Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excel counselling for West Brom Build Soc chasing mortgage shortfall CCJ from 2006


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Newby to this site,

 

approximately 1994 i handed the keys to my house to the lender,

i was stupid to do so, i know that now but "old head, young shoulders" an'all that!

 

i bought the house for £32,000 only lived there for about 3-4 years before life hit the skids.

i moved around for a few years & ended up in wales,

 

after a while i got a letter demanding approximately £14,000

i just screwed it up & filed it!

they'd sold my house for £18,000 expected me to pay the difference for the full original amount borrowed!

 

They repeatedly sent letters requesting that i go to the courthouse,

i was scared to death!

i ignored them, i was moving soon anyway!!!

 

a year or so later similar letter drops on the mat @ new place,

all in all i dodged it for years,

 

then i got a letter telling me a warrant was out for my arrest.

Time to put my hands up i thought!,

 

i rang them & was told that if i went to local courthouse i could cancel warrant.

i went and was asked a lot of questions concerning my bank accounts & had to show details of any bank accounts (cards etc) & sign some papers (no idea what)

the guy questioning me said that i could more or less just forget about it from that point onwards.

that was about 2006.

 

now im getting the same letters again,

a guy saying that he's trying to contact me concerning account #********* etc,

he comes from a company called Excel counselling according to his paperwork.

 

now, i have very little in the way of assets, i rent my home, i have a car & a motorbike

 

but, & its a biggun, i am the director of my own LTD company now, are the assets of the company in any danger from this process?

 

my company pays me the minimum wage to keep tax low etc.

so i can prove that my personal income is quite low, but can they seize money or assets from the LTD Co?

thanks!

Edited by yorick
remembered some detail
Link to post
Share on other sites

With letters from the court & a warrant for arrest : it sounds like the lender got a CCJ.

If they hadn't : you'd have been in the clear due to the time elapsed, as mortgage shortfalls aren't enforced after 12 years, absent a CCJ.

 

A CCJ doesn't expire. It needs the permission of the court to enforce after 6 years, though.

If you've been dodging court letters : permission for the lender to enforce a CCJ, even after 10 years (from 2006), seems likely.

 

They can't go after company assets DIRECTLY.

They can affect the company though:

a) who owns the company's shares? They can go after those as an asset of yours (if need be by bankruptcy proceedings against you)

b) bankruptcy proceedings could be a powerful lever against you : you can't be a director of a company as a bankrupt, (and trying to get round that by nominating someone else as the director but controlling it through them isn't permitted, so called "shadow directorship").

 

 

" & sign some papers (no idea what)" ; as a general rule, if you don't know what you are signing, don't sign it until you understand what you are signing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Bazza s,

Im the sole owner & director of the LTD company, sounds like i may be fairly stuffed then!

it seems odd that the can check out my assets approx 10 years after the first payment default & as i had nothing worth grabbing leave me for another 10 years & take another look!!

also, the company only has equipment as assets, not money at present!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not jump to any conclusions about your situation. First thing you need to get hold of, is a copy of the CCJ that was obtained, as well as details of any other court applications. Once you have that information, then come back for more advice or see a Solicitor.

 

If you have never been personally served any court document asking you to attend court about this, then i would question what you have been told. As far as i know, if they are looking at contempt of court or requesting you attend court for questioning, they have to personal serve court notice on you, by a court authorised process server. They can't just post it to an address.

 

Excel are acting for whoever owns this debt and they charge fees, which are added to the debt. Does not mean this debt is currently legally enforceable and if you ask your local county court for copies of all paperwork, then you can start to understand the exact current position. There is a process for getting copies of all documents from a court and a small fee fto cover photocopying.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excel counselling are a dca

Not bailiff s. Ignore them!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really no such time limit

Think things have well passed now

No warrant can be active either

 

And I bet they say our client on their letter too

 

And I bet the letterhead doesn't say bailiff s

 

Trying to spoof you there's some legal recourse here

I bet not

 

Can you scan the letter go PDF please

 

Bet it doesn't say will anything either phishing/fleecing attempts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that right dx100uk? Does ignoring them eventually work? I think there's about three & half years till 12 year time limit!

 

There are thousands of mortgage debts being chased dating back to the 1990's and add on top those which are more recent.

 

 

In 2000 i believe the Council for Morgage Lenders made it a rule that if a repossession shortfall was not chased for 6 years, then it should be written off.

 

We don't know the exact history of this debt and was has happened over the years, hence why you need to get hold of the documents from the Court.

 

 

You would think that if they really wanted to enforce a CCJ, they would have a process server on your doorstep with an official document with a court date to attend.

 

 

The fact that they have given it to Excel to do general debt collection work on this, suggests that there is no imminent threat of anything major happening.

 

 

Perhaps more than 6 years has passed since this CCJ and they have not been able to extend any enforcement period.

They are just trying to see if they can get any money from you.

See what you can find out about the CCJ and any subsequent applications, so you know the truth about the situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems that the OC wrote and got judgement on the shottfall within 6yrs

they got various warrants bt they would have ALL expired.

 

 

can we see the letter please and the name of excels client.

I would suspect it is NOT the claimant anyway

so not a chance in hell of ever enforcing anything.

 

 

we need to see the letter please in PDF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100, I'm having difficulty responding on my phone. The letter is not really up to much, I can't scan it till later, I seem to struggle to find my way. Back to this thread every time there's a reply, I'm sure it's cos I'm new to it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

hi again,

sorry i disappeared,

i couldnt figure out how to convert the letter to the required format to send & then every thing seemed to have smoothed over & i heard nothing from excel again,

 

yesterday i got this letter through the door, any idea what it means?

 

i'm not sure if ive attached it correctly as i dont really now what im doing where PDF and suchlike is concerned, i downloaded something called Libre office that allows converting to different formats stc,

I know i probably come over as a technical dumbo, i mostly am! lol. my forte is hands on practical stuff.

county court notice.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are trying the court route again but have been knocked back because they have failed to contact you first.

 

 

It is clear from the short summary of why that they have lied to the court about being unable to contact you.

 

Essentially you dont have to do anything about this as I'm sure they will be back in touch again.

 

 

You could ask the court for a copy of their application,

you may get charged for the photocopy but at least you will know what they were trying

 

Excel wont have much in the way fo rights in this matter

but if you dont defend when they take it to court you will always lose by default.

 

 

You must start taking control of your life.

Once they know that you are going to stand and fight they will most likely just run away as they have no legal rights to do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone been trying to contact you at the address the court have written to ?

 

Seems Excel or whoever represents them has told the court that they have attempted to contact you at the address and failed.

 

If they want to proceed you might have a process server turn up at your door in an attempt to deliver a letter by hand.

 

 

The process server will report that they tried and failed if you don't take the letter, so it makes no odds whether you try to hide or not.

 

 

You might as well take the letter if such a visit happens and try to deal with it.

 

 

As ericsbrother says, you might lose by default if you decide to try to avoid court actions against you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The process server is an independent listed official instructed by whoever owns or has contract to collect this debt, to basically serve documents on the debtor and to issue paperwork confirming service that would be accepted by the court.

 

The letter in October is just a field agent from Excel, not a process server that would be accepted by the court.

 

This just makes it look like Excel really don't know what they are doing. They have tried their luck in applying for alternative service and the Judge has not accepted. Why are they not willing to pay a process server.

 

Do you currently own any property assets or have savings, which would be at risk, if the claimant holding the CCJ looked to take further action ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply trying to spoof you.

 

 

I take it that letter came from a court address?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's good then

 

 

the court are aware of their antics and are doing their job.

 

 

who's the claimant on the letter?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No harm in posting here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...