Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£29K Payday Interest Over 4.5 Years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello. This is my first post, so please go easy on me.

 

 

I went through a really bad period with payday loans a couple of years ago, which thankfully I managed to get out off.

 

 

I was only able to get out of the debt spiral thanks to a new high paying job which I started in September 2013.

 

 

Now that I have had some time to reflect I realise that the sheer volume of payday loans I was dealing with was immense.

 

 

Here are some of the details:

 

• Between 15/03/2011 and 03/09/2015 (4.5 years) I took out a total of 113 payday loans, across 11 different payday lenders.

 

• Of these loans, I rolled over on 55 occasions.

 

• In total I borrowed £56K and repaid £85K, resulting in £29K in interest.

 

• Prior to my first payday loan my credit rating was so poor that high street lenders turned me down and payday loan companies were the only ones who would lend to me.

 

• I did not default on any loans (I was desperate to not damage my credit rating further).

 

• I did not have any gambling problems.

 

• From what I can see, all of my payday loans are appearing on my Call Credit report (there is at least 100+ payday loans on my credit file).

 

• I have bank statements for the duration I had the payday loans.

 

• I often paid loans off and then instantly took out another with same company.

 

• I took out payday loans to pay off other payday loans.

 

• I also borrowed from friends, and took out guarantor loans in order to finally get my payday loan debt under control.

 

• I had multiple payday loans with the same company at the same time, but under different lending names (i.e. Payday UK and Payday Express).

 

• I had payday loans and longer term loans with the same company (i.e. Pounds to Pocket and Quick Quid)

 

• The five highest APRs I paid to payday loan companies was as follows:

1. 47,700,103%

2. 5,000,000%

3. 3,076,698%

4. 146,975%

5. 93,133%

 

I have reached out to all of the payday loan companies to obtain full details of the loans (Statement of Account).

Most have been responsive, but for the ones who have not,

I have been able to reconstruct the details from the agreements and bank statements.

 

My plan is to approach the payday lenders to ask for a repayment of interest on the basis that my behaviour with them

(i.e. rolling over and relending on the same day I paid off previous loans),

together with my credit file should have confirmed that these loans were unaffordable.

 

My concern though is whether or not I mentioned the other payday loans when I was applying,

and whether this omission could be seen as fraud.

 

 

Having looked through the various forums, I can’t see this point specifically addressed anywhere

but I am certain I won’t be the only one who has this concern.

 

 

Also, as I can’t be certain if I did or did not mention this when asked,

should I not include the fact I had other payday loans with other companies when making my complaints?

 

I am also concerned that the fact I did not default on any of the loans means I am less likely to receive a pay-out.

 

I would welcome anyone’s thoughts on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you could have numerous claims for irresponsible lending here with each PDL co.?

 

 

get writing

 

 

type in irresponsible lending in the search cag box of the red toolbar up top

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk.

 

 

I fully intend to start the claiming back and the resources on this site have been of great help.

 

 

I am still concerned that they will say that I did not give them all details of my expenses when I applied for the loans,

but i assume that as a responsible lender, they are meant to do checks (i.e. credit search, past loaning history with the company etc.) and not just take my word?

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

irresponsible lending route

not reclaiming mind

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asked for Statement of Accounts from all Payday Lenders.

 

Only Payday UK, Payday Express and Ladder Loans (all the same company) refused, stating that they were under no obligation to provide the information. Not too bothered as I had reconstructed all of it from bank statements. Wonga have yet to provide it but say that they will, it is just that they are very busy at the moment.

 

Have submitted my complaints to all of the companies, so the 8 week clock starts now. In total, the interest on the 10 pay day lenders I am claiming against is £30,271 (there are two that I will not claim against as i only had one or two loans with them). I will wait and see what response I get from Payday UK, Payday Express and Ladder Loans - if I need to go to the FOS, then I will pay the £10 for the subject access request, but maybe they will agree to settle (although that looks unlikely given what I have read on here).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update:

 

- Uncle Buck asked for my credit report and bank statements. I gave them the credit report, but not the bank statements.

