Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, you made a bad mistake by outing yourself as the driver. But that's not fatal.  It's a case of one argument unfortunately down, but lots of other arguments still standing.  Chiefly that this is a scam site with an invisible line separating two car parks in order to entrap motorists. 1.  As LFI says, send a SAR to MET so you can get your hands on their original invoice.  Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office. 2.  About six months ago, when the tsunami of cases at this site started, lots of Caggers contacted the CEO of Starbucks  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-82463&c=Starbucks UK-General Manager  Starbucks then contacted EuroGarages which seems to be another company in their group, and which runs the Stansted branch, and which got the invoice withdrawn.  However, after one, two, 10, 20 of these cases Starbucks seemed to get fed up.  However, it's only an e-mail, and surely worth a shot.  Lay it on thick about being a regular Starbucks customer but on this occasion you found the branch closed, and it is completely unfair to be charged £100 for briefly stopping in a car park while trying to use Starbucks. The main point here though is that MET are very, very wary of starting court cases for this site.  If they don't do court there's no reason to pay them.
    • Thanks jk2054, you were indeed correct. I've received the court order requesting documents and the witness statement etc. which I will read through and begin to compile shortly.
    • Find out what these WhatsApp scams are and what to do if you receive a message from a scammerView the full article
    • You need to send Met an SAR and they will send you the original PCN .. However all their PCNs appear to be the same and as the car parks are on airport land the keeper is not liable for the debt. Only the driver is responsible. But there are other considerations which can be enough for you to win. Poorly lit signage; scam site, it's a penalty; as well as problems with the contract. So you have a lot of things going for you as well as Met are not keen to take well defended cases to Court.  
    • The brand, which runs 216 shops as well as franchised stores, is looking at ways to save cash.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide Debt issues


StageD
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone hoping to get some more wonderful help from someone that can help :)

 

My husband has received a letter from nationwide today saying they want to reduce our agreed overdraft limit on the 7th of November.

 

 

We do not have the fund available to us to do this and if they do it we will have to leave the overdraft at what it is now

and will start to (I assume) incur fines, which will quickly spiral out of control as there is little chance we'll get it to what they want any time soon.

 

I would, if the situation was better, ask family for their help in the matter,

but we already owe several hundred to my parents and we are already living mostly rent free with his parents

(who are also having money problems, so much so they could really do with us giving them more).

 

Can anyone advise me on what my options might be?

 

 

My husband also has a mental health illness that things like this certainly don't help (under treatment)

so what can I send to them so they speak to me only and not involve or worry him?

 

Many thanks to all and I'll try and answer any questions I can

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

There are lots of these letters going out at the moment.

They tried that with me they got a stern letter.

They wanted to reduce by 250.00 in one hit, they didn't get it,

but I have agreed to reduce the overdraft facility at a rate that will allow me to live and buy food and pay my bills on time.

 

Revenue services are a good place to start.

Did they give you the 21 days notice as required in their T&C's?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again, sorry I've not been responding, I havent been getting alerts to new posts it seems.

 

I'm also in talks with them trying to get them to agree to a reducing overdraft arrangement,

 

 

I'll post more tomorrow but for now I'm going to try and find where in their T&C that 21 days bit is. Is it working days?

 

 

Even if its 3 weeks from writing the letter the deadline should make it Wednesday

and they've adjusted the OD 2 days early on Monday.

I'm sure I'll be back here soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bah, looks like the T&C says

Any overdraft that we give you can be immediately reduced or withdrawn by us and all overdrafts are repayable on demand.

We will aim to give you not less than 14 days’ notice before reducing or withdrawing your overdraft or demanding repayment.

 

The person I'm emailing regarding this does not seem to be on the ball.

She forgot to attach an income and expenditure form, and seems to be under the impression that having the 250 come out of my account was fine by me

and that the reducing overdraft was to reduce it even further afterwards. Not what I said.

 

So, questions going forwards.

I will be happy to enter into an arrangement with them,

do I HAVE to fill out the Income and Expenditures form with them?

Or can I say that I am able to repay X amount a month?

