Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fedex admin charges and Control account plc DCA problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Transmitter purchase

 

On the 20/05/15 I purchased a Quad transmitter from HobbyKing for £167.18. This price included carriage by FedEx to my door.

 

On the seller web site was a page for selecting a carrier.

The default choice by the seller was FedEx and was highlighted by a button selection.

All of the carriers offered carriage at about the same price (DHL etc).

The carriage price offered by FedEx was the most competitive at $33.32

and I continued with the payment process.

 

 

At no point was I advised of any other affiliated costs or charges.

 

I paid the full amount as directed via PayPal.

I was informed that as soon as the parcel was despatched I would receive a consignment number.

The carriage cost in GBP was about £22 which I thought quite acceptable.

I was well aware at the time that an item at this price would attract import duty of about £30.

A few days later I received the parcel from Fedex.

 

 

All seemed fine until some days later I received a request for £45.75.

I thought this was a bit high for import duty.

I sent Fedex an email as I was unable to contact them by phone and enquired as to the amount.

 

I received a reply which informed me that the bill was in fact two separate amounts.

One for the duty (£33.75) and one for an amount labelled Admin.

 

I done some research on the Web and discovered that the ‘Admin’ charge was for processing the duty requirements, or there abouts.

This was news to me as I had no prior knowledge of any such cost.

 

I contacted Fedex by email and advised them that I had no intension of paying the admin charge

as I had not been informed at anytime of this fee. But I would pay the duty charge as shown.

 

I sent Fedex a cheque for £33.75 with a covering letter explaining my position again.

A month or so passed and then I received a reminder from Fedex about the outstanding admin amount.

I sent Fedex an email covering my position again.

A few months went by with no further correspondence.

 

 

I received a Payment demand from a DCA for the amount of £12 along with various frightening statements that would happen if this amount was not paid.

This has escalated to more letters and phones calls demanding the money along with the sum being demanded increasing with each contact.

 

I am at a loss as to how a company can demand money when I have never been asked to agree to the service offered.

I have signed no contract with Fedex and have not asked them to do any service for me.

 

Where does the figure of £12 come from this could be any amount at all £1200 even.

I have read some posts on this site and noticed that this admin fee has increased by over 150% in one year originally being about £5.

 

This ‘admin’ fee was not featured at the sellers web site at time of purchase.

This however has now been amended.

It now advices that there may be an admin fee on some items.

But no amount is specified.

 

Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated.

PS I have donated the £12 to this site.

Edited by Andyorch
Paragraphs added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reply back to the dca that you do not acknowledge any debt to them or their clients and any legal action shall be defended vigorously. Check cag library for templates to be adapted and used.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for the speedy replies.

 

At the moment I have just been bin'ing the letters and ignoring the phone calls but it is getting a bit too much.

As such I am very uncomfortable about putting my head up above the parapet. So I will have to have a good think about this one.

 

Once again

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same as Royal Mail and customs duty

 

The admin fee will be for FedEx to pass the item through customs, a handling charge. It has nothing to do with the seller

 

£12.00 Admin is the same as Parcel Force charge, Royal Mail is £8.00

 

You need to think yourself lucky, the majority of other couriers charge up to £40.00 admn fee to pass the item through customs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi obiter dictum, Thanks for the reply.

 

Well I understand your view,

but it is not the amount,

it is that I cannot believe that it is legal for a company to demand payment from me for a service

that I did not know anything about bearing in mind that I have no contract with them for any service at all

as the contract is between the carrier and the seller,

and as I wrote originally who decides the amount?

 

 

As I have not been advised of any cost and given the option to decline

, it could be set to any number that they feel that they can get away with.

 

Once again thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is that you are liable for the £12.00 original FedEx fee

 

The DCA can go and swivel as their charges are unlawful

 

Pay the £12.00, swollow your pride and tell the DCA my response as to your charges are the same as in Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

 

http://www.nasw.org/users/nbauman/arkell.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi obiter dictum, Thanks for the reply.

 

Well I understand your view, but it is not the amount, it is that I cannot believe that it is legal for a company to demand payment from me for a service that I did not know anything about bearing in mind that I have no contract with them for any service at all as the contract is between the carrier and the seller, and as I wrote originally who decides the amount? As I have not been advised of any cost and given the option to decline, it could be set to any number that they feel that they can get away with.

 

Once again thanks

 

I also believe there is no legal obligation to pay their admin fees. No contract was agreed with them and therefore there is no legal liability to pay the admin fees.

 

IF they issue a court claim they will need to prove legal liability for the debt. As you did not create a contract and there is no LEGAL statute that grants them the power to bill you for a service not requested they should not be able to support their claim.

 

 

I have sent out an SOS for other site team input.

 

ALSO a DCA cannot take you to court for a debt they do not owe. It is a threatening letter, nothing more. They have the same right to take you to court as I do for that £12 (and any charges they imposed)

Edited by SabreSheep
last para added

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plenty of authority on contracts of carriage, would guess [without looking at the terms you agreed to] the contract was formed with the airway bill or bill of lading. Whether you understood what you agreed to or the ancillary charge for clearance is another matter entirely, as far as the business is concerned it had your authority to act on your behalf. If the information was witheld from you by the consignor your gripe should be with it not the agent acting on your instruction, perhaps the consignor will reimburse you the fee?

 

Can't say whether the fee is reasonable or not in the circumstances but if you feel that strongly about it don't pay it and move on. Seems commercial suicide to sue for £12.00 so I'd imagine it will send a few begging letters and give up, it certainly can't attack your credit files so there's relatively little it can do to pressurise payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For info please check the Companies Terms & Conditions mentioned in post#1 (Hobby)

 

As they state:

 

Do your listing prices include tax?

