Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer deducted unfairly for van damage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear forum memebers thank you for stopping by to check out this thread .

 

I left a company that i was working for sometime in June. I worked there as an engineer and had a van for works use.

 

On my last day i handed my van back in same condition as received. We inspected the van and manager was even surprised that i washed it inside out and it was all good.

 

We had a informal meeting with the company owners , they wished me all the best and that was that.

 

3 months later i received my final pay payslip and discovered that they made a deduction of £350 from my final pay .

I emailed the company director and he said it was for van a damage.

 

I replied via email that i was not aware of any damages to the van and it was illegal for them to deduct that money, to which he replied that van was damaged and its a fact :| , stating that apparently i claimed more hours vs the tracker and also

that i left to there competitor even though my contract prevents me from doing so. This was the case! they tried to legally stop me , but could not which at the time they where really bitter about.

2 completely irrelevant arguments to my query imho. But he did point out that contract does allow for deductions in case of damages to works vehicle. However as mentioned the van was not damaged as they claim!

 

At the time of accepting the van i did not sign any paperwork which stated the condition of the van as it was second hand and when i handed the van back they didn't inform me in any formal way of there intention of deducting £350 from my wages, nor did i sign anything stating in which condition i handed the van back to them.

 

I phoned Acas for advice and they said to take them to small claims court as tribunal claim window is 2 months.

 

So question is what do you think Gentlemen and Ladies should i pursue this further ?

 

Thank for any input in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I am in no way an employment expert but my common sense says they shouldn't be doing this.

 

I would write a letter stating that you want this money and if they refuse, you may take other action to recover this along with any costs.

If they still refuse then a Letter Before Action is required. Don't do this if you are not prepared to follow through. If they still dispute, sue them.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only deduct money for damage if it is an implied term in your contract of employment as an accepted deduction.

 

This is unlawful deduction of wages, section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996

 

A tribunal claim is three months from cause of Action, that is when you became aware of the unlawful deduction

 

Why are you getting your final wage slip three months after you have already left??

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need sight of your contract in the first instance - wages can only be deducted with your signed agreement. No agreement then it is indeed actionable through the small claims court as a breach of contract. You would need to write in the first instance to request that the outstanding wages are paid or that you will be forced to make a claim in the County Court.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I am in no way an employment expert but my common sense says they shouldn't be doing this.

 

I would write a letter stating that you want this money and if they refuse, you may take other action to recover this along with any costs.

If they still refuse then a Letter Before Action is required. Don't do this if you are not prepared to follow through. If they still dispute, sue them.

 

 

I already email him asking for the money back and stating that i think it is unlawful for them to deduct that money, he made his position clear by threatening me! saying along the lines of don't test my good will.

 

They can only deduct money for damage if it is an implied term in your contract of employment as an accepted deduction.

 

This is unlawful deduction of wages, section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996

 

A tribunal claim is three months from cause of Action, that is when you became aware of the unlawful deduction

 

Why are you getting your final wage slip three months after you have already left??

Here is a section on deductions taken from employment contract

The Company may deduct from your pay any sums that you may owe the Company, including, without limitation, any over payment or loans made to you by the Company. The Company reserves the right to withhold any final payments to an employee upon termination of employment until all Company equipment has been returned following the termination of their employment. Any Accident in a Company Vehicle where you are at fault will result in half the insurance excess being repaid over 4 to 6 months.

 

Reason was i left the company and i started my new job money came in to my account but no wage slip was posted out to me. I was used to low money that they normally paid so did not think much off it. However when i got the payslip 3 months late i remembered that i was on call and had a very busy week hence more overtime and more money paid. To answer your question i do not know why they sent it late , all i had is we just found this in your pigeon hole with complements. hth

 

You need sight of your contract in the first instance - wages can only be deducted with your signed agreement. No agreement then it is indeed actionable through the small claims court as a breach of contract. You would need to write in the first instance to request that the outstanding wages are paid or that you will be forced to make a claim in the County Court.

 

I have wrote to them clearly stating that i do not agree with the deduction and i think it is unlawful, he turned around saying that its a fact that i damaged and that apparently i was notified at the time?? Which i was not

Edited by most
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have wrote to them clearly stating that i do not agree with the deduction and i think it is unlawful, he turned around saying that its a fact that i damaged and that apparently i was notified at the time?? Which i was not

 

It matters not what you were told - or indeed whether there was any damage - what counts is whether the employer has your SIGNED agreement that you agree to the employer withholding wages in the event of damage to a vehicle

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It matters not what you were told - or indeed whether there was any damage - what counts is whether the employer has your SIGNED agreement that you agree to the employer withholding wages in the event of damage to a vehicle

 

I did not sign anything nor was i infromed about it.

