Jump to content



firstship
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A default should only remain on your credit file for six years, yes you're correct.

 

You should raise the issue with the CRA who is processing inaccurate data.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

its better to write to the bank

copy them the letter of default

 

 

give them 14 days to remove the whole account as it was defaulted more than 6yrs ago and should now not be showing.

or you'll complain to the ICO and seek compensation too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must also attach a copy of the original default notice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am sure somebody has asked this question,but I cannot find it.

 

Why are CRAs allowed to record data from a third party (ie Bank) and yet take no responsibility for that data, as to whether it is true and does not contravene ICO REGS ,FCA REGS

 

 

as an example

I have a long running battle with Equifax, to remove incorrect data,

 

 

I have approached the bank/and Equifax 3 times,

the bank say NO,

Equifax state the bank refuse to remove the data and they are only acting on instructions,

 

 

the default was issued Feb 2009,

so according to ICO should not show on any CRA file,

and Equifax are not interested at all that I can prove the default date in writing.

 

 

Because I don't pay them anything I assume

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got all of this in writing?

 

Have you got all of the evidence needed to sue them in court for defamation?

 

The real reason why the CRAs take no interest in you as an individual, is simply because they get paid by the DCA's for marking your files.

 

As soon as you make it known, in writing, that the information on your credit file is inaccurate and they need to remove/process accurately, or you WILL seek legal remedy, then they begin to sit up and take notice.

 

IMO, I'd write to them once more, advise them to remove the inaccurate data within seven working days, OR you WILL start legal proceedings against them, the data controller, for defamation.

 

You also need to make a complaint to the ICO regarding them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bazooka,thanks for your reply ,

 

 

I have all the relevant documentation ,

although I didn't put this in the post above,

 

 

also in writing from the bank in response to my SAR May 2009

I have the letter that states they are unable to find any documentation regarding this loan account,

so the account is also Statute Barred as well,

 

 

I have advised Equifax and the Bank of these facts,

and each time I write to them I make it very clear that my letter does not acknowledge the existence of the account, so naturally I haven't paid a single penny for nearly 8 years.

 

Have made an online complaint to ICO, and as you suggest I will send one final letter stating removal within 7 days or I will seek a Legal Remedy

 

Again thanks for your help

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

you write to the original creditor

you enclose proof of the defaulted date

you give them 14 days to remove the wrongful data on aLL CRF providers files

or you will raise a complaint with the ICO

and seek financial Compensation.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 threads merged,

same advise given weeks ago.

 

 

so have you done so?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have already stated the ICO have been involved and there is a FINAL letter going of to the bank concerned,HOWEVER my question concerns the lack of responsibility taken by the CRAs,they are getting away without being RESPONSIBLE for any of the data they publish and that is not right in my opinion

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really as its the banks that inform them

You route is as post 13

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are or were paying the debt off so you have acknowledged the debt and that means the debt doesnt become SB until 6 years after your last payment or acknowledgement of the debt was made.

 

Regarding your last point,

if the information is incorrect you may sue the people who place that information on your credit file for the resultant damages and the CRA will correct the file to show a true record with regard to the information given to them by the originator.

 

If they refuse to correct it them you can chase them for contempt of court ut ultimately it is still the bank or whoever is providing that information who is responsible.

 

As your files are not srictly in the public domain the laws of libel and their burden of proof that is the reverse of most law doesnt apply and you have to prove that damage has been done to your reputation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact that a debt might be sb'd has little or no relationship to if/if not the account shows on your credit file.

 

 

that is dictated by a default notice issuance.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree, however the account is well over 6 years old and should not be on any credit file,hence the ICO complaint,and final letter to bank

 

What is the date next to the default on your credit file?

 

The default will not drop off your credit file UNTIL the sixth year anniversary of it being placed on there.

 

Makes no difference the age of the account.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know bb but fs appears not be be understanding things......?

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So the default reached its 6th birthday then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great i'll mark the thread resolved.

 

 

glad we helped

 

 

The Consumer Action Group needs help to cover its expenses.

You could help by making a money contribution to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

or by downloading our toolbar and using it to search the web instead of your normal search engine:- http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/cag_plugin.php

Please help.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the bank please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...