 

- Quick Quid have asked for the following: income at time of loan, expenses at time of loan, if I got my letter from a website or blog, did I tell them I was experiencing financial hardship, banks statements and payslips. I have yet to provide any of this.

 

- Mr Lender have rejected my claim on the basis that affordability checks were carried out and the expenses figures I gave them at the time of the loans meant that I should have been able to afford the loans. They have however offered me £375 as a good will gesture, which is the amount I would have saved if the roll over cap had been in place earlier (the total interest I paid to Mr Lender was £3,547.07).

 

- Lending Stream have rejected my claim on the basis affordability checks were carried out and that the expenses figures I gave them at the time of the loans meant that I should have been able to afford the loans. They have however offered me £40.80 because of a ‘procedural error’ on one of the loans (the total interest I paid to Lending Stream was £3,547.76).

 

 

I am starting to get worried, because I think I significantly understated my expenses at the time of most of the payday loans (as I couldn’t get credit from any other source, as my credit history was so poor, despite what Mr Lender and Lending Stream say), a fact that will come out if I provide my bank statements.

 

Anyone care to offer any advise on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update:

 

- Uncle Buck asked for my credit report and bank statements. I gave them the credit report, but not the bank statements.

 

- Quick Quid have asked for the following: income at time of loan, expenses at time of loan, if I got my letter from a website or blog, did I tell them I was experiencing financial hardship, banks statements and payslips. I have yet to provide any of this.

 

- Mr Lender have rejected my claim on the basis that affordability checks were carried out and the expenses figures I gave them at the time of the loans meant that I should have been able to afford the loans. They have however offered me £375 as a good will gesture, which is the amount I would have saved if the roll over cap had been in place earlier (the total interest I paid to Mr Lender was £3,547.07).

 

- Lending Stream have rejected my claim on the basis affordability checks were carried out and that the expenses figures I gave them at the time of the loans meant that I should have been able to afford the loans. They have however offered me £40.80 because of a ‘procedural error’ on one of the loans (the total interest I paid to Lending Stream was £3,547.76).

 

 

I am starting to get worried, because I think I significantly understated my expenses at the time of most of the payday loans (as I couldn’t get credit from any other source, as my credit history was so poor, despite what Mr Lender and Lending Stream say), a fact that will come out if I provide my bank statements.

 

Anyone care to offer any advise on this?

 

 

So they are asking you NOW for information they should have requested at the time of Lending ! - if that doesn't prove irresponsible lending, I don't know what is.

 

 

No, you don't show them your bank statements.

 

 

When you say you "understated your expenses" , what do you mean ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BiB - Welcome to CAG

 

Could you list all PDL Comps below?

I might beable to help?

 

Hi fkofilee

 

Here they are:

 

Quick Quid – £3,430.89 interest between 14/03/11 to 01/11/13

Wonga - £7,724.74 interest between 27/04/11 to 07/07/14

Payday UK - £3,992.17 interest between 06/02/12 to 01/07/14

Lending Stream LLC - £3,547.76 interest between 11/07/12 to 10/03/14

Mr Lender - £3,547.07 interest between 04/12/12 to 01/05/15

Payday Express - £1,326.85 interest between 11/12/12 to 02/12/13

Sunny - £2,274.95 interest between 31/08/13 to 28/08/15

Uncle Buck - £1,414.58 interest between 14/10/13 to 01/09/15

My Jar - £1,453.29 interest between 23/10/13 to 02/11/15

Quid Market - £1,559.22 interest between 24/10/13 to 30/06/15

Peachy - £522.57 interest between 15/03/14 to 04/08/14

Ladder Loans - £702.84 interest between 01/12/14 to 01/06/15

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info. Have you asked for a Statement from all companies concerned?

 

A Copy of the Credit Reports shouldn't need to be provided because the info from then is significantly different to the info now and cannot be fully relied upon - unless you have a report from around that time.

 

QQ Always seem to do a template response. I dont know why they do that, especially about the website template etc.

