Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have just managed to pay off one lot of council tax to a Marston bailiff, and he will shortly chasing me for another £3k.

 

He did have a long wait before to get paid including six fruitless attendances.

 

He is a nasty bitter individual, which I assume is par for the course, and after our initial telephone conversation I will only contact him by text, so I have a log of everything.

 

In our exchange of texts I have always remained polite, despite being called a liar by him on several occasions.

 

Now, the notice they have sent is unlike the last one. It does not ask me to contact their office but to ring my favourite bailiff by Saturday 14th with payment of proposals.

 

I had intended to text him tomorrow to offer £250 a month for 12 months with the last payment slightly more to clear the full balance. These would be paid on the 29th of each month as next year is a leap year.

 

He has mentioned he will not text me again. Can he insist on me calling him - he does make my skin crawl?

 

Can he also refuse/ignore my offer allowing the debt to default and add another few hundred on top for this.

 

Thanks for any advice,

 

 

Sara

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how much you owe as confirmed from the Council?

Do you know how many Liability Orders they have against you?

Is the letter from Marstons a Notice of Enforcement?

Have you asked for a breakdown of what you have been charged previously?

 

The rules changed in April 2014 and what happens & charges can be found @ http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?453292-Bailiff-enforcement-A-Simple-Guide-to-the-Taking-Control-of-Goods-Regulations%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom, in answer to your points:

 

Do you know how much you owe as confirmed from the Council?

- the amount appears correct but no breakdown given. just the total

 

Do you know how many Liability Orders they have against you? -

just this one

 

Is the letter from Marstons a Notice of Enforcement?

yes it is-

 

Have you asked for a breakdown of what you have been charged previously?

I checked and all were correct

 

Thank you for the link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at your Notice of Enforcement can you tell me:

When it was dated?

When it was posted - if there is a frank on the envelope?

How it was sent & if posted what class was used - !st, 2nd or via a 3rd party?

When you received it?

The date & time they have given you to make contact?

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom, in answer to your points:

 

Do you know how much you owe as confirmed from the Council?

- the amount appears correct but no breakdown given. just the total

 

 

The amount quoted will usually include the £75 Compliance Fee.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For making an arrangement to pay the Bailiffs are usually under instruction from the Council to collect within certain time limits, usually 3 or 6 months & before the end of the financial year. If your plan appears to last longer because you owe a lot and/or are having difficulty over payments which may be unrealistic the you should ask for help from your local Councillor(s).

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find he may well turn down any proposal you may have as neither he nor his company would make much out of the £75 fee charged. If they then go to the next stage and he is able to make a visit then he can add £235 to the debt and this is a more attractive proposition for him. Of course what he is hoping for is that you will allow him access to your home - a seriously bad idea - whereby he can take control of your possessions. Don't forget a much more attractive idea is that he hopes you may have a nice shiny motor outside he could seize, so if you have a car it would be best to place it under lock & key, park about 10 minutes away or park it on private land (with the owners consent). Providing he cannot make a Controlled Goods Agreement with you he is basically stuffed as he can charge no more fees. He will attend at different times of day - 6-30 in the morning is a favourite and will knock very loudly for up to 30 minutes or so.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For making an arrangement to pay the Bailiffs are usually under instruction from the Council to collect within certain time limits, usually 3 or 6 months & before the end of the financial year. If your plan appears to last longer because you owe a lot and/or are having difficulty over payments which may be unrealistic the you should ask for help from your local Councillor(s).

