Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have you asked for advice from your students union people? HB
    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Watch out for Nationwide buffer


determindator
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nationwide allow customers to utilise their accounts above arranged overdrafts or even if there is no overdraft.

 

Would be helpful if customers were not charged for this but you will be.

It's what they call a buffer and help if needed.

 

Each transaction will cost you £15.

I know someone who made a cash withdrawal for £70, and two small shop transactions less than £10 each.

 

They are going to be charged £15 for each of these transactions.

They did not ask for this service and would have preferred the system didn't allow the transactions.

 

They could have used another account but used this particular card thinking there was more money available.

 

Rant to you NW bank charges just keep finding their way into your life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem a few years ago. I used the card three times and was charged for going over my overdraft limit and for the three transactions. I complained saying it was an oversight on my part that was put right the following day from monies in my other Nationwide accounts, if they had a system in place telling me I'd overdrawn I wouldn't have done it. I also threatened to take my custom elsewhere. To their credit they reimbursed me for all the costs even the interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The person is requesting a refund considering there were other accounts which could have been used instead. £15 per transaction is a very high interest rate.

 

I have also been successful in the past Soggy with Nationwide but they are sticklers for refunding only once in a year.

 

They have a good mobile phone alert service which is not advertised well enough. It alerts if you over your limit and gives you up to 2.30pm that day to cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well, well. I understand the banks will be made to ensure mobile phone alerts are sent to all bank account customers to make them aware of their balance and transactions and giving the chance to pay in by a certain time to correct and avoid fees and charges.

 

It's about time customers were protected more to avoid bank charges. Banks promote the ethos you are responsible but haven't actioned enough ways to help you do this in the busy unpredicable world we live in. The alert system is a good step in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The txt alert service is flawed or by human design txt alerts are not being sent out when they should be. This of course is causing customers not to be advised money needs to be paid in to avoid charges. How are banks getting away with charging customers £15 and the transaction e.g is for £2! It's detrimental and a penalty or why is it done?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...