Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NatWest and the removal of benefit money.


RaeUK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes, that's about the top and the tail of it, Lapsed. I would expect the account to show DWP money going into it with two different NI numbers and for any transfer to coincide and corroborate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding this first period - The action she took to get back on an even keel resolved the problem and to all intents and purposes there should have been no further immediate cause for concern.

 

Were any arrangements made or advice given by the bank at that time to ensure that a similar situation would not develop again with payments on the credit card account?

 

In the meantime steps were taken by the daughter to try and safeguard her son's disability benefits payments by transferring them to the savings account, steps that would have been obvious to the bank had they shown due diligence and exercised their duty of care before emptying said savings account.

 

Not being nosey or difficult. Trying to compose a formal letter asking for a reconsideration of the decisions that the bank took. The sequence of events need to be clear in order to show that the bank acted illegally according BCOBS by not exercising their duty of care. I read that somebody sued on the strength of that legal requirement and was well compensated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, you're being neither nosey nor difficult, just helpful and patient.

 

 

Anything I'm not aware of / privy to I will need to ask my sister.

(It is just her and her son we are discussing here, just to clarify, no daughter).

 

My understanding is that she was having difficulties,

was advised by the bank just to pay what she could.

 

 

This she did for a while but still managed to miss a total of two payments.

 

 

The bank told her to pay all outstanding sums within two days.

This she did.

 

 

Now, at that point, everything was then up to date, she had caught up her payments with a lump sum payment.

 

 

No mention then of an intent to close the account the next day.

 

 

As far as she was aware, provided she continued to make regular payments, then things had been caught up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Natwest...although the subject is with regards to benefit monies...better placed in the Banking forum for the correct advice.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ReaUK

I have attempted to compose a letter for resolving your sister's issues with the bank using the facts that I have as I understand them.

 

Obviously if you choose this course of action feel free to add to, omit or correct anything that I have written. This is basically an example of the flavour or tone that such a letter could take if you, or your sister, were inclined towards this course of action.

 

 

The Manager

Such & Such Bank

Address

 

 

Re: Removal of Savings Accrued in Savings Account to Off-Set Shortfall in Credit Account.

 

Dear Manager,

I write to formally bring to your attention my dissatisfaction with the inconsideration, unfairness and indifference that the bank has shown in emptying and closing the savings account that I used exclusively for my son's disability benefits. The following is a recounting of the sequence of events that led up to the current impasse and I ask that you reconsider your decision.

 

Over a year ago when I realised that I was having difficulties keeping up with the payments on my credit card I contacted the bank and was told not to be overly concerned as I would be given time to catch up. I was advised to keep paying whatever I could afford each month in the meantime so that there would be no default on my account.

 

I kept in touch with the bank's customer services people, not always the same ones, who kept assuring me that everything was fine and to keep paying as I was doing. I followed this advice but still missed two payments in total.

 

On the occasion of my last call the tone and attitude of the customer service person who answered was decidedly cool. I was informed that I needed to catch up with all payments within two days.

 

I scraped the requisite amount together and was able to meet the deadline.

 

Having satisfactorily overcome the difficulty of the moment and with no alternative plan, proposal, suggestion or advice, I was resolved to continue, as was previously agreed and accepted between the bank and myself, to fulfil my obligations regarding the upkeep of my credit card account.

 

Shortly after this, the condition of my son, who suffers from a disability, deteriorated. Needless to say this placed additional strains on my ability to provide adequately for us both and I was compelled to seek help in the form of social security benefits for the purpose of alleviating and improving his condition. To this end I applied for and was successful in obtaining the requisite benefits on behalf of my son, to wit, Personal Independence Payments and Carer's Allowance.

 

Those benefits then began to be paid into my bank account.

 

Conscious of my duty and responsibility for ensuring the proper stewardship of said benefits money I undertook to transfer it to a savings account where, being apart from any other money, it would only be available and used for the purposes for which it was intended, the major one being additional accommodation needs. The money was allowed to accumulate in the savings account because a substantial sum would be necessary to pay for the alternative arrangements more suited to his needs once such arrangements were put in place. Progress on those arrangements was nearing a satisfactory conclusion.

 

It was with abject consternation then that I recently learned that the said savings account has been completely emptied of funds. This was done arbitrarily by the bank, without either consultation or notification.

 

Needless to say, this action by the bank will have dire consequences on my son's life.

 

On the basis of the facts as I have outlined then above I ask that the bank reconsiders its decision to act as it has and to restore to my son his rightful dues.

 

Furthermore, in reconsidering the bank's decision, I ask that the bank give due regard to my rights and entitlements as a customer under The Financial Conduct Authority's Banking Conduct of Business Sourcebook (BCOBS), which stipulate among other things:

 

The new banking conduct regime comprises:

 

  • the conduct of business requirements in the Payment Services Regulations 2009, which apply to payment service providers, including banks, e-money institutions, and payment institutions conducting payment services, including the provision and operation of "payment accounts" within the scope of the Payment Services Directive
  • full application of the FSA's Principles for Businesses to the regulated activities of accepting deposits and issuing e-money as a retail banking service (to the extent that these do not conflict with the PSRs)
  • the Banking Conduct of Business sourcebook (BCOBS) containing high-level rules and guidance
  • monitoring and enforcement by the FSA of the retail banking regulatory framework which in the case of the conduct of business requirements of the PSRs will be "complaints-led" (i.e. based primarily on information received from customers and other interested parties)
  • the availability of the right of action under section 150 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 in relation to breaches of BCOBS rules.

Principle 6 requires a bank to pay due regard to the interests of its customers and to treat them fairly. In particular, a bank should deal fairly with a banking customer whom it has reason to believe is in financial difficulty.

Those extracts clearly indicate that the bank has a duty of care. Furthermore, it is a legal obligation. As such those are implied terms of my contract with the bank and failure to adhere to them may be regarded as a breach of contract, actionable at law.

 

The bank will hold records of every transaction in or out and between any and all of my accounts with it. Even a cursory glance at those records will show my financial situation and the origins of the funds involved in those transactions.

 

I look forward to a favourable response to this letter and a reconsidered course of action to bring the current state of affairs to an amicable conclusion. Obviously any further action, including legal action, I choose to take will rest on your response.

 

I remain, etc. etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...