Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC trying to enforce a 10yrs old CCJ for black horse loan


Markie1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

its not statute barred

theres a CCJ

but that's 6yrs + passed enforcement

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

now we have the text we can clearly see its a discount begging letter.

 

 

they know full well they cant enforce it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's safe to ignore and consign their letter to file 13 (the bin) then?

 

I have contacted the FCA via their live chat and they advised me to contact the Solicitors Regulatory Authority but they will log the details, I have e-mailed a complaint to the SRA along with a copy of the letter from Mortimer Clarke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nooo.... file away safely ..may come in handy for any future attempts

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have advised, they'd only be able to apply to a court to enforce the CCJ, now it is excess of 6 years old.

 

Charging order

A charging order could only be made against property that you had an 'interest' in, be that a "legal interest' (with your name on the title at the Land Registry), or a 'beneficial interest' (where someone else held the legal interest in trust for you).

 

If (for example) Person A (a father) had died, leaving the property in his widow's (B) name, but leaving a share to their child © and multiple other children, it is possible that C won't hold a legal interest in the property, only a beneficial one ( as only so many names will show for the legal title).

Then a charging order could be sought against the property held by B in respect of C's share of the property for a CCJ against C. If B had been willed / owned the property outright, then no charging order would be granted against B's property for C's CCJ whilst the property was wholly owned by B.

 

So, I think 'willy-waving' (as someone has described it) is an accurate description.

'Late' Enforcement of the CCJ

The CCJ is never statute barred. They'd need permission of the court to enforce it, given the time elapsed, and have to show why they couldn't enforce it before, and why it was fair, reasonable and just to allow enforcement now. The more time goes on, the higher the bar they'd have to clear.

If you won the lottery (£86 million tomorrow night!) they might have a chance .... but then again, if you won that much, would you really care? :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello Folks,

 

Well I hope you can advise me as today I received a letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors regarding a very old Black Horse loan from approx 2000 to 2001 (infact this loan was originally taken out through Chartered Trust) for the amount of £1886.59 and that this debt was previously assigned to MEIII (was actually Direct Legal and Collections), now no payment has been made on this loan for well over 10 years and has already been through various DCA's prior to DLC going through the courts (a CCJ was granted back in 2006).

 

Over 2 - 3 years ago I remember receiving a letter from DLC (I think I may of posted about this but can't remember) which had the old claim number in bold letters, I also remember ringing the County Court who informed me as the Judgement is well over 6 years old and has lapsed then the DCA could not enforce the original judgement as the court would not allow this.

 

What I would like to know is the best way to approach Mortimer Clarke regarding this debt as it is deffenately Statute Barred and has already been subject to a CCJ 13 years ago?.

 

Also there is a interesting paragraph at the top of their letter which states: ' We write regarding the above matter, Our client previously instructed us to place your account on hold due to a complaint (?). We have now received confirmation that the matter has been resolved (this totally lost me as I never made a complaint and how can a complaint be resolved as it has never been raised??).

 

At the bottom the usual twaddle asking me to contact them within 21 days and also a income and expenditure form stapled to the letter obviously thinking that I will make a payment on a debt from years ago which is Statute Barred.

 

Any help/advice will be greatly appreciated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged for the 4th time on this debt.

 

as post 7.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...