 

I just went ahead and looked at this website .nidirect. gov . uk/articles/ pay-deductions and here is interesting bit of information

 

Rules for making deductions from your pay

 

Your employer is not allowed to make a deduction from your pay or wages unless:

 

it is required or allowed by law, for example National Insurance, income tax or student loan repayments

you agree in writing to a deduction

your contract of employment says they can

it is a result of any statutory disciplinary proceedings

there is a statutory payment due to a public authority

you have not worked due to taking part in a strike or industrial action

it is to recover an earlier overpayment of wages or expenses

it is a result of a court order

 

Do you think that the section on deductions that i posted taken from my contract covers van damage as well?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi most,

 

Just so you are aware, the link you looked at relates to Northern Ireland, though in truth I wouldn't have thought there were any different scenarios where a deduction would be OK from the rest of the UK.

 

Has your former employer explained how they came to their figure of £350? Have they even explained how the vehicle was damaged?

 

I'm not that good on employment legislation, but it is certainly bad form to not inform you of the deduction without your prior agreement.

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is now clear to me that an employer on genuine grounds can deduct money from wages as long as contract of employment states that they can do so. Mine does not cover van specifically however it does cover company property which a van may be described as. However we are still left with 2 details where they messed up.

1) they did not inform of the deduction

2) They have no paperwork to back there claim of supposed van damage as prior to receiving and handing van back there was no condition report made hence no real evidence of damage that i supposedly did.

Common sense is telling me to take them to small claims court.

 

Some body mentioned that Employment tribunal case can be made 3 month after the date of wrong doing. Is this the case for sure?

 

 

1)An employer shall not make a deduction from wages of a worker employed by him unless—

 

(a)the deduction is required or authorised to be made by virtue of a statutory provision or a relevant provision of the worker’s contract, or

 

(b)the worker has previously signified in writing his agreement or consent to the making of the deduction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi most,

 

Just so you are aware, the link you looked at relates to Northern Ireland, though in truth I wouldn't have thought there were any different scenarios where a deduction would be OK from the rest of the UK.

 

Has your former employer explained how they came to their figure of £350? Have they even explained how the vehicle was damaged?

 

I'm not that good on employment legislation, but it is certainly bad form to not inform you of the deduction without your prior agreement.

 

 

My best guess would be insurance excess only they failed on this count 2 has i am still in contact with engineers and van was not handed to insurance company obviously as there was nothing to repair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess would be insurance excess only they failed on this count 2 has i am still in contact with engineers and van was not handed to insurance company obviously as there was nothing to repair.

 

Sounds fishy if they've left you to guess as to why the figure it what it is and have not been prepared to explain the costs.

 

One thing I've picked up from the wording of your contract in post #5 - "Any Accident in a Company Vehicle where you are at fault will result in half the insurance excess being repaid over 4 to 6 months." So if it is insurance excess related, then I presume you have not been given the opportunity to repay this over the specified 4-6 months?

 

This could be another avenue to explore as even if your former employer points to a signed contract of employment as your consent to having your wages deducted, then you may be able to claim breach of contract as well (I stress 'may be', that will really depend on how they came to the figure they deducted).

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reading of the policy on accidents is that it refers to accidents that have been sent to the insurers. this means that to get money from you they must have made a claim.

You dont want to go to an ET, this is easily dealt with via the small claims procedure. As your boss inspected the vehicle with you he accepted that there was nothing wrong with it that could lead to an insurance claim so the company action since is an unlawful deduction of wages. If you do decide to sue for the money (I would- the N1 landing on their doorstep will amke them think very ahrd about whetehr they want to continue this charade) then you can ask for a copy of the insurance claim. They wont get naywhere without one and if it is dated more than a day after your leaving they will be stuck unless they can prove no-one else had driven it after you left up until the insurers were informd and the vehicle assessed for damage. In short, they are just being dishonest and hope you just go away

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reading of the policy on accidents is that it refers to accidents that have been sent to the insurers. this means that to get money from you they must have made a claim.

You dont want to go to an ET, this is easily dealt with via the small claims procedure. As your boss inspected the vehicle with you he accepted that there was nothing wrong with it that could lead to an insurance claim so the company action since is an unlawful deduction of wages. If you do decide to sue for the money (I would- the N1 landing on their doorstep will amke them think very ahrd about whetehr they want to continue this charade) then you can ask for a copy of the insurance claim. They wont get naywhere without one and if it is dated more than a day after your leaving they will be stuck unless they can prove no-one else had driven it after you left up until the insurers were informd and the vehicle assessed for damage. In short, they are just being dishonest and hope you just go away

 

Hi many thanks for your response. Sorry for dumb question, but what is N1? Do you think it is worth emailing them and asking for brake down on what the £350 was spent on?

I know for a fact that they have not made a claim because i seen the lad that drives the van now and its been passed on from 1 engineer to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...