Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Reply from Halifax / Capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received this in the post today

 

Along with my original CCA letter.

Any advice? I dont know what details they have as I have moved a number of times since then.

If it was a credit card I would have thought capquest would have the details

 

Just double checked on my Noodle account.

It is listed in my closed accounts (if it is that one)

and is shown as settled in Dec 2010 with no missed payments.

 

Edit: it cant be that one on the account as my card limit was £1000 and have been paying £6.52 for years and my outstanding balance is shown as £1211.14 and the account is settled properly.

 

Edit 2: Is it worth doing a SAR with CapQuest to see what they have on file and amounts?

Image.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are you paying?

 

If it is a powerless DCA such as Cr@pquest then STOP!

 

Primarily because you're paying something that you have no idea what its for?

 

Blindly stumping up money because a powerless clown outfit has told you to, is simply burning money.

 

If you have no idea what you're paying for, then STOP. Demand that they prove you actually owe this.

 

You're being cash cowed, and they know it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, you've been royally shafted!

 

You seriously need to get rid of Gregory Pennington, and demand back all of the fees you have paid them.

 

These companies are only in it for your money, STOP paying GP, demand back all of their fees, and demand to see the entire history of ALL the payments they 'claim' to have made to these creditors.

 

PLEASE, stop throwing your money away.

 

I appreciate that it might have seemed a good idea at the time, but seriously, outfits like GP are only out to make profit from you.

 

If any of your creditors contact you in the future, then come back and tell us what they said, if your credit file is clear, then it is highly likely that you either didn't owe the money in the first place, or it is now so old, that they have dropped off your credit file (6 years from date it was placed on your file).

 

And if it is the latter, then the money you have been gifting GP has gone into their pocket.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god not the grabbing penny's

 

 

fleeced blind.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, you've been royally shafted!

 

You seriously need to get rid of Gregory Pennington, and demand back all of the fees you have paid them.

 

These companies are only in it for your money, STOP paying GP, demand back all of their fees, and demand to see the entire history of ALL the payments they 'claim' to have made to these creditors.

 

PLEASE, stop throwing your money away.

 

I appreciate that it might have seemed a good idea at the time, but seriously, outfits like GP are only out to make profit from you.

 

If any of your creditors contact you in the future, then come back and tell us what they said, if your credit file is clear, then it is highly likely that you either didn't owe the money in the first place, or it is now so old, that they have dropped off your credit file (6 years from date it was placed on your file).

 

And if it is the latter, then the money you have been gifting GP has gone into their pocket.

 

I stopped paying Gregory Pennington a number of months ago now as I came to that conclusion.

I am not going to make another payment to CapQuest and we shall see where we go from there.

 

 

I did a CCA and the letter from post one is what I received in reply

- which I dont know if I should just ignore.

 

Like I said the only thing on my credit file for Halifax is a credit card with a max balance of £1000

 

Halifax Credit Card 31/12/2010 Settled

 

It also shows as no missed payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a capquest ref number

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so did you not use that in the CCA request you sent to cabot?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i'd be inclined to copy that lot

and post it to crapbot...

 

covering letter stating that even Halifax have no clue

what supposed debt you have fleeced me on for XXyrs.

 

should you fail to honour my CCA request within a further 14 days

I hereby demand all my payments back.

 

............

 

sadly you'll prob find this with many of your debts

blindly paid through the greedy pennies..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this sound?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am writing with reference to the above account.

 

 

On 27/05/2016 i sent you a CCA request.

You forwarded my request to Halifax.

Please see the enclosed copy of their reply.

 

 

As you have failed the request and are unable to prove any information, I demand ALL my money repaying.

as you don't even appear to know what the debt is originally for.

 

 

I remind you I am still waiting for a response under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (sections 77-79).

I will be kind and give you a further 14 days to supply me with the requested docu-mentation.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

I will NOT deal with this matter via the telephone only via post.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't ever use the word basically in a letter

its very bad English even in the spoken word. should be banned!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try it now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just had a letter from capquest saying

"thank you for your recent communication

we have been advised by our client that they have issues the documentation requested under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 directly to you. Please contact us to confirm that you have received the documentation"

 

I have not had anything other than the letter from Halifax as above. I am sure I am just looking for confirmation that I just need to ignore this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

I have sent a few requests to Halfiax using the number on the letter they sent me to notify me they are transferring my debt from capquest to wescot

 

It says

I refer to your recent letter, however unfortunately I am unable to locate an agreement using the information supplied.

 

If you have not already done so already, can you provide me with the following

  • Type of Account
  • Full address details (including all previous addresses)
  • Any Change of Name
  • Date Account opened
  • Agreement Number

 

You may be able to obtain this from any bank statements displaying the direct debit associated with the agreement.

 

I apologise for any inconvenience caused and enclose your original documentation.

 

This is the same response as last time. I am assuming they don't have the details considering I am using the same refrence number they are chasing me under plus they have my address as they have sent me a statement.

I also sent an SAR to them which looks like its been forwarded to the customer services.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep to one thread eh..

 

then we'll know what you are going on about please

 

threads merged

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so did you get your moneyback from the fleecers greedy penny's were paying?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...