Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Uncle Buck & First Stop Recoveries Ltd CLAIM FORM ***Claim Struck Out***


BurgessFan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

maybe in the same boat as a lot of people who have put their head in the sand :-(

 

I had a payday loan with Uncle Buck which I did not pay when due on the 30th of January 2015 for £202.43..

 

I have today received court papers for £391.43 plus the £35 court costs.

 

Is this legally allowable? Do I have any arguments here or am i up the proverbial without a paddle?

 

V v limited details in paper form but will scan these and upload when at work on Monday.

are there relevant details I should ask !st Stop and/or Uncle Buck for?

What should I do with the papers recieved from the court?

 

Any advice appreciated!

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am amazed a pay day loan company now goes to court

 

They usually flog the debt to Motormouth

 

They are not a judges favourite claimant due to unethacal business practices

 

How was this £391.43 made up

 

£202.43 seems an odd sum as the original loan amount

 

Did you do a rollover??

Edited by obiter dictum
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I've moved your thread to the financial legal forum for further advice. I've left a link for you to follow from the Welcome forum.

 

Could you have a read of this forum stikky and post up the information requested please? This will help the guys to advise you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am amazed a pay day loan company now goes to court

 

They usually flog the debt to Motormouth

 

They are not a judges favourite claimant due to unethacal business practices

 

How was this £391.43 made up

 

£202.43 seems an odd sum as the original loan amount

 

Did you do a roll over??

 

How was the 391 made up? One thing I intend to find out . I presume I send an SAR or CCA..but who to?

 

Claim details , v "brief" shall we say :-)

 

there was indeed a rollover, 1.

 

taken out 04/12/14

 

150.00 credit

total amount payable 22/12 202.43

rolled over 17/12 with due date 30/01 of 202.43

this amount was not paid by myself on this date

 

it would appear after that the charges/ interest just kept on coming :-S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I've moved your thread to the financial legal forum for further advice. I've left a link for you to follow from the Welcome forum.

 

Could you have a read of this forum stikky and post up the information requested please? This will help the guys to advise you.

 

 

 

HB

 

thanks Honeybee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? 1st stop recoveries Ltd

Date of issue – . 2nd Nov 2015

submit defence = 4th of December?? by 4pm

 

What is the claim for –

 

1st stop recoveries claim this amount in respect of an unpaid load funded by Uncle Buck Ltd

The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

1st Stop recoveries purchased this debt from Uncle Buck

and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise the defendant

has failed to respond to any correspondance or communciation from the claimant

thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assissting the defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion

 

What is the value of the claim? 391.43 + court fee = 426.43

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? payday loan

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? from my memory only..no

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? from my memory only..no

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not a year...yet but no notice

Why did you cease payments? Payment difficulty

What was the date of your last payment? rolled over 17/12/2014

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no but unsure why 200 odd has gone to 390!

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

please note the corrected defence filing date

 

 

have you ack'd the claim - defend all - on the mcol website yet?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it done no harm in doing it now

 

 

defend all

leave juris unticked

 

 

and get a CCA request running to the claimant

£1PO leave it blank don't sign anything

 

 

and get a CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the library

running to the solicitors named - who are?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont get me wrong but couldn't one piece of defense be used, such as the below;

 

(This loan was taken AFTER the change by the FCA)

 

Martin Wheatley, the FCA's chief executive officer, said:

 

'I am confident that the new rules strike the right balance for firms and consumers. If the price cap was any lower, then we risk not having a viable market, any higher and there would not be adequate protection for borrowers.

 

'For people who struggle to repay, we believe the new rules will put an end to spiraling payday debts. For most of the borrowers who do pay back their loans on time, the cap on fees and charges represents substantial protections.'

 

The FCA published its proposals for a payday loan price cap in July. The price cap structure and levels remain unchanged following the consultation. These are:

 

Initial cost cap of 0.8% per day - Lowers the cost for most borrowers. For all high-cost short-term credit loans, interest and fees must not exceed 0.8% per day of the amount borrowed.

Fixed default fees capped at £15 - Protects borrowers struggling to repay. If borrowers do not repay their loans on time, default charges must not exceed £15. Interest on unpaid balances and default charges must not exceed the initial rate.

Total cost cap of 100% - Protects borrowers from escalating debts. Borrowers must never have to pay back more in fees and interest than the amount borrowed.

