Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MMF chasing 2012 the Lone Store PDL - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2808 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I hope you get this sorted lolavix.

 

I have been receiving similar threats to yourselves, only just recently they have come back being quite aggressive with their collection plan. Two emails and two letters a week for the past month.

 

Motormile claim they are collecting on a loan they purchased from The Loan Store in 2012

- can they default on this if they are not the original lender?

 

Should I be worried regarding this,

I was stupid in the past but have had a clean credit history for the past 5 years and don't want this coming back to haunt me.

 

It is only around a £300 debt but I don't want to pay them off due to the principle really.

 

As an aside (new here not sure where to post?)

 

I have recently had BPO Collections and now United Kash sending me the below

- the original lender was Payday UK/Tooth Fairy/NDR/MArshall Hoares

- the loan was for a few hundred pounds and now sits at a lovely £4500+.

"

This letter has been sent to you in respect to an outstanding amount due, originally issued by MCO Capital Limited (Trading as PayCheckCredit).

 

We assume that this matter is an oversight on your behalf and request that you call United Kash and pay the amount due £4,000

 

If you wish to get into contact to discuss your loan, please call United Kash Limited on 01473372210 or email customerservice@unitedkash

 

If you are experiencing financial difficulties we urge you to contact us so that we can gain an understanding of your current situation and consider the most appropriate action to take. We have suspended further action until next week and look forward to receiving your payment in full or a re-payment proposal from you by 17/08/16.

 

Yours faithfully

 

-------------------------------

 

Christopher Prime

 

United Kash Limited

 

United Kash Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in relation to Consumer Credit Activities and Debt Collection. It is registered on the Financial Services Register under Interim Permission number 672388. It is registered in England and Wales with Company Registration Number 06890816. Its Office: Office 21, Epsilon Business Centre, West Road, Ransomes Euro Park, Ipswich Suffolk IP3 9FL. "

 

Should I be worried about this or not?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not normally say this Ginola

but with motormouth i would simply ignore them.

 

 

If you phone them then you are on the hook.

Only the original creditor can default you but watch your step.

 

 

I had an old payday loan this lot were chasing.

They defaulted the day they were assigned the debt, not the creditor.

 

 

They also recorded it as a student loan rather than a payday loan.

This is how unprofessional bottom feeder they really are

 

You do not want to be phoning them and acknowledge the loan as it will be almost statute barred

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

ive created your own thread for you.

 

ignore both of them

 

I assume that the old loans have defaulted and gone from your file already?

 

MMF are toothless threat mongers only

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for moving this and your response,

 

I don't believe either of them have ever actually defaulted which is where my query lies with MMF.

 

Are they likely to try and default it in 2016 leaving me without a hope of a mortgage for another 6 years?

 

The other one has been sold and fees added countless times in the past 5 years

so I am not worried as I know there's not a hope in hell that'll stand up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so there is no default from the OC to date?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant send or register a default notice no

but they might well try and enter D's in the monthly summary.

 

but they can easily be dealt with if they do.

 

strange to OC never defaulted you?

before they sold the debt on ?

 

or did they go bust like so many PDL co's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked current and historic credit reports on there nothing at all. Odd.

 

OC never defaulted, not sure if the loans dodgy fees and aggressive collection strategy might be a factor in this?

 

Think I'm going to ignore it all and then raise it with the relevant authorities if they go down the default or credit report route?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

Sorry to bring up an older thread - looking at moneyadviceservice and other similar forums to this I've seen a few examples of MMF defaulting people years and years after they purchased the debt.

 

This debt was sold to MMR from The Loan Store in 2012.

 

 

I'm just wondering if I should pay them off (it pains me to do so).

 

 

The money isn't really an issue it's just that they've hounded me for years

and I don't want them defaulting me just as I'm buliding up a good credit history and am completely debt free?

 

Any advice would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant and if they do

you complain to the ICO

 

 

they have already been fined for doing this by the FCA anyway

 

 

stop panicking ..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...