Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt advice for dad on deceased moms debt - provident/debt managers ( services ) ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My mum died three weeks ago and left some debt that my father has no knowledge of ,

one was a loan and has a balance of £2000 and the other is a debt of £300 .

 

The loan was to a well known loan company and the debt is being sought by a DCA

 

Can anyone advise me on my next step ?

 

My father is 84 and is nearly housebound and is not capable of handling this situation

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi , and thank you for your response

 

The DCA is a Letter of Non-Payment Notification addressed to both my Mum and Dad

 

The Loan is a letter solely addressed to my Dad

 

My mum handled everything to do with money in the house which makes me think that my Dad wouldn't know a thing about this

 

My sister told me that the both companies know about my Mum's death but apparently still pursuing debt

 

I would need to send them a Subject Access Request but they wont as it's not my account

 

thanks HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

name names please

are the debts joint

or solely in her name?

important!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are writing to your dad becasue they know that your mum is dead and the debt is now impossible to collect.

they are hoping that a vulnerable bereaved person will pay up as he thinks there is an obligation to do so.

 

If you mother had any estate that was hers and not jopintly owned with your father then they have a claim on that.

Estate is property, stocks and shares, money in the bank and certain high value works of art or collections

(such as a collection of vintage cars or important pieces of jewellery).

 

How valuable?

Well if they put her estate over the £325k IHT threshold then that is estate and not personal effects.

Let us assume that she had no estate, then they can go screw themselves and should be told to do so in no uncertain terms.

 

The debt is no-one elses and if she had a will then it is for the executor to deal with.

If no will and the estate is small then anyone can take it upon themselves to sort out matters

and inform the probate registry what has gone on

 

if the estate is less than £10k there will be no fee,

£10k-£350k it is currently about £150 for grant of probate but that is about to change.

 

If all she had was a few quid in the bank them pay the funeral costs out of that

and if there is any left over pay them in proportion

but would anyone with money in the bank borrow from these people?

i doubt it.

 

If they persist report them to the relevant governing body,

probably the FCA They should be reported for bothering your dad anyway.

 

Make acomplaint to their head of legal compliance.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Think this is the route , I will phone them them first to introduce myself then ask my dad for a letter of Authority

 

Will be back to let you know any response

 

Many thanks

 

provident and debt managers ( services ) ltd

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the estate is less than £10k there will be no fee,

£10k-£350k it is currently about £150 for grant of probate but that is about to change.

 

You are a little out on the scale of fees.

 

Under £5,000, no fee to pay when applying for probate.

Over that, the fee is £215 (solicitors get a discounted rate, but then charge for their services).

 

If the OP is applying for probate, then he can make a Subject Access Request as the personal representative of the deceased. It is also worth demanding a copy of any credit agreements before discussing anything else.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can debt companies ask / force pensioners to pay debt from pension / benefits ?

 

I think you could deal with this on your father's behalf if he signs a letter of authority for you.

 

HB

 

Both companies have accepted verbal authority over the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore the no powers DCA's

they are NOT BAILIFFS!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just throwing in another thought.

 

Were your parents or your mother in a position to repay these loans out of their income? I was just wondering about irresponsible lending being a possibility.

 

HB

 

Hi HB , i`m calling both companies tomorrow and my father will give his verbal consent to allow me to look after this on his behalf

 

Can you advise as to questions to ask or will i just ask for a copy of the original credit agreement

 

Many thanks

 

RS

Link to post
Share on other sites

are the debts joint

or solely in her name?

important!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

went to my dad`s today and telephoned Provident and Debt Managers Services

and both to my dismay decided not to accept a verbal authority .

 

They now require written authority for me to take this any further

 

Do i apply for a Subject Access Request with written authority from my father

or just request the original Credit Agreement with written authority

 

My father has no recollection of signing anything re Provident / Debt Managers Services .

 

With regards to the Debt Managers Services letter it says .

... Account due to ....

Moorcroft Debt Recovery

 

Any help would be grateful

 

regards

 

RS

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with any SAR

.

you send a CCA request

to each.

don't sign anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received reply from Debt Managers ( Services ) Ltd

 

We are in receipt of your request under The Consumer Credit Act 1974 . Unfortunately this request cannot

 

be granted as there is no agreement available . please find enclosed your letter with £1 fee attached .

 

To discus this matter and to help you further with your queries regarding this matter , please contact us on 00000 000000 and we will assist you .

 

sincerely

 

DMS LTD

 

 

Can anyone help with the next step

 

Many Thanks

 

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what type ofd ebt are they chasing then?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so even they don't even know what type of debt they are chasing?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...