Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GREENBELT Action GROUP in Scotland


garding1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2602 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

 

I am in a similar position to many of you having been in court 5 times in the last 6 months following my decision to defer payment of £175 (one year fee) until Greenbelt could provide me of evidence to exactly what I was paying for.

 

 

My 6th Hearing has been set for April 2017 following continuous adjournment requests from Greenbelt as they clearly do no want to face me in a hearing given the negligence and fraud allegations I am making against, all of which they have failed to respond to in over 4 months.

 

As I live in Scotland,

I have also applied to the Homeowners Housing Panel to take Greenbelt to Tribunal on the basis they have failed to adhere to the Factors Code of Conduct Act 2011.

I am currently awaiting a date to be set.

 

I would recommend anyone else in Scotland Google Factors Code of Conduct Act 2011 and have a look at the process, to see if it is worth their while applying also, it really depends on the strength of your individual case / evidence.

 

I would recommend you get your local MP involved in the matter as there at least 30 nationwide who are currently assisting their own constituents on the matter.

 

Thanks, Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Having been in court 5 times in the last 6 months following my decision to defer payment of £175 (one year fee) until Greenbelt could provide me of evidence to exactly what I was paying for.

 

My 6th Hearing has been set for April 2017 following continuous adjournment requests from Greenbelt as they clearly do no want to face me in a hearing given the negligence and fraud allegations I am making against, all of which they have failed to respond to in over 4 months.

 

As I live in Scotland,

I have also applied to the Homeowners Housing Panel to take Greenbelt to Tribunal on the basis they have failed to adhere to the Factors Code of Conduct Act 2011.

I am currently awaiting a date to be set.

 

I would recommend anyone else in Scotland Google Factors Code of Conduct Act 2011 and have a look at the process, to see if it is worth their while applying also, it really depends on the strength of your individual case / evidence.

 

I would recommend you get your local MP involved in the matter as there at least 30 nationwide who are currently assisting their own constituents on the matter.

 

thanks, Gary

Edited by Andyorch
Link added as permission requested
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Positive 1,

 

i am on one of the six estates you refer to above, I am also the individual who was advise by Santander that your legal cover in home insurance would cover you for this as it is impacting your estate and mortgage conditions, I..e. Title deeds.

 

I have also been in court on 5 separate occasions to date, during which greenbelt and bto solicitors have sought and been awarded continuous adjournments.

I would strongly recommend you have a look at the homeowners rights network webpage and join the social media group as there are almost 700 people in a similar situation to you, who are all actively helping each other.

 

Thanks, Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...