Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

More Welcome Finance issues


Bandit_28
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's another Welcome Finance issue.

 

We took out a loan in July 2007 for £14k, payable for 168 months (14 yrs) so ending in 2021.

 

The monthly payments were £273 now risen to £320,

by my calulations that's £45484 minimum to pay back.

 

Since then I've had late payment fees and interests added on at crazy amounts where i was last quoted by one of their agents that there is still £19000 to pay the debt off.

 

I have a PPI claim with them going through the FSCS and its come up that the Welcome loan was refinanced by Bright Finance in 2007,

 

i know nothing about this and have no record of this happening.

I'm still in contact with Welcome and not Bright so how can this be redeemed??

 

I'm very tempted to stop payments but i belive the loan may be secured on the house.

 

can you suggest my next moves please as i see Welcome finance are causing a lot of stess and grief to others

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

BRIGHT FINANCE LIMITED

(Company Number 04203011)

 

 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 98 of the Insolvency Act 1986, that a Meeting of Creditors of the above named company will be held at 93 Queen Street, Sheffield S1 1WF on 10 November 2009 at 10.30 am for the purposes mentioned in Sections 99, 100 and 101 of the said Act.

A list of names and addresses of the Company’s Creditors will be available for inspection between the hours of 10.00am and 4.00pm at The P&A Partnership, 93 Queen Street, Sheffield, S1 1WF on the two business days before the date of the Meeting.

 

Dated 26 October 2009

 

By Order of the Board

 

John Battersby Director

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sar time too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

RE WELCOME FINANCE ISSUES,

 

I seem to be better off than most re Welcome loans.

 

Successfully reclaimed a chunk of PPI 2 years ago using a Debt management company who have since stopped doing debt management.

 

Cutting long story short

 

 

about 5 months ago I received a letter telling me that that anything I owed to Welcome (according to last figures I had they claimed around £1400) was being written off and infact I was due £848 with interest due to over charging,

 

however this was being dealt with by some administration company.

 

3 weeks ago received a form on Welcome stationary for me to sign and return accepting the rebate.

 

Not received said rebate as yet, however fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've just received £625 from the FCSC for PPI,

how ever still paying huge amounts of interest on the original loan which I feel are a con.

 

 

I refused to pay one months money while this was being looked into

and have found out that £180 interest has been added to the loan.

 

 

Surely this is not allowed.

 

 

Who could I contact to seek legal advice on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you SAR and CCA?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...