 

The arrangement with the council was for 12 months x £250 that should have started on 25 September, so only a little longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice was dated 2 November and received on the Wednesday 4th. I am instructed to make payment or agree a plan by Sunday which appears strange and suspicious!! 13 days not 14?? Seems odd to pick the one day he is not working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find he may well turn down any proposal you may have as neither he nor his company would make much out of the £75 fee charged. If they then go to the next stage and he is able to make a visit then he can add £235 to the debt and this is a more attractive proposition for him. Of course what he is hoping for is that you will allow him access to your home - a seriously bad idea - whereby he can take control of your possessions. Don't forget a much more attractive idea is that he hopes you may have a nice shiny motor outside he could seize, so if you have a car it would be best to place it under lock & key, park about 10 minutes away or park it on private land (with the owners consent). Providing he cannot make a Controlled Goods Agreement with you he is basically stuffed as he can charge no more fees. He will attend at different times of day - 6-30 in the morning is a favourite and will knock very loudly for up to 30 minutes or so.

 

I can see that but if I offer to clear the debt in the same time the council agreed surely it is not acting ethically to refuse this in order to increase your fee and he would risk the loss of his licence? or am I bring unrealistic?

 

He knows he would never gain access to the property and even if he did it wouldn't reach £500 and cars are old bangers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice was dated 2 November and received on the Wednesday 4th. I am instructed to make payment or agree a plan by Sunday which appears strange and suspicious!! 13 days not 14?? Seems odd to pick the one day he is not working.

 

7 clear days it needs to be.

 

EA's do work Sundays. Its a very productive day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ANPR is good at finding cars that have new owners who owe squat.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does a bailiff have to follow a Code of Conduct?

 

If I make a perfectly reasonable offer in line with that agreed with the local authority creditor (although broken), can they refuse it in order to claim another £235?

 

Can this be appealed against? Should I ask my local councillor as suggested by ploddertom - and what is the best way to make contact - phone or email?

 

Any point in contacting the council - they previously claimed it was "outside their hands"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To an extent yes.

 

No, that agreement no longer stand and may not fir within the timescales set by the la for recovery.

 

You can ask the council to take it back bit they may not do.

 

Others may be able to advise you more on local councillor options.

 

Thanks Grumpy,

 

I appreciate that agreement was in the past and gone. It's just that Tom mentioned the council may require settlement to be made in the financial year, but they were happy to extend this to September 2016.

 

What I should ask is if a "reasonable" offer is made and he refuses this, another £235 can be added. Can this £235 charge be appealed against on the grounds that he was being unreasonable about my offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice was dated 2 November and received on the Wednesday 4th. I am instructed to make payment or agree a plan by Sunday which appears strange and suspicious!! 13 days not 14?? Seems odd to pick the one day he is not working.

 

It is not strange at all. The company should give you 7 clear days and Marston's appear to be allowing you a more generous period of time.

 

If you wish to avoid a personal visit and the debt increasing by £235 then you need to contact the company today.

 

I appreciate what you say about the council having previously agreed to accept settlement of the debt by way of monthly payments of £250 spread over 12 month. The fact is that you did not adhere to their proposal so that debt has been sent to Marstons and accordingly, they can insist on full payment immediately or accept a payment proposal. Whether they are willing to accept such a generous repayment proposal as the council will remain to be seen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bailiffadvice.

 

When the councils direct debit hit my account their were not funds to cover it and I thought it would be represented but never was, but as you say this is gone.

 

The Notice, which was their first point of contact, says to contact the bailiff directly. If I ring the office I am pretty sure they will just refer me to him and he is not the most pleasant person to deal with plus he will want to visit and charge the £235.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bailiffadvice.

 

When the councils direct debit hit my account their were not funds to cover it and I thought it would be represented but never was, but as you say this is gone.

 

The Notice, which was their first point of contact, says to contact the bailiff directly. If I ring the office I am pretty sure they will just refer me to him and he is not the most pleasant person to deal with plus he will want to visit and charge the £235.

 

I am assuming from your posts that you are still within the 'compliance stage' (this is the period between the date of the Notice of Enforcement and the 'cut off' date to make payment. If so, then a payment arrangement should be made with the enforcement AGENCY and not the enforcement AGENT.

 

Please post back once you have spoken to the enforcement company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...