Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Corp harassing me for debt I owe. What are my options? Help would be great


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2697 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello my name is Katie, I have a crap situation going on help would be appreciated.

 

I live in the UK, I took out a credit card in Australia in 2015. Now credit corp is harassing me, calling my work, which I filled a harassment claim so they gave my information to their manager so know she is emailing me and as I gave her my mobile number she is going to call me on Tuesday. Do you this k I need to pay this debt back its €5,580 dollars so about £3000 pound. I've went to citizens advice but I still don't know what to do. I really don't want to pay it but scared it gets passed to UK debt collectors. Help.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that we don't get into debt avoidance on this forum. We help people from a practical point of view if there are sound legal reasons for not repaying a debts

 

If you owe the money and you have the money then you should repay it.

 

On the other hand, if there are legal reasons for not paying then we would be pleased to explore them with you. If you have now put them on notice – in writing that they are no longer to call you at work then they should not ignore this instruction.

 

Keep detailed notes of all attempts to contact you on this.

 

If you incurred a debt in Australia, then if they wanted to make legal trouble for you they would have to issue a claim in Australia, get a judgement there, transfer the judgement to the UK, have it recognised in the UK and then have enforced against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit corp have issued UK court claims via Stevensdrake Solicitors before, without having an Aussie court judgement. They use a court case from about 1972 as a precedent, where UK courts will consider enforcing foreign debts. But in the case i remember, they did not continue with the court claim, as there were issues in Australia that had not been dealt with and the debtor did not have money/assets to pay the debt. There is a debt agreement between Commonwealth countries, which makes it easier for them, so you should not presume that they could not enforce the debt in the UK, if they believed you could pay it.

 

If there are any issues to raise such as any excessive charges added or you want a copy of the original agreement you signed, then it might be worth asking about these. Once you establish how they can contact you, they will continue to make contact and at some point advise they will pass it to UK Solicitors.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case precedent used to enforce foreign debts in the UK is Maharanee of Baroda Wildenstein [1972] QB 283

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit corp have issued UK court claims via Stevensdrake Solicitors before, without having an Aussie court judgement. They use a court case from about 1972 as a precedent, where UK courts will consider enforcing foreign debts. But in the case i remember, they did not continue with the court claim, as there were issues in Australia that had not been dealt with and the debtor did not have money/assets to pay the debt. There is a debt agreement between Commonwealth countries, which makes it easier for them, so you should not presume that they could not enforce the debt in the UK, if they believed you could pay it.

 

If there are any issues to raise such as any excessive charges added or you want a copy of the original agreement you signed, then it might be worth asking about these. Once you establish how they can contact you, they will continue to make contact and at some point advise they will pass it to UK Solicitors.

 

The case precedent used to enforce foreign debts in the UK is Maharanee of Baroda Wildenstein [1972] QB 283

 

Thank you.

 

 

I didn't know any of this so kittykat400 had better look into it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...