Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VWFS and Equifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2655 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had car finance with VWFS,

in 2011 I wanted to sell the car and settle the finance,

I asked for a settlement figure which they provided.

 

 

I paid the settlement figure and obtained a letter stating they had no interest in the vehicle.

 

On Equifax (via clearscore) it shows very oddly that I was a month behind from June 2011 until mid 2012,

I settled with them the day I sold the vehicle.

 

On Noddle it shows that there was a balance of 13 grand still during that period.

 

 

I have raised disputes with both agencies.

 

 

If VWFS fail to respond to the agencies do they have to remove the information?

(20 days in and nothing yet from VWFS)

 

Thanks,

 

Terry

Link to post
Share on other sites

send a copy of the letter to VWFS

give them 14 days to remove the incorrect markers

else you will escalate your complaint to the ICO

and also seek financial compensation for the damage these markers have caused.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice, VWFS have replied to Equifax and have simply confirmed the information is correct with no explanation at all :-(

 

I have replied as you suggested and also sent a copy of the letter/attached it to the dispute on

 

Noddle have come back and VWFS have given them the same one line reply that the information is correct.

 

I have also replied as per your advice to them, lets see what they come back with.

 

I'm going to try and ring VWFS and see how they can justify their claims, there is no way they would write a letter saying they have no financial interest in a vehicle with 13 grand owing on it, grrrrrrr

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoken with VWFS, and the finance department who deals with disputes are now off until January!

 

From the notes she can see I had settled,

they say I cancelled my debit after settling but there was a payment due hence showing a month in arrears,

she can't explain the balance of 13 grand.

 

Nowhere on their letter did it say I had to make further payments

nor was I advised of such at the time,

 

 

they admit they have never written to me about this outstanding amount which was £379 a single payment not 13 grand.

According to the notes they decided to write the amount off in 2012 hence ending the account.

 

I guess worst case if they amend it 379 looks better than 13 grand

but I feel its a bit unfair as it's their error really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems strange that when you asked for a settlement figure that any outstanding payments would have been included the figure owed.

 

 

Of course they may have done that at the time and not been picked up by Accounts.

 

You could also ask which payment was missing and then ask your bank for the statement for that month to confirm whether you did pay it at the time.

 

 

But if you still have the letter stating that you no longer owed any money that should settle things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have provided the letter to both equifax and callcredit,

 

in their e-mails to both agencies VWFS admit that the balance on the account is wrong yet they won't amend it,

 

I have pointed this out to both that the minimum that should be done is for them to correct the balance and prove that they have ever asked me for that payment,

 

I think it's a tad unfair that they expect me to be mystic,

I believed at the time that what I was paying was full and final settlement,

they didn't inform me otherwise so that's their mistake surely.

 

The credit agency says I should go to the financial ombudsman,

I have seen the ICO mentioned on here....which one should I go to?

 

Many thanks,

 

Terry

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS used to charge £550 back in 2014 to investigate complaints against companies.

I imagine that figure would be higher now.

 

I shouldn't think that VWS would be stupid enough to argue this case when they are obviously in the wrong so would probably amend your report rather than pay up.

 

Should they cave in it is up to you to decide whether to push to get compensation for their error and saying you owe £13000 when the figure at most is less than £400 is a big error.

 

Did you check with your bank to see if they had paid that outstanding amount since if you had that would compound their error.

 

On the other hand the ICO does deal with data protection and while they don't seem to charge companies for their investigations, they are pretty strong in dishing out fines

 

Whether they also suggest possible financial compensation I don't know but perhaps the threat of a large fine may be enough for CWS to settle with you.

 

Perhaps other with more knowledge of both organisations could also advise you.

 

I am bound to say that I am surprised that VWS have not amended your credit report.

 

It may be that Noddle are culpable too.

I don't see how they can just take the word of their client in the face of your evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

My bank didn't make any further payments to them,

it's all a bit odd as finance companies are normally quick to send you a reminder should you be behind,

 

I have put my complaint to the ICO and fingers crossed something might happen soon.

 

It would be interesting to know when they entered this data as maybe they have done this long after the event after realising an error by their accounts team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...