Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Journo Russell Scott has been looking at people who sold PPE to the Johnson government. https://twitter.com/RussellScott1/status/1780686322908487787  
    • It is important that you do the reading about this subject in the sub- forum. It's not complicated but you need to be in control and I don't think you are. For instance, much of the information you need and also the case transcripts that you're looking for are in the fixed topics at the top of this sub- forum but clearly you didn't know that. You will gain in confidence if you do the reading. Particularly as it now looks as if the mediation has not worked because EVRi have stayed you up and so you may now be going to trial. You need to understand thoroughly what you are doing. We will help you and you will find our support is unstinting but you have to do your part. Please spend a lot of time reading the stories on the sub- forum especially the pinned posts at the top of the sub- forum and then start preparing your court bundle. We have instructions here for everything
    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell..and disputed Tmobile debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I've been a member here for a few years since the original debt caused me problems, but I cant remember my log in details.

 

At the end of 2011 I had a Tmobile phone stolen and £340 rung up before I realized and reported it missing.

 

During the phone call to discuss the bill with their complaints dept,

I was offered a goodwill gesture of £170 *IF* I took out a new 18 month contract at a higher monthly rate than I had been paying.

 

I asked for some time to think about it and took an email address (as at that point I wanted to get things in writing).

 

After I had done some research, probably here, I discovered that I was liable so I emailed Tmobile to accept the offer.

Tmobile emailed back saying they had withdrawn the offer as it was a "one time only telephone offer",

so I would have to pay in full (I still have both emails)

I thought "then" and cancelled the direct debit.

 

A few months later Sigma Red started writing to me about the debt, and marked my credit file with a default against them not Tmobile.

 

As I have a few debts in good standing ,

having this one default hasn't really caused me problems

and I am happy not to pay Tmobile when they are acting as "fences",

 

but I have been looking forward to having the default drop off my file for personal satisfaction reasons.

 

So that's the history.

 

I have just started to receive letters from these Lowell people saying that my account was "sold to them by Tmobile".

 

firstly, should the "sigma Red" debt now show as paid on my file?

 

Secondly, will Lowell enter a new debt?

I understand I can make them remove it but still it will be a PITA.

 

thirdly, as this debt is 18 months from being SB'd what are my options in dealing with Lowell?

 

is there any realistic chance of a CCJ?

 

Many thanks for your time.

Edited by old shaver
Link to post
Share on other sites

sigma would not have entered the defaultTM would have.

 

lowells can do what they like

as long as they don't change the original defaulted date.

 

pers i'd be getting an sar off to TM now.

get all the info,

and p'haps dispute the debt.

 

this does not sound fair to me.

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is Sigma Red a sub of Tmobile?

 

Company: SIGMA RED Started: 28/02/08 Account Updated to 17/05/15

COMMUNICATIONS

Default Date:10/09/11

Account Type: Current Balance:£340 Default Balance:£340

 

The above is copypasta direct from my file. Having read a few threads here before I posted, I thought it was odd.

 

With only 18 months before the SB date, would contacting Tmobile reset the clock on that?

 

I'm happy to redact and paste in the original emails but they would take a lot of space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no sigma red is a DCA..

 

 

sar tmobile

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If sigma has it then its 100% UE.

 

Also:

At the end of 2011 I had a Tmobile phone stolen and £340 rung up before I realized and reported it missing.

 

I was offered a goodwill gestureicon of £170 *IF* I took out a new 18 month contract at a higher monthly rate than I had been paying.

 

You got Conned. Likely by a sales pitch so the operator got comission off it as he couldnt be bothered to put you through to the fraud department.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. They only deal in bad debts that nobody else will touch

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you pay it then?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"why did you pay it then?" umm I didnt.

 

I think my post was edited by a mod for some of the daddies special words I used in my hypothetical response to Tmobile.

 

I think I can see the problem.

 

Tmobile offered me a "goodwill gesture" of paying half the original bill if I took out the extended and more expensive contract.

 

I asked that we carry on correspondence in writing, and for some time to research the contract I was being offered (and to research my liability).

