Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ThamesLink Notice of intention to prosecute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. I have just joined this Forum in order to receive help and advice.

 

On 9th January I travelled from St Pancras to St Albans.

I purchased what I thought to be a return ticket (more of it later).

 

 

On my return trip on 10th, I couldn't get access through the barrier at St Albans.

 

 

The official looked at my ticket and let me through.

On exiting at St Pancras, once more my ticket didn't get accepted by the machine and I approached the staff.

 

I was told that my ticket wasn't for that day but the previous day and that I had purchased a "day return" on the 9th January.

 

 

They told me that I was going to be treated as having no ticket and the fine was going to be £21 or something to that order.

 

 

I complained as I still, in my mind, had paid for my travel albeit, now realising, for the day before.

Nonetheless, the company had had my money and me not received the service.

 

The employee put me on the side and went on asking for my home address/details etc. which I provided.

 

The employee didn't fill the top part of the form and refused to give me a copy,

and he also wanted to keep my return ticket (which I eventually managed to keep)

before asking me to continue my journey.

 

 

I objected as I hadn't even been given a copy of the "Witness Statement MG11".

I asked to take a picture of the form which he reluctantly agreed to.

 

I have now received this letter "Notice of intention to prosecute" asking me for my side of the story.

 

I intend to answer asking them first for a copy of this MG11 statement but after ...

.. how do I stand with this threatening letter and consequences?

 

Thanks for your help and comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you've managed to change what sounded like a request for a penalty fare (the £21) into a report for consideration of prosecution, and now the letter giving you notice of intent to prosecute and asking for your side of the story.

 

Does the letter say what they are intending to prosecute for (mentioning a Bylaw or statute?)

 

The thing is,

it sounds like you didn't have a valid ticket for the return trip, and it is your responsibility to ensure you hold a valid ticket.

 

There are 2 main offences you MIGHT be prosecuted for:

 

a) intent to avoid your fare (which requires them to 'show intent by you' and so you likely could defend against this), [This is the Regulation of Railways Act offence] and

 

b) failure to show a valid ticket on demand (which is a 'strict liability' offence : your intent isn't required .. what matters is if you showed a valid ticket or not * .... [this is the Bylaw offence].

 

*there are a few 'statutory defences' laid down in Bylaw 18, but 'intent' doesn't come into these.

 

So, if they were going for a prosecution for the Bylaw offence : they'd likely succeed.

 

All is not lost, though.

 

You can write back, setting out events. Y

ou can explain, and apologise, and ask if they would consider an alternative to prosecution, given you never intended to travel without a ticket.

 

Or, you can try and be all 'barrack room lawyer' and go in guns blazing, insisting on copies of an MG11, and all sorts.

 

They don't have to produce the MG11 for you (though it may feature in evidence at court, and taking that attitude of demanding it might make it more likely it does go to court) .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello BazzaS, thank you for your reply.

Letter just says that my details were taken by a Revenue Protection Inspector at St Pancras on that date at the given time.

 

"This letter is to inform you of our intention to take this case to the Magistrates Court and the enclosed form provides you with opportunity to tell us what happened from your point of view. Be honest etc."

 

The barrier inspector didn't even date the form MG11 only exact time is shown (that's when I took the picture of the form and left)

 

I realise now that paying the fee would have been the end of it but I did at the time feel very strongly about the situation.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you can "fight, fight, fight", on principle.

 

 

Yet, principle may get you a conviction if they go for a Bylaw prosecution,

if you didn't have a valid ticket and don't have a statutory defence.

 

Or you can take a moderated stance, and (re-iterating that you had no 'intent to avoid your fare')

accept that you didn't have a valid ticket,

and ask them if there is an alternative to prosecution bearing in mind:

 

a) you didn't have a valid ticket, but

 

b) the circumstances that led to that occurring.

 

Your call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

begging letter time me thinks...

 

 

apologise and grovel

and offer to pay any reasonable admin fess and any monetary value EQIV to any potential fine

to keep your name clean from prosecution as this would terminate prospective employment in your field. etc etc

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello all. Deepest apologies for not having posted the outcome.

 

I wrote a letter as recommended but not so much a crawling letter. Just matter of fact, I bought a return ticket (albeit a day return ticket) and it was my mistake. However, your company did get the money for a return trip ....

 

They dropped all charges. Best regards to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...