Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, Hotpoint UK has been a subsidiary of Whirlpool for over 20 years. And unlike some domestic goods manufacturers you can buy from them direct and I believe they employ their own service engineers, Is that your situation? You bought direct from Hotpoint and Hotpoint sent out their own engineer?
    • It's Hotpoint (but I believe they're part of the Whirlpool group now?). The part was bought direct from them as a consumer.
    • Thanks BankFodder for your latest, I'm in complete agreement on the subject of mediation and will be choosing to decline mediation, the longer timeline is not an issue for me, I will happily let the going to court run it's course. I really appreciate the support from the Consumer Action Group. I'll post the email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response. Regards, J    email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response:  
    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas Standing Charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2862 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

I am involved in a long running dispute with British Gas over standing charges. I wanted to see if anyone can clarify the position on what can be done by them to enforce payment.

 

The situation we have is that we have only one gas appliance, a gas fire, that it never used as it is boxed in by stuff, in a very cluttered front room. I cannot remember the last time it was used.

 

 

British Gas insist that they are obliged to levy standing charges even when we never use gas.

They have also seen fit to send a debt collection company to visit me.

 

I should mention that I am a vulnerable customer insofar as I suffered a stroke 3 years ago

and my ability to earn has been affected by this.

 

 

I have explained all this to British Gas several times and they won't budge.

The current bill for these charges is around £100.

 

Is there anything I can do to get these people off my back?

I have retained the supply as a standby for years

but I think it's time to have the supply disconnected once and for all and put an end to all this grief.

 

Any advice would be very welcome. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you have a gas meter installed, british gas will charge you the standing charge, whilst they are your supplier

 

Few questions

 

1. is this a standard meter and you get a bill or a pre payment meter?

2. have you considered having the meter removed if you dont use gas?

3. have you considered moving to a supplier with no standing charge? (easy to check with comparison sites)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes they have read the meter and agreed that I have not used any gas, as there is no estimated use on any bill they produce. The sticking point is these wretched charges they insist on adding and I wanted to know what, if anything, I can do about them. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's a standard meter and like I said, I only kept the supply just in case of any electricity problems or loss. I wasn't aware that there were companies that didn't make standing charges. British Gas have always cracked on that they are obliged to make these charges by law, so clearly that is not the case. Thank you for that information, I can now use that fact as leverage against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also advise not to even consider using a gas fire if it hasnt been used in years until it has been serviced and tested if that last use was more than 12 months ago, safety first!

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes they have read the meter and agreed that I have not used any gas, as there is no estimated use on any bill they produce. The sticking point is these wretched charges they insist on adding and I wanted to know what, if anything, I can do about them. Thanks.

 

 

Standing charges are a con on the British Public so fight it.

 

 

 

Assuming that you had a no standing charge account before and they had unilaterally changed your tariff structure without your agreement or knowledge fight it.

 

 

Standard Licence conditions SLC 22 A states ( you can get this off the Ofgem web site:-

 

 

 

 

Condition 22A. Unit Rate and Standing Charge requirements

22A.1 The licensee must only:

(a) offer to supply a Domestic Customer on the basis of a Domestic Supply Contract which complies with standard condition 22A; and

(b) supply a Domestic Customer on the basis of a Domestic Supply Contract or a Deemed Contract which complies with standard condition 22A.

22A.2 In respect of supplying electricity to a Domestic Customer under a Deemed Contract or Domestic Supply Contract, the licensee must ensure that all Charges for Supply Activities are incorporated within:

(a) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a NonTime of Use Tariff:

(i) a single Standing Charge; and/or

(ii) a single Unit Rate; and

(b) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff:

(i) a single Standing Charge; and/or

(ii) Time of Use Rates.

22A.3 In relation to any Domestic Supply Contract and any Deemed Contract the licensee must ensure that:

(a) unless the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff, the Charges for the Supply of Electricity:

(i) include a single Standing Charge;

(ii) include a single Unit Rate; and

(iii) do not include any other Unit Rate or Unit Rates;

(b) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff, the Charges for the Supply of Electricity:

(i) include a single Standing Charge;

 

(ii) include Time of Use Rates; and

(iii) do not include any other Unit Rate or Unit Rates;

© without prejudice to the Tariff Comparison Rate, when the licensee or any Representative displays or communicates the Charges for the Supply of Electricity in any form each of the following are separately identified from each other and any other charges:

(i) a Standing Charge;

(ii) the Unit Rate or, where applicable, Time of Use Rates.

 

 

 

 

Note the and/or . There is nothing stopping companies offering kWH unit tariff only. They lie to customers.

