Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SCS sofa ordered july, wont be here till november - help!


StephensonL
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I'm new to this site but In DESPERATE need of advice!

 

 

On the 16th of July 2016 I signed a contract with SCS on a sofa order;

may I add that it is my first sofa so in the meantime I have absolutely nothing to sit on and my 3 year old son simply now has a been bag which cost me £50.

 

The sale was by the Sales Manager of a branch in Scotland,

she had full knowledge that I am a working single parent

(this changed her attitude when doing a credit check and confirmed I could get a sofa up to the value of £6000 when dealing with me),

 

 

The sales manager was also made aware that as this was my first property myself and my son have nothing to sit on in the mean time and also that my son is only 3 years old- 4 in a couple of weeks.

 

When conducting the sale I was ensured that I would only have to wait the 12 weeks time scale at the very latest and was never once informed of the small print which states there is a 4 week leeway period.

 

 

After chasing my order up numerous times I have now been informed that my Sofa will 100% not be in the distribution centre until the 8th/11th of November which is past my 12 weeks time scale and also the additional 4 week leeway period.

 

Can anyone advice me on what do now here as I am stumped!

 

I have incurred a terribley sore back now but am broken hearted seeing my son being fed up sitting on the floor asking why we don't have a couch like others, he doesn't even want to stay in our new house because he's fed up on the floor in his own words.

 

Should I take out a credit card and buy one elsewhere with immediate delivery and cancel the order as soon as the 4 weeks leeway period has also passed or what?

 

Any help would be appreciated so much ... thanks in avnace for any help !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you buy this sofa online or over the telephone or did you go to the shop?

 

Regardless of the answer to this, if they have exceeded their delivery period and also their leeway. Then it seems to me that you are entitled to cancel the order immediately. Have they taken any money from you?

 

You must do everything in writing. If you want to cancel the order then write them a letter straightaway and make sure you send it by special delivery – not recorded – so that it arrives tomorrow. Keep a copy. Keep a copy of all post office receipts et cetera. Make it clear that as they have exceeded all the time limits specified in their contract you are now terminating the contract. You want a full refund of any money that you have paid within seven days.

 

Let us know what happens.

 

Of course, this is your own private business so please excuse me for suggesting this – but have you not thought about getting a second-hand sofa from eBay for instance? There are some fantastic things to be had and you can probably spend the same kind of money that you have committed to this new sofa to getting a much more upmarket and better quality item.

 

I have to say that I'm a bit of an eBay fanatic and I buy everything from eBay including furniture and a lot of clothing. Which sofa did you buy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

Should I take out a credit card and buy one elsewhere

 

No.

As suggested in the other post, you should look on eBay for any used sofas in your area.

 

 

House clearance auctions are also worth investigating.

The difference is that you can get something to sit on for a fiver rather than for a fiver per week.

 

 

If you look for credit to buy things you are always going to be under the thumb of the credit providers and people like SCS.

 

 

You can consider giving SCS a few weeks to either come up with the goods or you will cancel, but how you act will depend on if you paid a deposit, how you paid it and how much it was.

 

There's a 2-seat sofa here that I got for a couple of pounds from a house clearance auction.

There's nothing wrong with it but I'll be rearranging things soon and, if I don't find someone who wants it, I might auction it on eBay with a 1p start. It's likely that I am not in your area but the chances are that there is someone in a similar situation near you.

 

To find the dates and places for house clearance auctions,

look in your local newspaper or phone round the people listed under "auctioneer" in the yellow pages.

 

 

Yes, you can get a decent sofa for £5.

For £10 you can get one in a colour that you like.

For £20 you can have a leather one.

 

 

If you don't have a car to strap it to,

you might pay the same again for delivery but my view is that it's far better to have something which isn't going to make you want to scream when your son scribbles on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...