Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter from Barclaycard advising that my claim for PPI was upheld and they offered me £1257.

 

After querying the interest amount and advising the FOS they then offered another £865.

They wrote to me saying they had sent payment to Barclaycard as their records show I was in an IVA which they were advised had finished in July 2015.

 

Grant Thornton ( now Aperture) have said that a variation in my IVA means they can collect the PPI money.

 

I know there is a court case relating to this to be heard on appeal this week but any advice would help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the forthcoming appeal case this week will decide re yr issue, then maybe wait for that :)

maybe it wont be retrospective though if it is decided that they can collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply Ford The BCard account wasn't part of the IVA so does this matter?

not sure. maybe, as iva's may need to know about any change of credit circs. but, yours has finished. what do the terms of your iva say about it.

will that case address that issue.

has the fos said anything about it.

there is also that issue about offsetting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS say they don't get involved with IVAs

although they said unofficially to wait until the appeal is done.

 

 

Aperture keep saying that the IVA states they can still collect PPI payments

but I cannot find where it says that they can do this once it has been done.

 

 

if its a matter of it being classed as a financial windfall then what's stopping them collect any other non PPI windfall

. see reply from Aperture

 

 

Unfortunately your understanding is not correct,

your case went through a Mass Variation Meeting (MVM) on 14th August, 2013.

The purpose of the MVM was to allow us to gain consent from your creditors to allow us to close your case while the PPI continues in the background, therefore the closure of your case does not supersede the MVM.

 

 

For your convenience I have attached a copy of your Closure Report which you will see specifically states that your supervisor will continue with the PPI investigations post closure. ( IT DOES NOT MENTION PPI)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its an asset that existed from before your IVA

so sadly you'll lose it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...