 

None of our product pricing includes tax and we do not charge taxes or extra fees on top of our advertised product price and shipping/handling.

 

However, it is your responsibility to pay any fees charged by your local customs or postal office, should they be incurred.

 

 

It also states in their T&C they are Governed by Hong Kong Law.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Thanks for the replies. Lots to think about so a bit confused. Also getting lots of heat from my wife to pay the money and move on!

 

I will let you know what the outcome is.

 

Regards

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't pay any admin fees to anyone.

 

 

and what you might owe

pay the courier directly

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I myself had this issue with FedEx in 2012

 

I left a rather expensive jacket in my hotel room in Vegas. It cost me £50.00 to get it back through FedEx

 

A month later i was hit with a supposed VAT and handling charge of about £35.00.

 

Strange as i purchased the jacket in the UK before i left and still had the original receipt. I eneded up with a letter before action from some pseudo solicitors.

 

At the end of the day i emailed the solicitor threatening them with a counter claim etc. They never responded and i was never contacted again.

 

I am still of the opinion you pay the £12.00 direct to FedEx and forget the extra collection charges. Do not give your debit card details, use a cheque or online banking. I stuck to my guns and they did capitulate, but they were trying to stuff me for both VAT and a handling charge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again there is no legal basis on which to force the OP to pay admin fees.

 

The contract is with the seller not the person receiving the parcel.

 

Legally the receiver of the parcels are responsible for VAT but NOT admin fees unless agreed with in advance.

 

Unless you can come up with a statutory instrument that gives the courier company legal right to create and enforce a contract on a a third party without consent, then advising them to pay this charge goes against CAGs aim of Consumer Protection.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that Sabresheep

 

This goes back to Royal Mail and their own customs handling charges.

These companies have been doing this for decades with no litigation through the courts, you have to ask yourself why??

 

I am looking at ths through logical eyes

 

They are asking for £12.00

 

Put that against putting in a court claim with no Guarantee of sucess

 

No one has explained why they canot charge these fees being a commercial operator that is probably buried deep in the small print

 

I am not saying it is right or fair, just peace of mind

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi obiter dictum,

 

Thanks for the heads up. I Have contacted Fedex and paid the £12 and got a confirmation number along with an email showing the account is now fully paid. However I did pay using my Card, so I am a bit concerned.

 

While chatting with the call centre operator she noticed that the account had been passed over to Control account and became a bit windy about accepting the payment. However, after a bit more chat by me, it all went through ok.

I must say that I am not happy but my wife is.

 

Hi SabreSheep,

 

Thanks once again for your input and if it was only me I would do as you suggest, but it is not. I still feel that it is not over yet as Control account are bound to fight on for their share, what ever that is.

I have however got my wife's backing in not paying them a penny. So as they say 'watch this space'.

 

Best regards and thanks

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sabresheep

 

I have used your comment in an official complaint direct to Victioria Embankment subject to the official complaints procedure. 56 Days now and counting backwards to bypass the usual corporate sensitive phone drones on this issue

 

I will update with a response when received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed I cannot find a single case where these couriers have taken a someone receiving a packet to court for ADMIN fees.

 

Mainly because there is no legal instrument to IMPOSE a contractual obligation on a third party without prior consent. They would not be able to prove their claim.

 

Now even if their company says T+Cs etc, that is irrelevant. The t+Cs apply only to the sender.

 

Think about it. Credit card company's say their T+Cs allow them to charge various administrative payments for going over limit or late payment. BUT they have 99% settled before court the cases taken against them. Just because a company or industry do something for decades and have it in their T+Cs, does not make it legal or lawful or enforceable.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that Sabresheep

 

They are asking for £12.00

 

Put that against putting in a court claim with no Guarantee of sucess

 

No one has explained why they canot charge these fees being a commercial operator that is probably buried deep in the small print

 

 

As already said, small print is not binding on a THIRD PARTY

 

Noone has explained why they CAN charge admin fees. And in court a debt owed has to be PROVED not disproved.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already said, small print is not binding on a THIRD PARTY

 

Noone has explained why they CAN charge admin fees. And in court a debt owed has to be PROVED not disproved.

 

Depends what the importer/consignee agreed to.

 

 

International conventions [CMR, Hague Visby etc] are a different animal to domestic carriage.

If the original poster on this thread was invited to contract carriage [which by his own account is the case]

including ancillary fees its a contract between the carrier and the consignee.

Not sure how productive a defence of 'I didn't read the T's & C's' would be.

 

 

If the consignor supplied the goods on ex works terms its a contract between the carrier and the consignee,

if the consignor supplied the goods on FCA terms its a contract between the carrier and the consignee.

Not sure why the rights of third parties would apply except perhaps in the event that the heads of sale/purchase were agreed on DDP terms.

 

To be frank, I think £12.00 is a reasonable price. I seem to remember that at one time Fedex charged import clearance and advancement [on deferment] as 2 separate fees but it now appears to have combined the 2 with no charge for the clearance. Its fees are published for ocassional importers and available on its website.

 

I'm all for not paying where no service is provided or where the fee appears penury but in the instance of clearing imports I'm pretty sure you'd have an uphill battle convincing any judge the charge was disproportionate.

 

As I said; if the op felt that strongly about it and had chosen not to pay I can't imagine any business pursuing a £12.00 fee in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...