Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome finance secured loan help needed **WON CHARGE REMOVED


baggies2016
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2777 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also, i have gone through the charges, they total 3.7K including compound interest.

 

If they did refund them still leaves me just under 10K outstanding, better than 13.2K but they are still making a killing with interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just to update my thread.

 

I sent Welcome another complaint about my account,

I listed the 4k of charges and complained of irresponsible lending on the first re-write (the re-write I was aware of) on the basis that they shouldn't have increased my credit when I had been missing payments.

 

The balance on my secured account is just under 14K,

I also had an HP agreement with added PPI, charges etc with a balance of 16K.

They cannot supply CCA's for either account.

 

In my letter I made a Goodwill offer of 4K to clear both accounts and the removal of the secured Charge.

 

I had a letter refusing the grounds of the complaint but accepting the offer providing I sign to say that I will not claim PPI or charges in the future.

 

I made certain the short settlement agreement contained written evidence that they would remove the charge.

 

I had to speak to them a few times to get the wording right as they would send it over with a very vague terminology.

 

I must say that having dealt with Welcome for many years I was shocked,

they really seemed to want to cooperate to get this sorted and were actually very nice

 

. They put in writing everything I requested.

 

Paid the 4k and within days Land registry have removed the charge,

Welcome must have done this electronically.

 

I might have been able to have challenged this without paying 4K but I can now sell my house and get on with my life.

 

Big thanks to DX and good luck Cruz..........

 

Ps must be stoklholm syndrome for me to say they was being nice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an excellent result.

 

How did you word it did you put much in the letter so I got some pointers to use??

 

I'm probably going to have to add to it as looks like it was rewrite after rewrite.

 

There's a lot more outstanding on last loan it was for almost 30 grand and with interest over 300 months meant in total paid would be 69000.

 

Settlement figure was around 25 grand.

 

Dx has kindly totalled up ppi and its £2505.85 with £2746.14 to come off loan outstanding charge is dated 2 years prior to loan agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this is great

I had via in house contacts heard they had done this for 1000's

And subsequently saw on here lots had simply seen their LR files wiped

Was not sure it was still something on the table

 

Cruz off you go now your turn

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just drafted a standard letter, I stated that I would wait 14 days then I would go on moneyclaim and start county court action. I also said that I wanted to avoid another FOS complaint and it was better for us both to avoid the costs of court.

 

 

14 days passed and I had no response, I phoned them to clarify if it was accepted or rejected and stated that I wouldn't discuss anything other than this. They said it was with the short settlement team and the woman was on holiday. They told me to email the letter to [email protected]. Within 24 hours I had settlement approved just had to get the wording right.

 

 

Maybe the KPI's for the staff have been to recover cash at an higher rate....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...