Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Specsavers dispute **Resolved**


Homer67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an eye test at Specsavers and selected some frames and paid for them to be glazed in the script they supplied with thinning and a scratchcoat. I paid via Barclaycard Visa.

 

I went to collect them and have them fitted today and as soon as I put them on I realised something was wrong.

 

I advised the optician they were not right and she refused to believe me saying my eyes needed to adapt to them as I had been wearing my current glasses for some time.

 

I disagreed stating that I owned 3 pairs of spectacles with 2 different scripts and contact lenses with a third script and I had no problem swapping around glasses or contacts previously.

 

I advised that the new glasses made me want to squint my left eye so that could not be right, the optician refused to accept they were wrong and insisted that I try them and come back in a few weeks.

 

Initially I refused and I stated that I was an experienced glasses wearer and there was definitely something wrong.

 

I asked what could be done and the optician said nothing as I hadn't persevered with them. I said I was not prepared to as they were making me feel dizzy and I wasn't going to risk my health to prove her wrong.

 

I was getting nowhere so I said I would get another eye test to see if they had the script wrong and would return as soon as I had that.

 

I left the shop with the glasses and tried them a few more times to make sure and I am convinced they are wrong.

 

I contacted Barclaycard and raised a dispute and they have suspended payment (I presume the shop has received funds as payment on the card was 16/07) so the suspension is for my payment to Barclaycard.

 

So I am going to get another eye test done and see if it matches.

 

If it doesn't I presume I should be able to claim a full refund and possibly the cost of the second eye test?

 

Any advice on how I should approach this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now resolved

 

That's good to hear. I also have had the experience of glasses not quite being right - don't uncomfortable to see through, but not providing as much correction as I've been used to. The optician said this was just me getting older, but I'm not so convinced.

 

What was causing the issue in your case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now resolved

 

That is good to hear, I take it to your satisfaction.

 

Thread title amended.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what caused the initial issue. the spectacles made me feel dizzy with a binocular effect on the left eye. I wore them over the weekend and it just stopped. So they are ok, I'm now wearing them every day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I had a very similar experience with Specsavers and will never use them again. Ended up using a private local optician who spent the time necessary with my eye test and I ended up with a totally different prescription to the twice tested Specsavers prescription.

 

.....Never again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar experience few years back, i had used Specsavers for few years at the time with no probs,

Then on an eye test few years ago i was told I required a new prescription, at time my prescription was only for distance albeit i needed wear glasses all the time.

When picked up the new glasses and tried them on .. I said no way, you have given me someone elses prescription surely? the floor was coming up at me, the lighting colour in the shop looked wrong was weird experience, I said you have got something seriously wrong here, i can't be wearing these especially to drive home with.

No i was told justa matter of readjustment few days required.. no way i said .. never going to happen, give it 24 hours your see your adjust and in couple days your fully adjust.

I left shop wearing glasses .. got to my car no way could risk driving, thought ok get home and try them few hours, well did that few hours in started feeling very light headed, sickly with them.. no way could continue.

Went back to Specsavers next day and complained, ok we will retest they said .. on retest they said ohhh sorry the astigmatism part of your prescription was higher than should of been in new glasses, i had to wait another couple days for another pair to be made.

When got the new pair a slight bit adjustment required but nothing like the wrong astigmatism pair.

I let them off lightly thinking back on it, should really made a claim of some sort at time :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I used use Specsavers but we had to go to a different optician for a 2nd opinion and found his company so much better than Specsavers who are the production line company of opticians so we all use him now , i was never really happy with Specsavers any way

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...