Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
    • Thanks a lot.  I did read every single post and though the process was fairly clear at a high level, I just wanted to be sure in the areas a posted. Call it first time nerves, going down this route.  Thanks again.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Company wants copy of passport after 10 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The company I work for is a global company employing thousands.

 

 

Yesterday HR emailed us to say that it is a legal requirement to have a copy of out passports.

 

 

Can they legally demand this?

 

 

Personally I haven't got one and I was born here and am 38 years old.

 

 

Can they demand them from the people that have them?

 

 

Surely a national insurance number and paying tax proves this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, and no. No they can't demand you get a passport. But have a NINO and paying tax isn't good enough. Employers are required to have sight of documents that prove your identity and right to work in the UK. A passport is the easiest form of proof, but there are others. Explain to HR and they will tell you what will do instead. And they should have sight of the original documents too, not just copies of them. The copies they should make and put on file as evidence they have done so. Plus, naughty them, they should have done this a long time ago!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

The forum regulars will tell you more about this, but we've seen this before. Are they checking on people's right to work in the UK or something like that?

 

And have you asked HR what they will accept in place of a passport?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the absence of a Passport, other documents will suffice - normally a Full Birth Certificate plus proof of your NI number, such as your NI Card

 

Sounds like the employer may have been challenged over the immigration status of an employee and now need to prove that they conduct the necessary due diligence checks

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks like birth certificate will be the relevant document.

 

Anything else doesnt prove that you are entitled to live and work in the UK, even NI number as that could have been issued to a temporary worker.

 

Having said that, sometimes even a birth cert doent prove you are a UK national as you may not be if your parents werent.

 

There is another problem, it is unlawful to copy a UK passport so they would need SIGHT of it and make a note of the number.

 

However, as the govt doesnt use joined up thinking it still tells companies and local govet agencies to break the law by copying them.

 

Many moons ago I used to have the same propblem with my Class 1 Safety Certificate ( explosives licence) there are 2 different conditions, acquiring explosives and acquiring and keeping.

 

however, you dont need one for keeping so when it expired they tried to say I was in unlawful possesion of explosives when there is no such crime if you acquired them legally.

 

The problem in both of these cases is the assumption thaat theere is only one method of doing things when there isnt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is but even government advice tells companies and individuals to do this. I am not concerned with pasports from other countries, they have their own laws but to copy a UK passport in Britain is a breach of Crown Copyright so the penalties are not huge but nevertheless exist as it is unlawful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that it is not lawfully be reproduced (read copy a passport) but you are missing the next bit of the sentence, namely: "without the prior permission", since for the purpose that is being discussed within this thread is confirming the right to work permission to copy has been granted by the government here: https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work

 

In fact the passport office themselves advise passport holders to photocopy the passport, thus again permission has been granted to photocopy.

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK citizens have to show Birth cert and evidence of NI number Other documents not needed or not valid. So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

See what I mean about the govt giving bad or incorrect advice. This would mean that the copying of ther passport was done without permission as the reason given isnt valid! Their "factsheets" start off with the wrong assumptions and so people are forced to follow the wrong path..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is but even government advice tells companies and individuals to do this. I am not concerned with pasports from other countries, they have their own laws but to copy a UK passport in Britain is a breach of Crown Copyright so the penalties are not huge but nevertheless exist as it is unlawful.

 

I think you may be wrong on this. Every financial institution in the country prefers a copy of the passport as ID, as does every solicitor when having to prove the same. I certify copies on a regular basis and have never come across any issues. The one thing that is recommended is that copies are black and white.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK citizens have to show Birth cert and evidence of NI number Other documents not needed or not valid. So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

See what I mean about the govt giving bad or incorrect advice. This would mean that the copying of ther passport was done without permission as the reason given isnt valid! Their "factsheets" start off with the wrong assumptions and so people are forced to follow the wrong path..

 

How are you figuring that out? UK citizens have the right to work in the UK, therefore possession of a UK passport would confirm citizenship and therefore the right to work. Passports of foreign nationals entitled to work in the UK will be endorsed with that right on their own passports.

 

There are plenty of things that the government does wrong. This is not one of them. The regulations underpinning the relevant law stipulate what evidence is required and how employers are too evidence this. So the regulations give "permission" because they constitute lawful instructions of the government. The list of acceptable documents is set out in regulations and a passport is one.

 

The guidance for employers explaining what they can accept and that they must copy original documents is here http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5604096

Link to post
Share on other sites

The list of acceptable documents is here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/378926/employers_right_to_work_checklist_november_2014.pdf

It isn't limited to just Passport or BC+NI, there are lots of other combinations but those 2 are the easiest and most popular for UK citizens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CrappoMan's link isn't working for me, don't know if was this on but the list of documents if you don't have a passport (but do have unlimited right to work in the UK) - known as List A - is here:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/571001/Employer_s_guide_to_right_to_work_checks.pdf#page=26

 

So, to confuse matters even more if the OP showed his passport then that is not proof of the right to work in the UK for a UK citizen.

 

Not true. If you hold "A passport showing the holder ... is a British citizen or a citizen of the UK and Colonies having the right of abode in the UK" (to quote List A) it means you have the right to work in the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this link to avoid any further PDF/pdf issues - https://tinyurl.com/pkonvbb

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

everyone keeps quoting the wrong source of information. If you look at the legislation a UK birth certificate and UK passport are not themselves an absolute proof of right of residence or nationality according to the British Nationality Act 1981.

 

That is why I say that the govt websites give confusing and incorrect information but expect everyone to act on that duff gen.

 

same goes for proof of ID when opening a bank account. the banks are more scared of the regulator than they are of breaching other laws so they do things they arent lawfully entitled to do.

 

I cant pay my council tax without proving residence but they wont accept the council tax bill they sent me as proof of address or ID when paying it in person.

 

I also seem to have dragged this topic away from the original request for help and hopefully the OP has a birth cert and proof of NI via a tax form or the like.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

A birth certificate is not proof of identity, even if it yours.

 

Anyone can legally obtain (buy from the register of births) another person's birth certificate if they know the name of person, place of birth and the date of birth (give or take a year either side) all details shown on a birth certificate.

 

This opens another can of worms; if you show your birth certificate to HR, what is to stop someone in HR (a temp' for instance) from using your details to obtain a duplicate birth certificate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they obtain it to commit an offence than that is an offence in itself. the same would apply to using copies of any other document or even using the information on them for purposes other than that they were supplied for. A company got fined for that recently

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...