Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA - Impounded and crushed an old car of mine, Im being chased.


awat77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am new to this forum, but have a problem that I am really stuck on, and hoping someone can help me.

 

I purchased a car on 27/7/2015,

not long after this problems started occuring with the engine,

I mentioned that it was the head gasket.

However I was re-assured this was not the case,

 

 

after numerous trips to and back from the garage due to this problem,

eventually it turns out the head gasket was broken

and it wasnt possible to repair the vehicle and a full refund would be provided this was the 28/9/2015.

 

After numerous calls, and letters (which were returned),

I eventually having to send 2 at a time with proof of posting and not requesting a signature as I knew these would be returned.

 

 

It seems they were not readily going to give any form of refund for the vehicle,

the money owed being £1090 and £200 for a part ex vehicle.

 

As im with Santander I was able to reclaim the £1090 I paid, via the chargeback scheme which they offer, however the £200 did not arrive for the part ex car.

 

I duely contacted the DVLA,

explaining everything and placed a SORN on the car,

as I was told it wasnt possible to fix the car

and my belief was that it would remain in the garage until resolved

and that it would not be driven.

 

I spoke with CAB and they stated I have to goto a resolution dispute as the courts like that,

when you try to resolve out of court.

 

 

I contacted them and sent all the relevant details including proof (As I happened to record most of my calls as it didnt take long to realise they were acting dodgy).

 

 

I knew it would take a while to hear anything back,

not long after I went through a lot of personal issues which meant I had totally forgot about everthing that was going on..

 

Jump to just over a year later and I have now received a letter stating it was found on a road, with SORN and has been taken away and crushed,

 

 

the DVLA are wanting £449 from me for this before they take me to court.

I have spoke with CAB and they cannot advise me what to do as its a unique case.

 

My issue it that the car is now insured,

which I know for certain isnt through myself

and has been insured after my SORN,

 

 

I have not sent anything to state i am no longer the registered keeper as there is still money owed to me,

 

 

its a catch 21 (I either say its not mine anymore and their is no reason for them to pay me whats still owed to me, then there is the fact that they can do whatever they want with it which they have done as its been found on a road and im liable).

 

have been told my DVLA,

I either pay or put litigation in and get threatened with court action....

 

Unsure what to do, as noone seems to be able to help.

 

I know that if I pay the money,

its goiung to be very difficult to get it back from the dealer.

(Just look for Sandmoor motors, Batley online, yes my mistake i didnt do this before buying the car)

 

Any advice would be more than apporeciated, if you need further details please let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you never sent the V5C off?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I advised the DVLA and in writing (I cannot find proof of this), the reasoning why I was declaring SORN, that it was returned to the garage. The letter had to have been received as they put it on SORN and refunded my car tax.

 

The garage stated it was not possible to repair, so I presumed it wouldnt be roadworthy, hence it wouldnt be driven away at all.

 

I didnt return the V5C as they still owed money on the car, which I was going to get back via the ombudsman, if I compoleted the V5C then they could have said that the car was theirs and they wouldnt need to return the money they owe to me.

 

 

I never for once thought they would drive it without my permission and store it on a public highway away from the garage,

Link to post
Share on other sites

providing correct details to the DVLA has nothing to do with a contractual matter under the sale of Goods Act with a dodgy garage. Returning the V5 was never going to affect the rights or wrongs of the blown engine claim and anyway, there are such things as photocopiers.

As you say, you are still the registered keeper

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that this has nothing to do with it, but just wanted to explain the situation, the fact that I had not given permission for anyone except myself to drive the car however, is this not a criminal act, or is their some sort of loophole they can use.

 

As far as im concered the car was to remain at the garage until i got the money back, whereas the ownership could be changed, however I gave no permision for that car to be taken...

 

Any advice would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant really see anything you can do.

unless you want to litigate the garage.

 

but you've still gotta pay the DVLA regardless

then get that moneyback out the garage as well..

 

they were quite entitled to move your car

 

you should have sent the v5c off instead of sorn.

 

not owning the car never could have had any bearing on you getting money back for a part ex off em anyway

 

they took you for a fool in the first place

then you again left yourself wide open

and they spotted they could further screw you by putting the car out on a road.

after you charged back the money

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To follow up:

 

I have spoken with CAB again, then the consumer helpline.

 

They have stated although im the registered keeper, this means that the DVLA has someone to chase, and that aslong as I can prove the car was not in my possession then I can place litigation.

 

They have advised the garage has a duty of care to the vehicle while in their possession this includes driving from once side of the fourcourt to the other and taking for a test drive if the vehicle is repaired, there was no repair and so the vehicle shouldnt have been driven.

 

I have been told that aslong as I have relevant proof the car was at the garage, and I can proof this to the courts if need be then I shouldnt have a problem.

 

Writing my letter today to the DVLA, but ive been informed it has to be worded correctly, unsure however if recorded conversations over the phone would work as this is my main proof I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...