Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Uncle Buck & First Stop Recoveries Ltd CLAIM FORM ***Claim Struck Out***


BurgessFan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2593 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just like the old days of Trevor mann

they allow their name to be used to chase CCJ's

 

 

don't even think they are solicitors

just a cleverly named DCA

but they aren't registered with the FCA nor hold a CCL

those need checking.

 

 

I wold be very interesting to phone them up and record the call

I bet the FCA/ICO/FOS would be very interested to hear it

I bet they make all kinds of threats on the phone

that they cannot and will not do in writing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

cant find them registered anywhere

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ist Stop Recoveries Ltd of Unit 16, Thompson Rd, Whitehills, Business Park, Blackpool FY4 5PN changed their name to Clear Recoveries in May 2016 telephone 01253 603951 (the Legal one ends 55) they are part of Clear Companies Group registered at Unit 16 also.

 

You must report to FCA immediately, this is a standard email which is probably used widely by these clowns.

 

FOS will only take a complaint after you have sent a letter to the company and waited 8 weeks.

 

 

I would write to Clear Companies Group and point out out that action was started by !st Stop

but you have now been contacted by TM (same address) and threatened Send by Recorded post if possible and attach copy of email.

 

 

Be careful as your case was struck out not discontinued but they did not try and challenge it at the time, not sure if they can start again, others will know. They are unlikely to reply, they don't seem to like letters. Keep copy of letter and email.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - I am not sure of the rules, I think they would have to bring a new Claim but TM didn't own your alleged debt did they? I would still complain, address to TM, and ask why you are receiving nasty emails from someone you have never heard of? Then go to FOS unless you get a satisfactory response.

 

Still worth complaining particularly to FCA - this lot are looking very suspicious. MotorMile are another Payday loan buyer recently sanctioned by FCA for some dubious practices, suspect we have another one. The more notification FCA get of odd behaviour from a particular address - the more likely they are to investigate.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

FCA replied saying TM legal services are not appearing on the FCA register which suggests they are not regulated by them...

 

Still the emails continue from them saying they have a ccj and they are progressing & to call them :-S

 

Only body they have on their mails is the ICO...

 

ANy ideas in getting the mails to stop?

Checked again with the court by phone and online. Still struck out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Full mail ( redacted names / amounts)

 

 

Dear XXXX,

 

Agreement Number – XXXX

Outstanding Balance – £XXXX

 

As you are aware, we are now managing the above County Court Judgment. We are now looking to continue with further enforcement action.

 

If you receive a County Court Judgment and do not keep to the terms set out, we can ask the court to enforce the County Court Judgment. There are several ways we can enforce the County Court Judgment:

 

 

  • Bailiff action
  • Attachment of earnings
  • Charging order

 

Bailiff Action

We can apply to county court for a bailiff to collect the County Court Judgment. If the court grants permission, it will issue a Warrant of Execution.

 

This gives the bailiff the power to visit your home or business to collect the money you owe, or to seize goods that could be sold to repay the County Court Judgment. You can ask the court to suspend the Warrant and let you pay back the money at an affordable rate.

 

Attachment of Earnings

An Attachment of Earnings Order asks for the money owed to be deducted by your employer from your wages.

 

Charging Order

If you own a property (either with a mortgage or outright) we can ask for a Charging Order to be secured on it.

 

To avoid the above course of action(s), we are willing to accept a one of settlement on your account of £xxx.xx which needs to be paid on or before the xx xxxx 2017. Once this amount has been paid we will inform the courts to this effect and get the County Court Judgment marked as satisfied on your credit report.

 

If you are unable to pay the settlement, we are willing to accept your full balance of £xxx.xx to be paid over 12 monthly instalments (£xx.xx each month) with your first payment being paid on or before xx xxxxx2017. Alternatively, if you are unable to do either, we invite you to put forward your payment proposal.

 

Please contact us by no later than close of business (6:00pm) on the xx xxxxx 2017 on 01253 523460 (Option 2) to set up a payment arrangement on your account.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

TM Legal Services

 

Unit 16, Thompson Road

Blackpool,

Lancashire

FY4 5PN

 

01253 523460

 

?ui=2&ik=dd45ad7713&view=fimg&th=15acc5e3570887f9&attid=0.1&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ8zMpctkqhpfKDFAJ68qwbvQKyQtT1Y4k0dBipE04mHFFBFhg1_ODre68QZP_Rwrq2rF6RHan9xJZdsecuyNWXP7fRCFYiyBkYDXDHnDr3XkKcs6VwBRIikJmc&sz=w726-h202&ats=1489490767082&rm=15acc5e3570887f9&zw&atsh=1

 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. You should be aware that TM Legal Services Limited reserves the right and intends to intercept and monitor incoming and outgoing e-mail correspondence. You should not therefore expect any e-mail communications to be private in nature. Calls may be recorded for training and monitoring purposes. TM Legal Services, registered in England & Wales. Company Number 10214118. Registered with the ICO under registration number ZA212742. Registered Office: Unit 16, White Hills Business Park, Thompson Road, Blackpool, Lancashire FY4 5PN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or respond (if not already) claim number xxxxxxxxx date of claim xxxxxxxx struck out date xxxxxxxxx By District Judge xxxxxxxx at County Court xxxxxxxxx.

 

Copies of this and related emails will be forwarded to FCO

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

notice they say 'manage'

not they have been substituted as the claimant

nor the acting sols for the claimant

 

either of which they must do first to the court

 

willy waving!!

 

bugger and all they can do

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...