Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Registered as SORN now DVLA Fine


ghareeb1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am a new member to the forum and hope that you could help on this matter.

 

I registered my car as SORN due to Engine problems, my understanding being SORN, , is "Off Road", and had my car parked in front of my drive, until one day the council came and placed a disable sign in front of my drive to accommodate a neighbor who lives 2 doors away with a disable family member. as such i had to move/push my car and parked it on the pavement outside my house.

 

couple a days ago i came home to find a letter from DVLA stating that my vehicle had been reported to DVLA and that they have a photographic evidence with a fine of £400, which has to be paid fully and without installment option.

 

I now understand that although it's off the road, the pavement is still technically part of the public highway

 

Alternatively, should i take the pro-active approach, and contact the DVLA claiming a mis-understanding of the SORN rules and attempt to come to a compromise?

 

I am not sure what to do with this. I am planning to phone them and arrange a monthly payment as I can't afford to pay the sum in one go.

 

Help me please. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title inserted.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

...one day the council came and placed a disable sign in front of my drive to accommodate a neighbor who lives 2 doors away...

 

What do you mean 'in front of my drive' ? Do you mean across the opening of your driveway ? Do you have a dropped kerb infront of your driveway opening ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is the case, why did you move your car ?

If you have a legit driveway entrance, the council wouldn't put a disabled bay across it.

 

 

Are you sure it was the council that put the sign there ?

Or could it have been a neighbour ?

 

 

What kind of 'sign' ?

Do you mean a car's length disabled bay ?

 

You made a mistake moving your vehicle onto the public highway.

Put it back off road asap.

 

 

Do you know if the DVLA have actual proof ?

Did they put a sticker on the window of your vehicle ?

Have they sent you a photo of the vehicle 'on road' ?

 

This may seem like lots of questions, but you haven't given much info to go on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have moved the car because I didn't want to get in trouble with the council as disable bay means only for disable badge holders only.

 

I do have a legit driveway entrance with dropped kerb and the council did it as I have an email from the Technical officer ( engineer) sent to the neighbor.

 

The sign is the same one that we see in hospitals and other parking spaces designated for disable members however it's painted white.

it is a car length disable bay.

 

Now i realise that I have made a mistake by moving it but i was trying to avoid conflicts with the council and not knowing that i will be punished by DVLA.

On the DVLA letter they said that they have a photographic proof but they haven't put any stickers on the window and didn't send any photo of the car on road/pavement.

 

Thanks for your reply and I hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have moved the car because I didn't want to get in trouble with the council as disable bay means only for disable badge holders only.

 

Yes, but your car wouldn't have been in a disabled bay, would it ? It would have been on your own driveway, YOUR property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's right.

the car was kept in own driveway.

 

 

this is until I took it to a garage trying to fix the problem using recovery car service.

 

 

The car stayed with the garage for couple of weeks with no success.

 

In the meantime the council has installed the disable sign and neighbor started using the disable bay.

 

When I took the car back home ( using the recovery service again)

I just dropped it/parked the car at the nearest available space near to my house.

 

in-hindsight I didn't think that was a problem, I know now that this was a mistake.

 

At this point I just want to write to DVLA explaining the situation and maybe arrange some form of payment and would appreciate your help with a template letter/appeal against the £400.

 

stuck between council and DVLA . (I guess the law does not protect the fools)

 

your help /advise in this matter is much appreciated.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You never said any of this until now.

 

Why did you not tackle the council about the disabled bay being across your driveway ?

 

 

It is blocking access to your driveway.

 

Because of the disabled bay you couldn't put your car back on your driveway so they should be the ones paying the DVLA fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with that........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder whether it is a private driveway or just an allocated parking space which is not actually off a public road as such. One of the spaces has since been changed to disabled parking bay and when the OP parked back near this, a councils Civil Enforcement Officer has reported the car as not having current road tax.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can also check with the council to see if the application for a disabled parking space has been done properly.

 

 

If your off road parking is properly recorded (the dropped kerb should prove it) then they cant put a space in front of your driveway.

 

You have 2 separate problems and if your car was immobile leaving it on the drive wouldnt have casued you any problems as you wont have needed the access.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is too much ambiguity here from the OP.

He/she uses the terms "road", "in front of my drive" and "drive" almost interchangeably, making it impossible to determine what they are talking about (in my view).

 

The simplest way to establish if you have a defence is for you to post here the photographic evidence that you talk about (having removed any reference to any personal data, such as number plates, house numbers, etc.

 

If it's on the road or the pavement while it was SORNed, you are bang to rights, and you have to pay.

 

The disabled bay is a red herring,

UNLESS it was installed unlawfully by the council,

thereby blocking the access to your driveway.

 

Of course, this will only be relevant if you had permission to use your front garden (for example) as a driveway.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...