I'm happy to help but i need full statement info and a breakdown from each one. Bear in mind that when claiming irresponsible lending, its up to the company to prove you wrong.

If you give me a full breakdown, we might be able to push it in your favour :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info. Have you asked for a Statement from all companies concerned?

 

A Copy of the Credit Reports shouldn't need to be provided because the info from then is significantly different to the info now and cannot be fully relied upon - unless you have a report from around that time.

 

QQ Always seem to do a template response. I dont know why they do that, especially about the website template etc.

I'm happy to help but i need full statement info and a breakdown from each one. Bear in mind that when claiming irresponsible lending, its up to the company to prove you wrong.

If you give me a full breakdown, we might be able to push it in your favour :)

 

Thanks for your help fkofilee.

 

The only benefit that I can see of providing my current credit report, is that it shows 100+ payday loans in the closed account section, meaning at the time when most of these loans would have been made, they should have been able to see the loans from the other companies.

 

I have statement of accounts from all but Wonga, Payday UK and Payday Express (Wonga are still working on my request, and Payday UK and Payday Express have refused to provide them).

 

However, all the information is in a spreadsheet (I have used bank statements for the ones that failed to provide a SoA). It contains loan numbers, APR, dates loans were taken out and dates of payments. i think this spreadsheet will have all the information you will need. How am I best getting this spreadsheet to you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BiB

 

LEts take this a step at a time. The ones that have provided statements, please post them up minus personal info.

As for the CRA Issue. Each Lender can see your CRA Anyway... They just login to their CR Portal... Something isnt quite right with Uncle Buck.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BiB

 

LEts take this a step at a time. The ones that have provided statements, please post them up minus personal info.

As for the CRA Issue. Each Lender can see your CRA Anyway... They just login to their CR Portal... Something isnt quite right with Uncle Buck.

 

I appreciate your help fkofilee. But there is 52 SoA account documents, so its not easy to remove the personal info and upload. The spreadsheet should have all the information you are looking for.

 

Alternatively, I could upload the SoA to drop box (or something similar) and send you the link. As I don't have enough posts to PM you, you could PM me with a password and I will set the link up with that password.

 

Let me know what you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BiB - As i am a site team member you are able to PM the site team.

If you want to post up the spreadsheet , it will be easier but if i need further info then we can go from there :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks fkofilee.

 

Attached is the spreadsheet:

 

- the first tab is the loan summary

- the second tab is the payments/repayments going in and out of my bank

 

The second tab also has a pivot table with the total amount going in and out for each month.

 

Let me know if you need anything else.

 

Thanks again.

CAG Info.xls

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need some time to digest, will continue and update tomorrow. :) We formulate a plan to help.

 

Any thoughts on this? Mr Lender set a deadline of 1st August to respond to their offer of £375. I'm inclined not to take it and lodge it with the FOS, but wanted to hear if you had any thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£375 is not the worst offer we have seen for reclaims. Bare in mind that a lot of irresponsible lending complaints arent set on concrete amounts that you will get back.

On that basis, you decide what youd like to do, however you have nothing to lose.

 

But add in 2 things. Number 1 - The FOS may side with you and if they do, you could be looking at more money as well as CRA removal, you could be looking at the same.

Have Mr LEnder confirmed this is a complaint resolution?

 

In their contact with you did they say it was a final response?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£375 is not the worst offer we have seen for reclaims. Bare in mind that a lot of irresponsible lending complaints arent set on concrete amounts that you will get back.

On that basis, you decide what youd like to do, however you have nothing to lose.

 

But add in 2 things. Number 1 - The FOS may side with you and if they do, you could be looking at more money as well as CRA removal, you could be looking at the same.

Have Mr LEnder confirmed this is a complaint resolution?

 

In their contact with you did they say it was a final response?

 

Thanks. Yes, it was titled 'final response'. The CRA removal is not what I am interested in primarily, as I made all payments, so this is not having a significant impact on my credit rating. The amount they offered was only 11% of what i paid in interest.

