Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS and wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided?. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What is a Bond?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Probably the wrong forum but don't know where else to put this.

 

On Friday I received a letter from the DWP. Enclosed was a letter from the same pension company that my (very modest) lump sum pension payment came from a few months back. Same company, different department it would seem.

 

Anyway, the letter reads:

 

Dear X

 

Our Ref: Final Salary XXXXX

 

Dear Mrs X

 

Bond: 123456/1 (not the real reference number)

 

There is a benefit due to you for the above bond.

 

Now, I'm very intrigued and of course, it arrives on the Friday and I can't find out what it is until tomorrow.

 

I do remember some 30 years ago when the company I worked for had a meeting with some financial advisor for everyone them extolling the virtues of the pension plan they'd chosen for us - in their own words at the time - the best money could buy.

 

I have vague recollections of the advisor saying something about investing a portion of our pensions in the pension scheme itself and something about the remainder but what exactly I can't recall.

 

Anyway, despite searching the Net for information about Bonds, most of them seem to relate to American Bonds and the only information I can get for this country are ISAs. Whatever this Bond is, it was long before ISAs.

 

If anyone can shed any light on this, please let me know otherwise I will have to kick my heels until tomorrow.

 

Not clued up on financial institutions or products I'm afraid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you work for a gov't / public utility and opt out of gov't scheme? [superannuation etc]

 

 

this would have been in the 1990's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bond "should" be a Gov backed security, that pays a fixed return per annum. The general rule of thumb is that when interest rates are rising then the price/value of bonds will fall, and if you are living through low interest rates the price/value rises as the bond offers better return than sitting in a bank would.

 

Basically, they are among the safest places to invest your money for a low risk investor, however the current returns offered by bonds are pitiful Imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you work for a gov't / public utility and opt out of gov't scheme? [superannuation etc]

 

 

this would have been in the 1990's?

 

No. Worked for the gov in the 1970s and that one's already taken care of.

 

During the 1980s and 1990s I worked in the oil industry and this one, I think relates to when I worked for one of the largest offshore contractors in the world - an American company.

 

Thanks also to WarrenBuffet for explaining a Bond.

 

When I find out tomorrow what this is, I'll let you know but whatever it is, it certainly isn't something I was expecting or even knew I had.

 

Think I'll go and play my piano - less painful than kicking my heels :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may very well have a high yielding bond 6%>, that may very well be a very valuable asset and highly liquid in the current economic situation.

The questions you need to ask is, 1.) What is the % yield on the bond?

2.)How many more years are left on the bond?

3.) What is it's current market value and is it one bond or 100's or 1000's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...