Jump to content


UKCPS/? PCN nov 2015 Claimform - Driver-passengers observed leaving site - WEST QUAY RETAIL HULL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

I am in the same boat.

 

Got a penalty charge in Nov 2015 and ignored it.

 

Had read the info about these kind of parking tickets and follow the advice to ignored them.

 

Had one NtK letter following the ticket and then nothing

 

yesterday when I got court claim form.

 

I will defend it but any advice from you guys will be much appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I've started a new thread for you, you might get missed on someone else's old one.

 

Can I just check that your claim form is from UKCPS please?

 

And can you tell us their particulars of claim [POCs], without identifying details and tell us the date of issue of the claim? This will help us to advise.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well,

the reason has already been spat out by a court with Ibbotson v VCS so you should look that up for starters.

 

I would also bet that the signage is deficient in any case so tell us more about where the car park was

and we would also like to see the NTK they sent.

 

It would be laughable to think that they would believe they have a contract with the driver

and then say that the passenger was observed leaving the site

 

why not just pick people randomly from the electoral roll and say they they were observed elsewhere

so the driver must be liable for the actions of the entire population.

 

However, you must acknowledge the claim within 12 days and submit a defence within the month.

 

I would suggest that posting up an image of the signage will allow us to find even more reasons

why this claim is doomed and I bet the NTK is no better and thus no keeper liability anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issue date 15 June 2016

 

Hello.

I first posted this (before it has been moved to a new thread) under the thread which was same car parking and reason for fine. It is WEST QUAY RETAIL HULL.

I am trying to find out how to upload an image.

Thank you for your responses.

^5A3AE9F940A27963BB12286536D06C9B8510B27328DA89E351^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are actually trying to say their silly made up charges are commercially viable? Hahaha

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

btw, UKCPS NEVER get anything right. With every single ticket or claim they make huge mistakes.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

an you fill this out please

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?465231-.Received-a-Court-Claim-From-A-Private-parking-Speculative-invoice-How-To-Deal-With-It-HERE***(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

and as in post 1.

it is NOT A PENALTY CHARGE

they cant issue penalties

only police/council can.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello guys, those are the answers :

 

Name of the Claimant ?

 

UKCPS LTD

1200

CENTURY WAY

THORPE PARK BUSINESS PARK

COLTON

LS15 8ZA

 

 

Date of issue

 

15 JUNE 2016

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

 

^5A3AE9F940A27963BB12286536D06C9B8510B27328DA89E351^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.jpg

 

What is the value of the claim?

 

Amount claimed 150.00

Court fee 25.00

Legal representative's cost 0.00

Total amount 175.00

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ?

 

Not quite sure about that question. There is no mention any debt collector.

 

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

 

I have not received Notice of Assignment.

 

 

Thank you very much in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

go up on the MCOL website

 

and ack [AOS] the claim

 

defend all

leave juris unticked

exit mcol.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

I have done this yesterday.

I was wondering about juris and left it unticked.

 

I am reading Obbotson case and found it useful.

Time to do the defence. I will need help with that.

 

Thanks a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

def not due till / by 4pm Friday 15th

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

I am reading sample appealing letters to POPLa and just wonder if I can use them as my defence.

Or in court defence I need to use some different way of defense?

 

That could be my points:

1. The sum sought is not representative of any genuine pre-estimate of loss flowing from any breach of terms and conditions.

2. You allege 'Driver - Passengers observed leaving site' however you have provided no evidence of this nor, if this was the case did your employee/representative take any steps to mitigate the loss.

 

 

I have limit of 120 words to use.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have a limit via mcol

 

If you look at recent claims in this forum

 

There are defences there

And in our sticky on homepage of this forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Roughly

But you have until 15th

So no rush

I,m sure EB will help

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so they can legally hold the driver captive

and stop him from leaving for the duration of the stay>>>

urm..I don't think so.

that's imprisonment!!:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sign also isnt compliant .

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesnt matter. The sign isnt compliant.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...