 

My main concern is that the lenders will say that I under understated my credit commitments when I took out the loans with them, which may land me in trouble (could that be seen as fraud?). If not for this, I would take them all to the FOS without a moments hesitation as there were months when I was paying out £6k in PDL repayments, when my take home was only £2.8k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Yes, it was titled 'final response'. The CRA removal is not what I am interested in primarily, as I made all payments, so this is not having a significant impact on my credit rating. The amount they offered was only 11% of what i paid in interest.

 

My main concern is that the lenders will say that I under understated my credit commitments when I took out the loans with them, which may land me in trouble (could that be seen as fraud?). If not for this, I would take them all to the FOS without a moments hesitation as there were months when I was paying out £6k in PDL repayments, when my take home was only £2.8k.

 

You need to remember that these loans were supposed to be checked back to front as they are known as HCSTC "High Cost Short Term Credit" - They should have credit checked you and seen your Monthly habits and how much your credit outgoings were etc

And no... Its not necessarily seen as fraud because on e month you could have been better off and the next maybe not...

Its hit and miss. Take it to the FOS if you want.

 

Go for it :) , If you need help with drafting a letter then I think I have one stored somewhere that could be adapted.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to remember that these loans were supposed to be checked back to front as they are known as HCSTC "High Cost Short Term Credit" - They should have credit checked you and seen your Monthly habits and how much your credit outgoings were etc

And no... Its not necessarily seen as fraud because on e month you could have been better off and the next maybe not...

Its hit and miss. Take it to the FOS if you want.

 

Go for it :) , If you need help with drafting a letter then I think I have one stored somewhere that could be adapted.

 

Thanks buddy. I will take them all to the FOS, unless any of them want to settle with a decent offer. I will keep this post updated with progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Sorry for the delay in updating, I was hoping to post one single update once all cases were resolved, but the process with the FOS takes longer than anticipated.

 

First of all, here is the number of days each lender took to respond to my complaint:

 

Mr Lender - 2

Lending Stream LLC - 8

My Jar - 24

Quick Quid - 45

Sunny - 55

Quid Market - 55

Uncle Buck - 59

Payday UK - 67

Payday Express - 68

Wonga – 73

 

Out of the above, three PDLs agreed or partially agreed with me and offered me a substantial refund which I accepted:

 

Sunny - £2,820.71

Uncle Buck - £1,119.75

Wonga - £7,308.33

 

The rest rejected my claim, and in some cases offered me a token payment of between 1-10% of the interest I paid. I rejected their offers and lodged a complaint with the FOS.

 

Below is the number of days it took the FOS Adjudicator to respond with a decision:

 

Payday UK - 34

Quid Market - 39

Payday Express - 40

Quick Quid - 40

My Jar - 40

Mr Lender - 46

Lending Stream LLC – 65

 

In all cases the FOS Adjudicator sided with me and agreed that most of the loans were unaffordable and irresponsibly lent. Two lenders accepted that decision and paid out:

 

My Jar - £1,163.90

Payday UK - £3,350.12

 

The rest I have referred to the FOS Ombudsman. This part is taking a lot longer. However, I have just had my first response back from the FOS Ombudsman (after 200 days) and they have agreed with the FOS Adjudicator, and have ordered Payday Express to refund me £1,297.74.

 

So, as it stands:

 

• I have received £15,762.81 in payments already.

• I have another £1,297.74 being paid out in the next 4 weeks.

• I am awaiting on the FOS Ombudsman ruling on 4 more complaints (which the FOS Adjudicator ruled with me on, which is worth another £11,697.82)

 

 

I can’t believe that I nearly did bother reclaiming this money, or was contemplating letting a 3rd party claim company do it for a 30% cut.

 

My advice out there to anyone who is considering doing this is to just do it. Even just a letter to the PDL may be enough to get something.

 

Will post again with the outcomes when my final 4 complaints are addressed.

Edited by back-in-black
Link to post
Share on other sites

what a wonderful account

it will be a beacon for others.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...