Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Baclays Partner Finance- Default Charges CourtClaim issued


ewgm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You can either accept or decline Barclay's offer/seek legal redress. Any reply is yours alone, even if provided by us.

Whether you remain a Barclay's customer is your decision.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi EWGM,

 

IMHO you're over-thinking this.

 

All you need do is reply to the offer saying, "I am not willing to accept your latest offer and will continue with my court claim."

 

Sending a complaint to Barclays CEO is a waste of time. You've started court action against the bank and it's their prerogative to use internal or external solicitors to defend. They're entitled to make whatever offer they want at any stage.

 

Your court claim is very important to you but, for the solicitors, it's just another file to deal with during their working day. If they pay with 14 or 28 days, it doesn't matter so long as you're happy with the offer made.

 

If you can be more objective in dealing with your claim, you'll be better placed to focus on the important issues, and ignore those that are not.

 

You didn't reply to my Q about preparing your evidence in my last post.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, now I see what you're saying.

 

I know they're not offering to settle as per your PoC.

 

Any agreement as regards settlement of your current case would include matters arising up to now. You would NOT be signing away your right to take court action in the future regarding other issues that may arise.

 

I do NOT think you should accept their current offer if you're not happy about it. Stick to your guns and they are likely to offer more before a hearing.

 

Have you started to prepare the evidence you'll need to submit to court and the bank (normally) 14 days before the hearing date set by the court ? Get started on this in good time or you'll be panicking to put it all together by the due date.

I have started the court bundle and is nearly ready as I referred to your statement somewhere in the forums that BPF bundles is similar to BC isn't?

:-)

 

I have also noticed that I took the Barclays solicitor offer very personal. I have to come down now and took this matter more objectively.

 

Thanks @slick132

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have started the court bundle and is nearly ready as I referred to your statement somewhere in the forums that BPF bundles is similar to BC isn't?

 

Yes, your evidence for this BPF case will be similar to that used for reclaiming BC penalty charges. However, you need to ensure that you adapt the evidence carefully to reflect that your BPF case is a claim for refund of penalty charges on your bank loan a/c.

 

You can prepare all the doc'ts and store them on your computer. You only need to print out 2 copies when they are to be Filed and Served in accordance with the courts' Directions. You'll only print out the 3rd copy if it's needed for you to take when going to the actual court hearing.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @slick132

 

The mediation team sent me a letter and advised that I will receive court directions within 8 days but I have not received anything yet.

 

Thank you Sir for the directions and I will update you once I complete the court bundle process.

 

Rgds

 

ewgm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello @Andyorch, @slick132 and @martin2006

 

I'm back again for another update on the claim. I have received the court date for healing which is in the 2nd week of January 2017. I have paid the court fee for hearing on Monday.

 

Today I have received another offer from Barclays solicitor contains this statement;

 

"....... in full and final settlement of all and any claims that the Claimant has, had or may have against the Defendant in connection with the facts and matters raised in the Claim and any other matter arising out of or connected with the relationship between them, whether or not presently known."

 

"...hereby immediately, unconditionally and irrevocably withdraws and release any claims, complaints, commitments, obligations, liabilities, or issues (if any) however arising against the defendant and its agents and representatives, arising out of or in connection with the Claim and/or any other matter arising from the relationship between the Parties."

 

Please help me what are they intent with those statements? Bear in mind that I'm still holding personal and partners account with them. I have also file a complaint to Financial Ombudsman Service against Barclays for charges error on my personal account.

 

My main concerns is violation of my rights in the future, please help :juggle::???::noidea:

 

ewgm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its basically stating that if you agree, then you cannot start a separate claim against another account you may hold with them.

 

Fine if you have no other dealings with them but absolutely not if you have other accounts, it would give them cart blance to add charges in the future without you being able to do a thing about it.

 

Personally i would write back rewording it to be specifically about the account in question, otherwise you must reject the offer under those terms.

Edited by martin2006

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply state " okay but only applicable to account number xxxxxxxxxxx " :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi EW,

 

Have they offered you an amount close enough to your claim total for you to consider accepting ?

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi EW,

 

Have they offered you an amount close enough to your claim total for you to consider accepting ?

 

Hi @slick132

 

The amount is closer enough to my claim total and considering to accept it. But with those conditions attached I'm thinking kind of selling my rights, isn't?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, this is YOUR claim and you can decide what to accept or not including any terms/conditions.

 

Others have already told you to alter any acceptance so it refers only to this account.

 

Unless the bank or sol'rs agree to what YOU reasonably want, continue the claim for now.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi @slick132 @Andyorch

 

Barclays solicitors contacted me today asking whether I am willing to accept their offer but their client insisting on this condition;

 

"........... the claimant hereby immediately, unconditionally and irrevocably withdraws and releases any claim, complaints, commitments, obligations, liabilities or issues (if any) howsoever arising against the defendant and its agents and representatives, arising out of or in connection with the claim."

 

I did reply their first email and insist should only be applicable on the account which I claimed, but still Barclays insist on the statement above. Also, in our joint account my Mrs sent a formal complaint about the account's mismanagement.

 

I don't want to accept something which might cause problems in the future.

 

Please HELP!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says, " .......... arising out of or in connection with the claim."

 

So any other issue that is NOT connected with the current court claim could be the subject of another action.

 

The only thing you could NOT do is make a further complaint/claim for refund of default charges on THIS account.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says, " .......... arising out of or in connection with the claim."

 

So any other issue that is NOT connected with the current court claim could be the subject of another action.

 

The only thing you could NOT do is make a further complaint/claim for refund of default charges on THIS account.

 

:-)

 

Thanks @slick132

 

I will accept in principle but pending on terms and conditions of Tomlin Order.

 

I will feedback once I receive it.

 

:doh::hail: All so far

 

ewgm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...