Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shop Direct/Very Sale of Goods Act 1979 Claim


Wilsp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2598 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a Hotpoint Cooker from Very in 2013.

 

I had a repair carried out covered by the warranty in the first year.

 

Around twelve months later the same fault occurred and I again had the fault repaired,

this time I successfully reclaimed from Very.

 

Last year had the same problem and Hotpoint came out to repair again.

 

I attempted to claim from Very but this time they refused the claim.

 

I provided all receipts and even escalated the case to executive complaints.

 

As a final decision they refused the claim and said I could go to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

I contacted the Ombudsman but they said they could not deal with the claim.

 

They recommended the Consumer Ombudsman but Shop Direct/Very is not on their list.

Is small claims my only option?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please advise what the fault was!

 

 

If it is the Heating element for Oven this is a known problem as these cookers are made by BEKO and are badged as a Hotpoint

 

 

I had the same problem with a Beko cooker and took the Retailer to court and won!

 

What you need to do is go online and check the product reveiw websites there are lots of them that deal with product groups ie Electrical Goods

 

When you have found enough evidence that suggests it an inherent faulg go back to the retailer send a letter detailing all the facts invite them to reconsider thier decision

 

If they wont budge then a Letter before Action giving them 14 days to change their response and advise you that you will start a claim in county court to recover your costs But you must be prepared to follow it through Dont Bluff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haversine, it is the microswitch in the oven door that is the problem, the fan does not come on due to the fault.

If I go through small claims (Scotland) I take it I would need to get an independent engineers report then start court proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

The same advice remains even if its a different fault to the one I had.

 

Just enter the model number etc on the product reveiw website or you can enter the details and google it if it has a history of faults it will come up

 

You have a good case under the SOGA the same fault 3 times in the past 3 years would indicate an inherent fault

 

I am not familiar with the court system in Scotland as i did mine in the UK

 

They will play hardball until the court papers land on the doormat but in my case they settled if I withdrew the action

 

You can get an independent engineers report which you will have to pay but you can add the cost to your court action if you decide to go through with it .

 

When I lived in the UK all Hotpoint products had a 5 year warranty on parts.

 

Have you paid for the last repair as yet if you have it should have been for labour only.

 

Have you still got the service reports for the current and previous jobs as you will need them as exhibits if it gets to the court stage.

 

Also if this fault keeps recurring it may be better to reject the cooker and ask for a replacement/refund if you can prove it is an inherent fault you dont want this problem every year!

 

As it is midnight in Sweden where I live I will call it a day now and it is -16c and snowing outside Will check again tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Haverson,

I have been unable to find any faults or problems with the microswitch or Cooker online.

 

It means having to get an independent engineer's report then proceeding through small claims.

 

I am wondering that because of the amount of money involved, is it worth it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...