Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hoist/? claimform - old Barclaycard 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


joebloggs72
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

already pointed out the issues

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 308
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The issues listed where written before i posted a copy of what they sent me so maybe some of them maybe not be correct now and as previously mentioned that confused the hell out of me hence why andy said best thing was to scan a copy of what they sent ....physically seeing what was sent might change some of the issues

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha as we guessed

std 620000 rubbish they roll out for every claim.

 

and for a 2010 agreement your was years before?

 

 

your agreement was signed in 2002

that lot is from 2010

bogroll

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh thankyou

i didnt know that would even make a difference

 

i thought they would just say that it was a varied agreement and terms change over time or some other **** paper as you put it :)

 

so being really stupid now

when this finally goes to court do i rely solely on that ..

 

. i like to be prepard in my thinking and this is seriously out my comfort zone and i only owe the two debts but either will cripple me if found against me

Link to post
Share on other sites

and anyway you've not had notice of allocation from the court yet....so

that bogroll just willy waving

 

 

wait and see

doesn't mean its going anyway still a speculative claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to upload it Joe..makes life easy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joe,

 

Please post the doc here as Andy suggests.

 

Re Mediation, the mediator will ONLY be interested in seeing if the 2 parties are willing and able to compromise and agree a settlement acceptable to both. The Mediator will not be interested in what you have or haven't received.

 

The mediator will want to know what you're prepared to offer to settle the claim, and if the Claimant is willing to accept that amount in settlement. If you're NOT prepared to offer anything because you think the Claimant's claim is weak, just confirm you're unwilling to make any offer.

 

That will stop the mediation process but will NOT affect the validity of the claim or your defence. The process will move on to be dealt with by your local County Court.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

guys the CCA return is in post 247 if that's what you keep asking for?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the cover letter attached to the reconstituted version of the agreement...they claim that your recon agreement as varied in accordance with section 82 (1) of The CCA 1974.

 

Have a read of that section....

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/82

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

andy to my shame i aint that smart

i read it and then read it again and still none the wiser the more times i have read it the stupider i feel ..

 

.why legal talk has to be designed that it confuses the be jesus out of most ppl .

 

..unless you was aiming for the section where a modifying agreement overrides a earlier one

so even though this one is dated 2010 it over rides the original one i had.

 

.. thats as far as my poor brain would take me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Close ...but yes...if the agreement has been varied then a recon wont wash......as it wont anyway as this is a pre 2007 agreement.

 

Just a further argument thats all.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i guess i just wait now till a court date or what ever happens next happens once i get info will come back here ...cause as it stands lol if i went before a judge and he asked a question i would be like eh...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a call from the mediation people today as i missed a email they sent me out on the 19th went to spam..

 

its for a mediation call for the 12th june .

. do i just agree to this?

 

as the question its asks in the email and if you say no to any of them then it says mediation is not for me..

 

. i ask to what purpose the mediation serves as i cant pay or offer a compromise to whats owed .

 

unless they're willing to take a massive discount on the original debt not the inflated amount they now want i couldnt even consider it

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 258 refers...

 

if you've not receive all the required paperwork

they will ask the same questions as in their email.

 

you say no you haven't

mediation will fails.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

any advice on my plan of action?

 

i have the sars but what am i looking for in it .

..mediation is on monday morning

 

from what i have read the argeement needs to be accurate as the agreement was when the card was taken on on its terms and conditions?

 

i have statements from the SAR that show my interest rate was only 1.0xxx percent per month at the time but the agreement i believe shows a much higher rate

 

would this and the face parts of it are not readable justify it failing as a true copy of the agreement?

 

it not being signed doesnt seem to matter nowadays if that is the sole defence

 

my continued thanx on any help given

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If you havent sent an SAR request yet it maybe worth looking into as well, takes 40days allegedly and costs £10. Barclaycard are not the best to deal with as you apply online and all the call centres are in India and no one seems to know what youre talking about when you chase it up.

 

so any advice on my plan of action? i have the sars but what am i looking for in it ...mediation is on monday morning from what i have read the argeement needs to be accurate as the agreement was when the card was taken on on its terms and conditions? i have statements from the SAR that show my interest rate was only 1.0xxx percent per month at the time but the agreement i believe shows a much higher rate would this and the face parts of it are not readable justify it failing as a true copy of the agreement? it not being signed doesnt seem to matter nowadays if that is the sole defense

 

my continued thanx on any help given

 

Perhaps mpmmpmpmp could advise as he advised you to do a SAR...

