Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCS/WY/Gladstones? claim form - Multiple PCN's - £600 from 2015 **DISMISSED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2578 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone help?

 

Parking Notices

– Asking to pay up where the claimant has instructed solicitors for collection of non payment of parking notices.

 

I am in dispute of number of parking tickets which arrived one after another.

I don’t believe the parking company have followed their own procedures correctly in terms of them issuing the tickets to me.

 

 

I have written to the Parking Collection Services in Newcastle last Xmas (2015) asking for proof that I have parked at this place more than the required time.

 

 

They have failed to provide me the evidence.

 

 

I have received numerous letters from them asking to pay up but I ignored as they have not provided me with the evidence that I requested.

 

Now I am in a very difficult situation where they say I owe them £600 in parking fines, £47.38 interest costs, £60 in court fees and £70 in legal representative.

Total amount owing is £777.38

 

I have very limited time to response.

 

Can someone please help me what I need to do as

 

 

I am in dispute of the tickets and the timing that I was parked more than the allocated time.

 

 

There is no CCTV in operation at the car park.

 

Help will be greatly appreciated.

 

Regards - IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so you have a blue N1 Claim form from Nothants bulk Court?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get moving if its a claim form IKI...

there are strict deadlines....

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for your advice. I am totally new to using the Consumer Action Group. I am totally clueless.

 

I have received black and white N1SDT Claim form.

 

 

The claimant is WY Parking Enforcement Limited.

 

 

They have instructed their Solicitors (Gladstones Solicitors Limited) to chase up the parking debt.

The claim from I have received is dated 22 Dec 2016 which I received on 24 Dec 2016.

 

 

I am totally confused with deadlines to be met.

They are asking me to pay up in total £777.38 which is made up as follows (£600 in parking fines, £47.38 in interests, £60 court fee and legal representative costs of £70).

 

I dispute the parking tickets which has been issued to me since Nov 2015.

I have previously written to the debt collection agency to give me proof that I have been parked here more than the allocated time.

Nothing has been forth coming.

 

 

Now I am in situation where they are demanding £777.38 and N1SDT claim form is issued to me.

 

Can please someone help me out.

I am totally clueless that is happening.

I am totally stress out and now unable to sleep.

Assistance/help will be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

 

What do I need to do next? I am finding this site extremely difficult to follow? Please help anyone.

 

The next thing will be to acknowledge the claim, someone will tell you how long you have. Here's a link to the forum sticky on claims from parking companies, that should help you to start understanding the process.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***Updated-Aug-2016***

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep going IKI

just follow the emails you get

easy to help as long we have the info

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

 

The next stage is to acknowledge the claim. Does that mean I manually complete the form which is page 2 of N9SDT and post it off recorded delivery or do I do it on-line? What is best for me?

 

 

Also what does it mean I intend to contest jurisdiction?

 

 

Many thanks for your assistance.

 

 

IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there again

 

 

To acknowledge online, I have my Claim Number and password.

 

 

On MCOL which box do I register? Box 1, Box 2 or Box 3. Please advice.

 

 

First time with legal issues...been stressful...but having the courage and motivation to go to the end.

 

 

Many thanks for assistance.

 

 

Regards IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a claim form for Private Land Parking Enforcement.

 

Name of the Claimant ? - WY Parking Enforcement Limited

 

 

Date of issue? - 22 Dec 2016

 

What is the claim for –

 

 

1. The driver of the vehicle registration ***** (the Vehicle) incurred parking charges(s) on

26/11/2015, 25/11/2015, 30/11/2015 and 01/12/2015 for breaching the terms of parking on the land at 49-57 Great Horton Road, Bradford. BD7 1AZ.

2.The defendant was driving the vehicle and/or is the keeper of the vehicle and the claimant claims £600 for parking charges / damages and indemnity costs if applicable,

together with interest of £47.38 pursuant to s69 of the county court act 1984 at 8% pa,

continuing to judgment at 13.16 per day.

 

What is the value of the claim? £777.38

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? Don't know? The claimant is WY Parking Enforcement Limited. They have instructed Glasdstones Solicitors Limited who is claimant's legal representative.

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I don't understand this question? Can someone please help?

Regards - IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

register as an individual

note the long number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

 

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

 

.

don't sign anything

 

.

here is the CPR 31:14

 

 

to the solicitors

[Your address]

.

[Their address [solicitors]

.

[Date]

.

Dear Sir or Madam,

.

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

.

CPR 31.14 Request

.

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county court.

.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

.

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

.

1. the contract between [parking company name] and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and make claims in their own name,.

.

2.proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007

.

3.copies of the notice to driver, notice to keeper and any other correspondence from [insert Claimant Name] & [insert Solicitors Name} to the defendant that they intend to rely upon in court.

.

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are disclosed at your earliest convenience..

.

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy.

.

Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

.

If you are unable to comply with this request within 14 days and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request please confirm in your response.

.

Yours faithfully

.

TYPE YOUR NAME DO NOT SIGN IT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, is the place you parked the Uni car park?

the signage at the entrance just says private land,

no mentuion of any contract, penalty etc.

 

 

Decent pictures of the signage will be invaluable

along with an argument about what these signs represent and that is precious little from my armchair.

 

Tell us all about everything,

including what papwerwork you received and what you sent back to them and copies of what you have still got.

 

 

I would bet that their notices are as rubbish as their signage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

 

 

Many thanks for your assistance.

 

 

For information - as requested, I have acknowledge the service on MCOL.

 

 

I have also written the letter and send it to the Claimant solicitor.

 

 

My next question is what do I need to do next and how long do I have to do it in, bearing in mine the time limit?

 

 

Many thanks for your assistance, much appreciated.

 

 

IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

defence not due till by 4pm Monday 23rd jan.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks DX. Much appreciated.

 

 

In the meantime, I will write up my defence.

 

 

Can I put my defence on thread for you to check? Is that allowable? Please advice?

 

 

Many thanks again. Kind regards - IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

The brief almost 2 line def will do

Lots here already

Yes post it up

 

Action post 15 first mind

We need photos

 

Not too happy on the change of parking co name either

That needs looking into

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get decent pictures of the signage at the site,

 

take a photo of every different sign and pay attention to how big the signs are,

how high above the road they are and the size of the writing.

 

You might want to take a tape measure.

Also photograph the entrance to the private land from the public highway so we can see what a driver would see entering the land.

 

We also need to know the dates and times of the parking events and see the paperwork you have received from the parking co and also want to know what exactly you said to them and when you said it

 

. You may have protection under the POFA from having any liability in this matter at all but if you identified yourself as the driver when you wrote to them that law is now redundant

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi DX100uk

 

 

I hope all is well.

 

 

Thread 17 - I have received the response from solicitor today as it states as follows:

 

 

We write to your recent part 31.14 request

We refer you to the Civil Procedure Rules 31.14 (1) (a) where it is stated "A party may inspect a document mentioned in - a statement of case"

As the documents you have requested are not mentioned in our clients statement of case, these document will not be provided.

Further, in respect of the sum claimed we trust you agree this case may inevitably be allocated to the Small Claims track, whereby part 13.14 request also do not apply.

 

 

DX100uk - what do I do now?

 

 

Thread 15 - photos

I have the pics...how do I upload onto thread? Please advice.

Many thanks for your assistance. Much appreciated. Regards IKI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Click upload in your post

 

Letter can be ignored and will be made ref to later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDF please so we can zoom

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...