise they will be took to court for good that were sold and not being fit for purpose i.e their treatent must have gone wrong in the first place. Today we had a company come round to assess our suite sent by Harveys who told this company that we had a leather suite!! oh the incompetence of Harveys. We have had some photos took yet again and we shall expect to hear from Harveys (or so we have been told) in 7-10 days about our suite). We only want our suite back to how it was when we bought it orwe want a new three piece suite. Our suite is incidentally on HP with Black Horse who don't want to kinow either as they only lent us the money. I would like to hear on this forum of others who have had such habby treatment off Harveys and Multimaster and yes I would contact Watchdog and the papers if necessary as I am spitting feathers at the moment.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...