 

 

point 2 SLC 23.3 states

 

 

Notification of increase in Charges for the Supply of Electricity and other unilateral variations

23.3 If, in accordance with the terms of a Domestic Supply Contract with a Domestic Customer, the licensee: (a) increases the Charges for the Supply of Electricity to a Domestic Premises (including by making any reduction in the amount of a Discount that is applied to a Unit Rate or Standing Charge); or (b) unilaterally varies any other term of the contract in any other way that is to the disadvantage of the Domestic Customer ("Disadvantageous Unilateral Variation"),

 

 

the licensee must give Notice of that increase in the Charges for the Supply of Electricity or Disadvantageous Unilateral Variation to the Domestic Customer in accordance with paragraph 23.4. 23.3A Paragraph 23.3(a) does not apply where the licensee increases the Charges for the Supply of Electricity to a Domestic Premises (including by making any reduction in the amount of a Discount that is applied to a Unit Rate or Standing Charge) by:

(a) a mutual variation made pursuant to standard condition 23A; (b) a unilateral variation made pursuant to standard condition 22D; or

© any circumstances whereby a Domestic Customer becomes subject to the Relevant Cheapest Evergreen Tariff or the duration of a Fixed Term Supply Contract is extended for a further fixed term period in accordance with standard condition 22C.

23.3B Paragraph 23.3(b) does not apply:

(a) in any circumstances whereby a Domestic Customer becomes subject to the Relevant Cheapest Evergreen Tariff or the duration of a Fixed Term Supply Contract is extended for a further fixed term period in accordance with standard condition 22C; or

(b) where the licensee is making a Disadvantageous Unilateral Variation by a unilateral variation made pursuant to standard condition 22D.

23.4 The Notice referred to in paragraph 23.3 must:

(a) be given at least 30 days in advance of the date on which the variation has effect;

(b) inform the Domestic Customer that he may end the Domestic Supply Contract if the variation is unacceptable to him by changing his Electricity Supplier;

© inform the Domestic Customer where he may obtain impartial advice and information about changing his Electricity Supplier;

(d) inform the Domestic Customer that where he has any Outstanding Charges, his Electricity Supplier may be able to prevent a Proposed Supply Transfer; and

(e) explain the effect of paragraph 23.6.

 

 

 

 

If the did not comply with these reject the charges and fight, it

 

 

Go to Ofgem site look into their fines to energy companies for the very same thing.

 

 

Point 3

Sending debit collectors in a genuine dispute is harassment. Tell them to go **** off.

 

 

Write to the energy company quote section 2 and 3 of the Protection of Harassment 1997 that their "course of conduct" amount's to harassment which is a criminal and civil offence.

 

 

They are trying to bully you, hold you ground , energy companies are just gangsters in disguise.

Come back to me if you are still unsure

 

 

Please bear in mind no domestic customer ever paid standing charges , it was a business rate only and Ofgem ( who are not fit for purpose) are to blame for been conned by energy companies lies.

 

 

Stevie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standing charges are what they are

Just because you do not use the appliance is not a excuse

It would of been in terms of business when you chose them as a supplier

 

Why not CHANGE TO A ZERO STANDING CHARGE SUPPLIER

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I object to the notion that standing charges in domestic situation are legit.

 

They are a con on the British People and the standard licence conditions allow for non standing charge tariffs, but when you are quoted such a tariff the uplift the kWH rate to cover the £100 + a year the are trying to fleece customers off.

 

Its time customer challenge such naive views with the energy companies.

My recommendation is dispute it , don't pay it and then the have to take you to court to win the argument.

 

This also occurs as noted by the CMA in their shocking recent report on ECO 7 Tariff's .

Proper and free competition is what customers want.

Energy companies are the law breakers.

 

Stevie

 

 

Standing charges are what they are

Just because you do not use the appliance is not a excuse

It would of been in terms of business when you chose them as a supplier

 

Why not CHANGE TO A ZERO STANDING CHARGE SUPPLIER

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all very much and thank you Stevie for some very useful information.

 

I have emailed British Gas. It's not the fact that they are making these charges so much as the aggressive way they have been trying to squeeze me to pay them. I have very limited income and simply cannot afford the £100.

 

I have said in the email that if it is their decision to apply these charges in the first place as not every energy supplier does, then it follows that it is also their decision to waive the charges in certain situations, such as hardship. I have really had enough and I said as much and I have told them that if they insist on pursuing this, I shall make it my business to give them as much bad publicity as I can.

 

I have also suggested that they go after the people who deserve it and not pick on vulnerable customers. I shall be interested to hear what they have to say.

 

I shall keep you posted and thanks again for all the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again I list below the law Pursuant to the Utilities Act 2000 / standard licence condition. Please read it .

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/27/contents

 

Note in the standard licence conditions ( SLC) the And /or repeated on several occasion's where its a time of day ( ECO & or Similar) tariff or you pay one rate regardless of time of day.

 

The discretion is in the law already. But they do not tell you this .

Please start by asking forcibly what is the standing charge for in "domestic " tariffs. Gather the evidence against them from different sources.

I could give you 6 different answers from various energy companies many of them law serial breakers. It's a con simple.

 

Also I refer you to the conditions of Contract SLC 22.5 again below, they must provide a maintenance schedule and indicate the number of visits. I bet you do not have this.

 

So they energy companies are breaking the law are in the wrong and they know this. So fight them You have my support.