 

I entered into discussions with them by writing (email) before the deadline,

and the person I'm speaking to has read into the situation incorrectly,

thus now placing me into a bad position finance wise

(they've taken away what overdraft there was still available, meaning if anything tries to come out of the account its gonna royally muck everything up),

 

 

will they have to re-evaluate whats gone on already and make things fair (ie give me a chance to arrange the reducing repayment)?

I'm asking them to return the limit to £1000 until an arrangement is in place,

am I able to do so and should they be taking note of it?

 

There probably is more I should ask or say but it's 4am, I should sleep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey again,

just wondering if anyone can help me with wording an email back to Nationwide regarding this.

 

 

I've sent them an Income and Expenditure statement stating that my income is £300 after all our outgoings except debt payments. I

 

 

f we take the Debt payments into account it leaves us with 31.50 'spare' each month

(actually less as I've miscalculated something but we can work around it in the short-term).

 

 

I've offered them £25 but they're asking for £50.

 

 

I could just bluntly say to them that their calculations are likely to leave us in problems

but does anyone have a suggestion on how to get them to take notice?

 

 

I seem to repeat myself alot with these people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How detailed was your I&E? did you include all of your expenses? Like TV licence and pet insurance? Things like this often help.

 

Having had this letter myself they wanted a significant amount I put my case forward and had this reduced to less than £50 PM.

 

Make sure they send the agreement in writing so if they fail to stick to it you can then make a formal complaint.

 

Also did you take out a credit card with them on your account? If so they may try the same with that too..

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey there,

 

 

the I&E was fairly in-depth and yes had everything like TV Licence etc listed.

 

 

I'll shoot off an email to them outlining CLEARLY that their suggestion would leave me around £20 short each month.

 

 

They don't seem to read everything I say at once, which ends up with me repeating myself a few times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers id be getting out of their and fast

 

 

get any income you have paid into a parachute account

and let them sweat.

 

 

how much of this OD is what can be deemed as 'penalty charges' for say failed DD cheques etc etc?

 

 

id also be investigating something like BCOBS and vulnerability status.

 

 

are they aware of you husbands issues, as that could well play a part here.

 

 

what is your main source of income too?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also like to say that I actually went in to the branch and spoke directly to the financial adviser face to face. I also took in copies of everything that would help.

 

In my situation it is slightly more complicated, but having the advisor read and speak to recoveries may also help. Remind Nationwide that you need to keep an emergency fund for that reason you can argue with them on this point too.

 

It could also assist you in as much as you let Nationwide know about your husbands health. It can and should help you....

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Luckily all our income goes into a separate account already, the Nationwide was our dedicated bill account.

 

 

Prior to this there were no penalty charges, except the odd one or two from years ago when the account was our only account.

However because of this I think they've charged me for 2.

 

 

Now one e-mail from a woman had said any charges would be refunded as I've been in contact.

 

 

I've yet to get the current man I'm speaking to to comment on them but I have bluntly bought them up in the latest

email to them so here's hoping I get a straight answer back.

 

As to telling them about my husbands health in what way could I see a tangible benefit?

 

 

At the moment I am writing letters in my husbands name (with his full permission,

 

 

he would rather I sort this out for us), and with how easily 'confused' these people seem to get I dont know if I want to muddy the water

with them getting confused as to who they can/are talking to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letting a creditor know there may be an issue is always a good idea.

Simply because once they know about and fail to act accordingly then you can make a complaint under bcobs.

 

They already know they have to deal with debtor's in a professional way and take all known circumstances in to account.

 

Have a read in the library section about BCOBS complaints and see how some of the template letters could help you.

 

Entering in to an arrangement to pay (AP) could see it entered into the credit file/s of the account holder credit file.

But once Nationwide know they tend to be very helpful in the long run.

 

Again this is your decision if you wish to do so.

It can only help in the long run.

 

 

In my case a particular purchase took my income below the required income level and triggered a credit check.

They tried to demand repayment in full then changed to to an amount that left me far too short to live on.

 

 

But I lodged a complaint and called in to the branch and provided proof.

They then looked at my account again and agreed that they were wrong

and then made an arrangement with me to reduce it over a longer period of time.

 

This was accepted and I think because I gave them the fuller picture.

 

I hope this helps but every account is reviewed differently....

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...