Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA want £230 for unquoted at registration CO2 figure - advice please


NoVictim
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2625 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Newbie here, hope I am in the right place.....

 

purchased a second hand vehicle today.

 

It is a band C vehicle and as such I should pay £30 a year tax.

 

Went online to purchase to be given a price of £230 ,

 

I emailed DVLA to question this and the response I received back was

 

This vehicles CO2 emissions count was not provided when the vehicle was first registered and we are unable to ammend our records, therefore the amount payable is £230.

 

I have responded asking why they are unable to ammend their records, they do if a vehicle changes colour, is modified or has a private plate. I am yet to get a reply.

 

If I were to install a larger engine and as a result my VED cost would go up, I am sure as hell the records would be ammended in a flash.

 

If I keep this vehicle for 5 years I will have to over pay £1000 to the DVLA for the sake of a thirty second entry on their records. This seems highly unfair to me so my question is this

 

Would I be able to take the DVLA to a small claims court to rectify this situation?

Do I have to overpay for three years to reach the minimum overpayment of 500 quid to do so or can I cite that they are overcharging me currently and that over the next 5 years that will result in £1000 wrongful payment and I would like to claim that £1000 in order to pay them their overcharge with it....

 

Sorry if that does not make sense but I am fuming.

 

I know that a tax class can be changed and I cannot let them rip me off like this.

 

they are basing their charge on engine size as they say they have no CO2 figure.

 

Have just asked the vendor to send me a photo of the V5 he holds, before sending it off to DVLA.

 

This is the first ever V5 document for this vehicle, so first registration.

 

It clearly states the CO2 emissions level on there so can I assume that this figure was indeed recorded at first registration of this vehicle?

 

Can I assume that what is on the V5 is also on their records?

 

If the answer to these questions is yes

then I can only assume in disbelief that they have lied to me in writing in order to extract an unlawful amount of money from me dishonestly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for replying,

I did go there and look and there is nowhere to add the details to do it.

 

 

It advises going to the post office that deals with car tax,

but I am ringing the DVLA later today to speak to someone in person.

Will post update when I find out more.

 

Well update and upshot is that they are saying the tax class cannot be changed..

suck it up and be ripped off...

 

 

Something to do with first registration,

I am shocked at how immovable that is,

with no explanation as to why that is immovable.

Feel like I have been fobbed off.

 

 

To add insult to injury,

the green slip number,

that was perfectly acceptable on line last night to buy tax, has somehow changed.

 

 

The guy I spoke to said the number I have given is not of the most recent log book.

 

 

Weird as there has only ever been one issued,

I have the green slip number for it,

it worked last night and today they are saying its invalid...

. enough to make you go buy a donkey...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is a family friend who has sent off the yellow strip as a trader because he has sold a few vehicles.

I asked him if he sent off for a log book and he said no,

the V5 he is giving me tonight is the first registration one held by the first keeper.

 

 

I will get the green slip and he will send off the rest.

It just seems hinky that last night the 12 digit number was recognised and today after talking to the DVLA re tax class, the number is "invalid"

 

 

Rang the DVLA back to be told that is not the number they have,

have to now go to post office.

 

 

Seriously, have been driving for over 25 years and have never known such nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It belonged to a motor parts delivery company, they had for 6 years, then sold to the person I buying from a few days ago.

 

 

According to DVLA yes, the tax band it is in now is the one it has been from the start.

 

 

They are really not helpful at all so would not explain why it cannot be changed, just told me that it is what it is.

 

 

I have no choice but to pay the higher amount, although it is wrong and almost every other driver of the same vehicle as myself, gets to pay £200 less a year. Deep joy :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

It belonged to a motor parts delivery company, they had for 6 years, then sold to the person I buying from a few days ago. According to DVLA yes, the tax band it is in now is the one it has been from the start.

 

 

Is it a Light Goods Vehicle? The VED for them is £230.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be, now I feel like a dumbass. It does not state that on gov website tho, just lists year, engine size and fuel type. All the gumtree, and dealer ads for the same van states that the tax is £30 pa, so still a little confused but guess I will slink off now feeling stupid...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be, now I feel like a dumbass. It does not state that on gov website tho, just lists year, engine size and fuel type. All the gumtree, and dealer ads for the same van states that the tax is £30 pa, so still a little confused but guess I will slink off now feeling stupid...

 

 

 

As is often the case with the .gov.uk website, it should not be relied on for accurate advice. For a car, the VED would be based on the emissions, for a van based on the same vehicle it is fixed at £230.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...