 

Tariff SLC 22A

 

Condition 22A. Unit Rate and Standing Charge requirements

22A.1 The licensee must only:

(a) offer to supply a Domestic Customer on the basis of a Domestic Supply Contract which complies with standard condition 22A; and

(b) supply a Domestic Customer on the basis of a Domestic Supply Contract or a Deemed Contract which complies with standard condition 22A.

22A.2 In respect of supplying electricity to a Domestic Customer under a Deemed Contract or Domestic Supply Contract, the licensee must ensure that all Charges for Supply Activities are incorporated within:

 

(a) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a NonTime of Use Tariff:

(i) a single Standing Charge; and/or

(ii) a single Unit Rate; and

(b) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff:

(i) a single Standing Charge; and/or

(ii) Time of Use Rates.

22A.3 In relation to any Domestic Supply Contract and any Deemed Contract the licensee must ensure that:

(a) unless the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff, the Charges for the Supply of Electricity:

(i) include a single Standing Charge;

(ii) include a single Unit Rate; and

(iii) do not include any other Unit Rate or Unit Rates;

(b) where the Domestic Supply Contract or Deemed Contract is for a Time of Use Tariff, the Charges for the Supply of Electricity:

(i) include a single Standing Charge;

(ii) include Time of Use Rates; and

(iii) do not include any other Unit Rate or Unit Rates;

© without prejudice to the Tariff Comparison Rate, when the licensee or any Representative displays or communicates the Charges for the Supply of Electricity in any form each of the following are separately identified from each other and any other charges:

(i) a Standing Charge;

(ii) the Unit Rate or, where applicable, Time of Use Rates.

 

SLC 22.5 Information to be provided in contract/ terms and conditions.

 

22.5 A Domestic Supply Contract or a Deemed Contract with a Domestic Customer entered into or negotiated on or after the day after the day on which the Electricity and Gas (Internal Markets) Regulations 2011 are made must include:

(a) the identity and address of the licensee;

(b) the services provided, including any maintenance services provided, and any service quality levels that are to be met;

© if a connection is required, when that connection will take place;

(d) the means by which up to date information on all applicable tariffs and maintenance charges may be obtained;

(e) any conditions for renewal of the Domestic Supply Contract;

 

(f) any compensation and refund arrangements which apply if contracted quality service levels are not met, including inaccurate and delayed billing; and

(g) information concerning the Domestic Customer’s rights as regards the means of dispute settlement available to them in the event of a dispute with the licensee including how dispute resolution procedures can be initiated.

 

Go around every supplier they will give you different answers because it is not a justifiable charge and I challenge anybody with reference to domestic contract( Please Note the words) to justify such charges.

 

In the first instance they have repudiated the contract by not meeting their obligations on maintenance . So you have a genuine dispute to start from.

They only leaves them the option of suing you. The will not do this for £100.00 but the need to prove the comply with the law in the first instance. Many do not.

 

I am here is you need to come back

Stevie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again Stevie.

 

I had a call from British Gas this afternoon. I have arranged to have the meter removed. The lady I spoke to was very polite and helpful. She said she would arrange with her manager to have all outstanding charges written off. She actually said, "This situation has gone on for far too long"! I asked for everything to be put in writing so we'll see.

 

Thank you again to everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can confirm when all promised has happened OldDebt and we will mark your thread as resolved...well done.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad this has moved towards a conclusion for you, and just wish I'd seen your thread earlier.

 

In addition to what Stevie has said, if no gas has ever been used, then provided you're not on a fixed contract then standing charges aren't applicable anyway. When a deemed contract exists (ie when a supplier is the supplier of a property and you move in and on their standard rates etc) there is no contract until such time as the supply is used. This is covered in The Gas Act and the Utilities Act.

 

Just thought I'd add this for anyone who might be in a similar situation in the future and need this advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

At 12:50 of this http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03s645z, a BG customer using no gas had his £100 SC costs waived.

At 14:20 of the same, the bloke from Consumer Futures thinks guidance on deemed contracts says you shouldn't be charged SC for no energy use.

At 16:20, the MD of Ebico says switch to them if you don't use energy but want a supply as they don't levy standing charge.

 

If I'd were in your situation, I'd get someone to move in and switch to Ebico for gas (that way, the transfer can't be blocked due to outstanding debt). Once done, you can put the Equigas account in your name 26 days later.

It will cost £500+ to get your gas supply reconnected so DON'T have your meter removed.

 

Your options regarding British gas are limited. You could put in a complaint and then take it to Ombudsman services and point out the above BBC radio 4 money box episode. You must do this within 12 months of your complaint to BG.

 

Alternative is to pay the bill and the use money claim online (if you don't live in Scotland) to take BG to the small claims court. Put in a basic claim saying your not obliged to pay SC when you don't consume in the hope that BG will not contest the case. You get court fee remission if your on certain benefits. I'm pretty sure all suppliers can contractually shaft their customers over standing charges.

 

In my experience (of debt collection based on estimated use) energy companies threaten you but don't follow court action but will bully you with debt collectors and put a mark on your credit file. They won't take you to court so you won't be able to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...