Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance PPI Claim


corsaguy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2817 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

Looking for some help.

 

My partner made an application via a PPI company to claim back any PPI he had on his old accounts,

 

They found we had 1 from Welcome Finance on a car we had in 2004.

 

they sent away to claim it back,

Welcome instantly declined it and the management company dealing with the claim for him decided to send it to the FOS.

 

2 Months ago the FOS found against Welcome and advised them to reimburse in a proper manner.

But now this is where we need help.

 

Welcome has sent us a letter which I will attach for you to see.

 

 

they have stated that they are going into liquidation in the next year

so have been advised not to make any payments to people??

 

Can they do this?

Or is this another way they are trying in order to get out of paying people there money.

 

I have attached parts of both the letters they have sent.

 

 

Any advice would be great :)

welcome.png

welcome2.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this quite amazing as the FSCS has been administering welcome claims for a good few years.

 

pers i'd close the claim with the fleecing PPI company

as you'll lose +35% and 20% tax on whatever you do get...

 

let them go bust then goto the FSCS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your quick reply.

 

I never knew my partner had used the company to do the claim :( :(

 

Only issue we have with going to the FSCS is we have been advised they will not deal with it

as the account was opened in 2004 and they only deal with claims after 2005.

 

Nightmare, Cant believe the reply they have sent,

Even thought the FOS have found in our favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss not, the FOS have ruled in your favour

AFAIK that trumps the FSCS 2004 wriggle.

 

 

so this was a joint loan?

you both signed it?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would await welcome to assign administrators

though I'm sure they pulled the same stunt years ago

re Cattles..the parent company

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok . I am awaiting for the FOS to get back in contact with us.

 

Welcome have advised that when they appoint administrators that they will probably offer 1 pence for every pound they owe us.

 

disgrace of a company. Happy to see them go that way they cant continue what to have done in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you miss the point

once in administration

FSCS rules dictate you get 90% of your claim

 

have you got all the statement

and have done a spreadsheet

and filled out the FOS customer questionnaire?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok , Sorry got you now.

 

We dont have a statment as used the ppi company. but filled in all the docs as requested by the fos, They advised welcome 2 months ago to pay up. fos sent us a form asking for us to sign it to say we accepted there decision. Which was to uphold the complaint :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar to welcome

get all the data they hold

before it hits the shredder

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Im in dire need of some help with calculations.

 

I have had a successful claim against Welcome and today I received my cheque from them but to be honest I think it is short.

 

I have a statement of figure which they have included.

I hope it is k to post them and for someone to help me work them out as I feel that WFS are trying to pay less than they should.

 

Amount of PPI added to loan £696.68

Less rebate of PPI £373.22

Amount of interest added due to PPI Premium £1035.36

Less Rebate of PPI Interest £354.18

Amount of compensation due before calculating 8% interest £1004.64

 

Amount of payments received towards the PPI Premium

and interest since the start date £869.06

8%(simple) interest on the payments made towards PPI (£) £460.31

Withholding TAX £92.06

Total compensation due after calculating 8% interest &

withholding income tax at 20% £1372.89

 

Value of cash to be repaid £1237.30

Value of adjustment to this account £135.58

Total amount of compensation now due £1372.89

 

Now I have received a cheque for £1237.30 which I honestly dont think is very correct.

 

I settled this loan late 2005 in full.

So I maybe wrong but I was going by the amount I paid £869.06

and then calculate the 8% interest from then until todays date.

 

 

Which is I am correct should work out as £869.06 x 0.08 (interest) x 10 (years) = £695.24

then + 869.06 = £1564.30.

I dont know if I am wrong but I dont think I am.

 

Could someone please help with this, Thank you

:) :) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new thread merged for history

please keep to one thread.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...