 

I would simpy follow the Court Directions as per the Notice of Allocation...nothing in the SAR can help you.

 

Andy

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats disappointing

i was hoping when it finally goes to court and they do their witness statement thing and tell the court the agreement they're using is accurate

- that when i say it isnt cause the rates are different here is a old statement showing a different rate

- and the fact you cant read all of the agreement

( thought there was a part that says a CCA has to be basically readable by the debtor to be valid in its terms and conditions)

 

 

- the court would throw the agreement out I

- s alot of conflicting information on the web over agreements and trying to pick fact from fiction so i can try and make a defence or all this has just been a waste of time if the inevitable is going to happen anyway...

 

have a couple questions from what i think i understand

defaults ccj all fall off your credit file after 6 years regardless if there paid or not?

 

 

i am not bothered about the debt

but i wanted to clean up my credit file so my credit rating would improve

and it was till the only two debts i am in default with showed up..

 

 

if i was paying them even a token payment would that still show up if i was still paying after 5 years or does that drop off too and i just carry on paying it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you should be able to see that the recon is invalid just from looking at it....a reconstituted version would be pristine .if you cant read it then there is another fault.

 

Illegibility of agreements is covered by the CCA1974 sec61 not the creditors terms and conditions.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61

 

If the Interest rates and T&Cs are not connected to the alleged agreement that is covered by section 77/78 of the CCA1974.

 

Why would you consider it all a waste of time to try to defend a claim ? If not defended they would have a judgment by now without any say/challenge from yourself...you have yet to get to directions and disclosure /witness statement stage.....how do you know they will comply ? How do you know they will not discontinue ?

 

With regards to your questions in the event that they do attain a judgment...yes a CCJ will only show for 6 years..paid unpaid partially paid partially settled.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never received any documents after my SAR so Im not sure what it contains.

 

I was hoping to find a discrepancy between my original agreement and the reconstituted agreement which would show it wasnt a true copy of the original agreement as it must be.

 

Don't think it really matters as s78 requests are only valid on live agreements(something I wasnt aware of at the time).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think it really matters as s78 requests are only valid on live agreements(something I wasnt aware of at the time).

 

 

Probably because its nonsense :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you should be able to see that the recon is invalid just from looking at it....a reconstituted version would be pristine .if you cant read it then there is another fault.

 

Illegibility of agreements is covered by the CCA1974 sec61 not the creditors terms and conditions.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61

 

If the Interest rates and T&Cs are not connected to the alleged agreement that is covered by section 77/78 of the CCA1974.

 

Why would you consider it all a waste of time to try to defend a claim ? If not defended they would have a judgment by now without any say/challenge from yourself...you have yet to get to directions and disclosure /witness statement stage.....how do you know they will comply ? How do you know they will not discontinue ?

 

With regards to your questions in the event that they do attain a judgment...yes a CCJ will only show for 6 years..paid unpaid partially paid partially settled.

 

Andy

 

 

I have no idea whats connected to what as regards to the agreement

most of this is second nature to most of you .

.what you might see as very obvious isnt to me.

 

i have no idea how things move along as regards to the time line of being summonded to when a judgement is made .

 

 

.and i am trying to work out what my defence my chances of winning hinges on .

.the more i have sat and thought the original agreement would of been one of them generic postal applications you signed and waited to see if you got sent a card.

 

 

.as for a waste of time i meant unless i have a defence that i can get my teeth into with a chance of winning and not just grasping at straws hoping i get a decent judge when the time comes .

.i am hoping they dont turn up lol but how often does that happen if its being defended?

 

i did hope the SAR would list what the debt was sold for at least then i would have a bargaining tool if i was to offer a settlement

 

 

..if i have a decent chance of winning then i would be stupid to try and settle

but if i am flogging a dead horse trying to get the best deal without a judgement against me would be the best scenero as this debt falls off my credit file in november

 

 

a ccj would leave it there for anoher 6 years .

.. i am just looking at all angles and outcomes trying to work out the best one for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...