From 2 January 2015, no borrower will ever pay back more than twice what they borrowed, and someone taking out a loan for 30 days and repaying on time will not pay more than £24 in fees and charges per £100 borrowed.

 

 

Now that they have added court fees, It means its taken it above the rules set out by FCA.... Also how much did they charge for the default?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it done no harm in doing it now

 

 

defend all

leave juris unticked

 

 

and get a CCA request running to the claimant

£1PO leave it blank don't sign anything

 

 

and get a CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the library

running to the solicitors named - who are?

 

 

Ok so first part for me as much as anyone else :-)

 

Ack done on line, disputing all

tonights job is to find the CCA template and send off to 1st Stop

 

Re comments

 

and get a CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the library

running to the solicitors named - who are?

 

what does this mean? sorry I'm being dumb DX

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request

 

Then go get the CPR as advised

 

That goes to the claimants solicitors...who are?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR means Civil Procedure Rules - i.e. the rules upon which civil claims are based and administered in accordance with. That's my non-expert definition.

 

31.14 refers to disclosure and inspection of documents - https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31

 

The normal advice on here is to make a request you send to the claimant for supply of documents relating to the particulars of the claim. In most of these claims, the claimant won't comply with the request and there is no legal obligation to, but it's useful to refer to the fact you've requested said documents in your defence and also later in your witness statements. It shows the claimant you mean business, but also shows the court that you've made reasonable and proactive attempts to resolve the matter.

 

Sham

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX, no solicitors quoted , only the DCA, First Stop

 

So they are using in house litigation team.. send it to the DCA

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

done

 

so whats next on the timelines?

 

Ok, so you have sent away for documents that you need - you have acknowledged the claim online. The next thing will be your defence which you need to submit by 4th December. You have some time in hand so you might want to have a look at other threads and consider what you want to say.

 

First of all, when you took out the loan did they do any credit checks ? You appear to have rolled the loan over, was this because you were struggling financially at that time ? Did you ask to roll over or did they suggest you rolled over ?

 

This loan appears to have been taken out after the FCA put in place the new lending criteria. Did they abide by this or have they lent to you irresponsibly ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I notice you say you didn't communicate that you were struggling financially - how easy does this company make it for people to contact them ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so you have sent away for documents that you need - you have acknowledged the claim online. The next thing will be your defence which you need to submit by 4th December. You have some time in hand so you might want to have a look at other threads and consider what you want to say.

 

First of all, when you took out the loan did they do any credit checks ?
how can i check this?

 

You appear to have rolled the loan over, was this because you were struggling financially at that time ? Did you ask to roll over or did they suggest you rolled over ?
i was, it was just before xmas. it was an option within an email from them

 

This loan appears to have been taken out after the FCA put in place the new lending criteria. Did they abide by this or have they lent to you irresponsibly ?

will the above help this?

 

as well as the above, is it legally fair to double the amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont get me wrong but couldn't one piece of defense be used, such as the below;

 

(This loan was taken AFTER the change by the FCA)

 

 

 

Now that they have added court fees, It means its taken it above the rules set out by FCA.... Also how much did they charge for the default?

 

 

Definitely find this interesting, the loan amount which was "rolled over was " £150 so even before court fees its over the 100% I believe

 

 

That's before I start looking as whether their lending was "responsible" ( ie Credit checks done etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so got the documents from 1st stop in the post. Whats the best next step here guys n gals?

 

thanks

 

included in this is a notice of

  • Notice of assignment ( presume copy of original )
  • default notice ( oddly some 8 months after the payday loan was due)
  • 2 statement of accounts, which I don't quite understand both TO the same date but from different dates, with different amounts on them
  • The agreement from 04/12/2014

 

Have blanked all details ( i think , but mods feel free to shout if I havent).

 

Anyone free to take a look?

 

Have just over a week but want to get Ducks lined up for my defense.

 

thanks all!

 

Edit..default notice removed..number showing...DX..siteteam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have blanked all details ( i think , but mods feel free to shout if I havent).

 

Anyone free to take a look?

 

Have just over a week but want to get Ducks lined up for my defense.

 

thanks all!

 

Edit..default notice removed..number showing...DX..siteteam

 

Thanks DX, knew I'd miss something :-s

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...