Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
    • Confirmed with Central Contact Centre that the hearing is 24th, disappointed I can't speak directly with the local county court I have to email the local court apparently is the only way. The agent couldn't explain the discrepancy between the two letters, she sounded very confused. If they were identical letters in wording but only dates were different I would feel ok, slightly worried the wording differs...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

I was caught shoplifting in Debenhams worth £280 .The police was called.I was not arrested as i had a child with me.

Its my first time offence and was petrified.

I pleaded and Cried and was willing to pay the Amount.They finally agreed for me to pay the amount and close it.

I paid the full amount and left.

 

Was told i am banned from Debenhams.I have not signed any document with Debenhams or Police.

 

I did not have my ID with me.I gave my Name and Date of Birth .I Did not sign any document.The police told they needed details for record purpose.

The police told me i was very lucky as Debenhams told them they did not want to pursue the matter further.

 

What will happen next.Can they still take any action on me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing will happen. Police came, decided not to.do anything. You paid for the goods and they're now yours.

 

Debenham don't want to pursue further.

 

Think about why you did it, don't do it again and move on with your life

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

While what you did was wrong, identifying the reasons behind your poor choice is paramount to avoid making this choice again. It may help you to speak to your GP as they may have answers for you. The GP will treat everything you say in confidence.

 

From your initial post, you gave your name and date of birth but not your home address to Debenhams. IF that is the case then I suspect nothing further will happen. The reason I say this is because Debenhams use a company called Retail Loss Prevention to chase for 'compensation'. If you get anything in the post from them, DO NOT pay but come here first where we will be able to assist.

 

The police won't take any further action as Debenhams have told them not to.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

police have dealt with the matter as local restitution as they are entitled to. That is the end of things, no-one else can interfere with that, Debenhams cant change their minds, the police cant suddenly revisit the decision and certainly companies like RLP cannot tell anyone that you owe them money .

You have hopefuly learned your lesson and you can now forget about it. As for the ban, it doesnt matter that you didnt sign an agreement, if you go there again and get recognised you will be courting trouble so keep away for a goodly length of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As per the others, don't think RLP will be in touch, they are powerless even if they did.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As per the others, don't think RLP will be in touch, they are powerless even if they did.

 

Police have taken my Name ,Date of Birth and Address along with my sons .Can i still be arrested or issued court summons now.

I remember they told me i was lucky as they left me because of the child.

 

I think they told they needed my details for some record but no further action will be taken.What does this mean ?

 

I donot have the receipt of the Bill but its shown in my statement on the amount debited.I am still not able to sleep remembering the incidents that happened.I always dream police is coming to arrest me.

 

I have my visa for renewal soon.I am so worried about all this.I have a well paid job.Its totally worthless how i messed up everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of threads here where people had the same question about Visa's and they were OK however, the police were not involved in those cases.

 

In general, people who have been convicted of a crime may have some difficulty renewing a visa however as the police officers decided not to take action you may be fine.

I think I read somewhere that when a person is imprisoned for more than 12 months they become liable for deportation. This has not happened to you.

 

They took your details for their records so that if you did commit another offence, they could then see a pattern. This information will be kept on a database and may be disclosed on an enhanced DBS check by an employer. This depends on the job and the discretion of the Chief Constable who will decide if it is relevant or not.

 

This is what MIGHT happen. Nothing is definite.

 

Have you been to see your doctor? This feeling of dread is doing you no good and you may need help coming to terms with what you did. Do you have a partner? Have you confided in him/her?

 

On the assumption that Debenhams have truly dropped the matter and the police deciding not to take any action, I feel you should be OK. The thing I believe you need to do is talk. Partner/GP/friend. Talking does work.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...