Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Could Kwik Fit have sabotaged my brakes?


grope
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Fiat 500 failed its MOT today at Kwik Fit, East Kilbride.

 

 

Before the test, the car drove normally with no apparent problems.

Unfortunately, it failed the MOT due to "rear brake binding offside" (drum brake).

KF offered to carry out a 'free brake check' to see what needed to be done but I didn't have time so drove the car home.

 

 

I immediately noticed a striking difference in the car's performance.

The brake was binding so much that I kept stalling the car when moving off and the problem was also noticeable at speed.

When I got home, the affected wheel was hot, whereas the other three were normal.

 

To me, it seems like a huge coincidence that a problem like this should suddenly appear.

My immediate thought was that someone at Kwik Fit must have tampered with the brake either deliberately or accidently, causing it to permanently bind.

Is this possible?

The wheel does not seem to have been removed.

The handbrake seems to work normally with no difference in the lever's resistance.

 

Fortunately, I do not need use the car for the next few days and I've got more than a week before the old MOT expires.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Should I complain to KF Head office?

 

 

I'm sure if I took the car back for a 'free brake check'

they would find that various parts need to be replaced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

IF they have then it is a serious matter but the proving is another matter. If you have drum brakes on the rear then these may be adjustable to bind the brakes. If disc brakes then I can't see this happening.

 

I would suggest that you go to another garage and get an inspection. If there is a problem (not one caused by KF) then for pities sake, don't let KF do the repairs. They have had some bad press on CAG in recent times

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Silverfox,

Yes the brake in question is a drum brake. I know that you could adjust a handbrake cable to make both rear brakes bind, but can you do something to just make one of the brakes bind (without dismantling the drum)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some cars (not many now) have the ability to adjust each brake so that it binds. This is either by an external screw or through a hole in the rear of the drum. If you, or a mechanic can adjust the binding drum so that it stops binding then that would suggest tampering.

 

A lot of cars have self adjusting rear brakes which are adjusted by putting the handbrake on. If the handbrake has been pulled too high, this can adjust a brake drum so that iy binds which is mainly why I say get it checked by an independant mechanic.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...