 

When I contacted them to say that I would take up the "goodwill offer" they withdrew it, so basically they made a "bad will offer" which I took to be a go forth an multipy from them, so I did.

Edited by old shaver
Link to post
Share on other sites

It changes words. Not the meaning. Your post implies you got tricked into paying something you did not owe, and you added conditions or they did to the payment.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is somebody actually going to help me with the actual issue here , or even put it back into the right subforum or are we all going to praise ourselves on our reading comprehension?

 

Its a truth oft repeated, the best way to get help on an internet forum isnt to ask a question but to post the wrong answer and wait for everybody to correct you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 2 is your answer.

 

as for a CCJ we've not got a crystal ball sadly

 

however a search of cag with say the words claimform mobile debt

 

should reveal that the majority of mobile claims by fleecing dca's where there is a dispute

[like yous say - unfair call charges relating to a phone theft]

result to nothing

 

as for the paid bit..

 

I guess you are reading the TMobile CRa file entry - that says £0

but the lowells one say the true bal?

so you though it had been written off?

 

that's what happens on a cra file when a debt is sold on.

as long as the dca doesn't charge the defaulted date, theres sadly nowt of worth to wave arms about.

 

on the defaults 6th birthday

the whole account will vanish.

 

as in post 2

if you want to gather evidence in case of a claimform

it would be in your interest to send an sar to TMobile now

 

then you will have the written proof to counter their poss court claim.

 

nothing more you can do sadly.

 

 

the thread is in the right forum

as the original debt was a mobile phone account that went bad

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi all,

I had a previous success but as Lowell wouldnt let sleeping dogs lie,

I dont see why I should.

 

I received a letter from Lowells during my county court fun and games with them,

the relevant parts being...

 

"due to non payment the account defaulted on 10/09/11 and was registered on your credit file.

The last payment toward your account was for £13 on 10/1/11"

 

The account was for a mobile that was stolen and charges to premium lines in Algeria rung up.

 

I got into an email correspondence with T-mobile

where I was originally offered a reduced payment deal but when I accepted it ,

it was withdrawn and the full balance demanded.

I still have the emails, the latest dated 10/2/11.

 

I consider this to be SB from tomorrow.

I also consider the account to have been "in dispute" when it was sold to the first of a chain of recovery companies.

 

I consider the default date to be 1 month after the final payment ie: 10/2/11 and therefor it should clear from my file tomorrow.

 

Lowells are the holders of the default and should make all this happen for me.

What say you?

 

on a side issue, the default amount on my file is £100 more than the original default figure and I assume this is made up of charges?

 

This cant be right shirley!?

Edited by old shaver
Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happened with the County Court Claim ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if the claim was discontinued ...then the clock never stopped...the difference in the debt amount may be the court fees for issuing the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming it is ..which you would have to check by getting hold of a statement..shouldn't be showing anywhere...they discontinued..therefore they stand the wasted cost.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its showing as £450 on the "top line" of the default, but £350 against all the little red "D"s .

 

 

I tried posting up a snip/screen shot but I cant get it to work :( S

 

 

do I send the letter with the quoted info to the credit agencies or do I demend Lowell contacts them and ammends the record?

 

 

I might even be persuaded to give them a very small amount in full and final settlement.

10% of what they paid the previous DCA,

who probably paid T-mobile 10%,

should cover Lowells costs. a

bout £3.50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRAs wont amend it...only Lowell can alter the amount....should they wish to.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmm, and are there any tactics and strategies to get them to do this?

 

 

I could give it until Sept when it drops off anyway which was my original plan.

 

 

However, I'd been working on improving my credit when Lowells dropped the court claim on me so now I'm up for the fight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much you can do (except a notoce of correction on the amount)..inflated or not...wont go until its sixth aniversary

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for full history

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for full history

 

 

dx

 

Cheers. I'm guessing that if I write to Lowells and request they update my credit file, they're not just going to see the light and realize they have been walking the crooked path all this time. Is there anything I can quote that might remind them they have a duty to keep the files in order? BTW, I got a noodle update today that pushed my credit score from fair to poor, the only difference being the Feb default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...