Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell pre-legal assessment letter Cap1 debt


Fionaj6131
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have a £768.23 debt originally from Cap One credit card.

 

 

Stopped paying when I lost my job.

 

 

This has been sold to Lowells who have been sending me the usual threatening letters, indispersed with discount offers for a few months now.

 

They have now sent a 'Pre-legal Assessment' letter which informs me that they know I am working, a home owner, and service other debts.

 

 

They also state that they are willing to accept whatever amount I suggest for a 'repayment plan' but would go down the Court route if they do not hear from me.

 

Advice on how best to proceed would be great as am about to be made redundant in March.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a £768.23 debt originally from Cap One credit card. Stopped paying when I lost my job. This has been sold to Lowells who have been sending me the usual threatening letters, indispersed with discount offers for a few months now.

 

They have now sent a 'Pre-legal Assessment' letter which informs me that they know I am working, a home owner, and service other debts. They also state that they are willing to accept whatever amount I suggest for a 'repayment plan' but would go down the Court route if they do not hear from me.

 

Advice on how best to proceed would be great as am about to be made redundant in March.

 

Thank you.

 

When did you take out this Cap1 account originally ?

 

When did you stop paying it ?

 

Do you have other debts ?

 

What is the total of the debts you have ?

 

Do you have a debt management arrangement to pay other debts ?

 

Lowell don't normally issue court claims themselves. It gets farmed out to legal debt collection firms who write out to people before issuing claims.

 

Can you answer the above and we might be able to offer some advice.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your life and family come first - well before the needs of Lowell. Do not enter any discussion at this stage and certainly do NOT phone them. This is a standard threatogram.

 

Can you give us more history? When was the card taken out and when did you stop paying? Have you paid anything during that time or have you acknowledged in writing whilst in default that you accept responsibility for the debt?

 

Personally I would wait for now and see what happens next. Most probably there will be a series of further letters, maybe offering a discount, but I would still hold off until you get a Letter Before Claim. That is the time to CCA Lowell to see whether they are even able to enforce the debt.

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god not the pre school assessment letter from lowells

 

 

was it the one in red crayon

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh god not the pre school assessment letter from lowells

 

 

was it the one in red crayon

 

Considering Ive just woken up and this is the first thing I read.... Jesus this made me laugh... :p

OP... This will get farmed out to one of Lowells potential solicitors, however Lowell also have their own legal team now so could be interesting. I personally would send a CCA request now to see if they have the legal documents before it hits court... But Others may advise differently.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona

 

Come back for more advice about this. Remember that if you have debts which you are not paying which exceed £5k, then certain companies will look at bankruptcy down the line as a possibility, if they note you own property. They should go down the CCJ route first and you would get opportunity to defend or pay. This does not appear to be on the horizon yet.

 

I only mention this, as i saw your thread about another catalogue debt exceeding £5k.

 

Armed with more information, we would be better placed to offer advice. Don't bury your head, until you get a court claim through the post.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona

 

Come back for more advice about this. Remember that if you have debts which you are not paying which exceed £5k, then certain companies will look at bankruptcy down the line as a possibility, if they note you own property. They should go down the CCJ route first and you would get opportunity to defend or pay. This does not appear to be on the horizon yet.

 

I only mention this, as i saw your thread about another catalogue debt exceeding £5k.

 

Armed with more information, we would be better placed to offer advice. Don't bury your head, until you get a court claim through the post.

 

One other thing Fiona... Lowell have been slapped on the wrists forum issuing Statutory Demands like raindrops...

 

They will issue if they feel they can chance it...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other debt is with another DCA, but both have threatened bankruptcy to debtors. Lowell have previously bought other debts, so they have enough to go for bankruptcy.

 

But from what i have seen, most companies now seem to follow the FCA rules and will go down the CCJ route first.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...