Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EE and Buchanan Clark & Wells - advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening,

 

This is my first post and I hope that I have posted on the right forum.

 

In June this year I received a bill from EE for £527.26.

I telephoned EE and asked if I would be able to clear this large bill in installments. EE refused to set up a payment plan.

 

On 17th June I paid £80.00,

on 30th June 2015 I made a further payment of £60.00.

I made a payment of £50.00 on 10th July 2015 which reduced the balance to £337.26.

 

I contacted EE in July to ask for further time to clear the remaining £337.26.

The customer service agent again refused to set up a payment plan and got angry stating that he would be forwarding my details to a debt collection agency.

 

On 11th July a new bill was sent out for £396.34. £46.31 was the monthly plan charges and the balance of £337.26 from the previous month.

 

On16th July I received a formal demand from Buchanan Clark and Wells for £438.95.

 

I telephoned Buchanan Clark and Wells and explained that I was unable to pay the amount requested in one go and the customer service agent then went through my weekly/monthly outgoings and said that I was on a low income so get would get another department to get back to me. Nobody contacted me.

 

On 11th August a new bill was issued by EE for £444.30. £37.05 of that amount is the monthly plan charges.

Now I was confused.

 

EE were refusing to take further payments from me and had directed my account to Buchanan Clark & Wells for collection but EE are continuing to send bills. Who do I pay?

 

On 27th August Buchanan Clark & Wells sent a Notice of arrears Letter asking for £438.95.

 

I can't affiprd to pay that in one go.

Admin charges are also included.

 

I am willing to clear the total amount but would need to do in instalments.

I telephoned EE last night to see if they would allow me to make a payment and set up a payment plan and it got heated.

 

The telephone agent said EE had put a marker on my credit file and so have BCW.

 

The EE telephone agent said the default marker on my credit file would be marked as cleared after the total was paid in full.

 

The telephone conversation was heated and ended badly due to the EE telephone agents attitude.

 

Please advise me how to move forward.

I am willing to pay the amount requested but need to do so in installments due to other outgoings.

 

This is worrying me.

 

That is everything.

 

Thank you in advance for any advice you are willing to share.

 

worriedparent2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello & Welcome.

 

This is absolutely nothing to worry about, it is a tin pot moby phone debt, and they are lying to you.

 

STOP discussing anything with either of them over the phone, you MUST keep everything in writing.

 

If BCW ring, laugh and hang up, repeat the process, and keep a diary of events also, with a view of reporting

both outfits to the police for the criminal offence of harassment if they persist.

 

Do you OWN I&E, and DO NOT give them this info, as it is your personal I&E, not something for them to laugh at and then demand you pay money that you can't afford.

 

Start EE's complaints procedure and exhaust it, their employee lied to you by wrongly stating that once you had paid the default would be removed from your credit file, WRONG, once it is on there it stays for 6 years regardless of whether the debt is paid or not.

 

Slow down first and take stock of the situation, this is NOT a priority debt, as such, if needs be all it will attract is the legal token payment of £1 a month, and there is nothing they can do about it less for spitting their dummy out.

 

What paper work have you had from EE?

 

Have you had a default notice, giving you a specific date (dd/mm/yyyy) by which to rectify the account, before the terminate it?

 

Has the account been terminated?

If so then they are unable to add anything furter to it in the way of charges/fees and interest.

 

How long was the contract for?

 

EE's complaints address. http://ee.co.uk/help/safety-and-security/my-digital-life/ways-to-complain

Edited by Bazooka Boo
Added link

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly...

Stop talking. To no powers debt collectors on the phone!!

 

They are not baillifs

And have no such legal powers

Nor any legal remit to add anything to your bill.

 

So what is the package you have?

What do you pay ee for?

 

Your credit file is prob trashed already

So don't worry about that...

 

Pay what you can when you to ee

You don't have to gain anyone's 'permission!!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a budget sheet for you to fill in when you want, there is NO requirement for you

to give this information to anyone, it is for YOU to use.

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/steps/step2/Pages/Step_2_11.aspx

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly...

Stop talking. To no powers debt collectors on the phone!!

 

They are not baillifs

And have no such legal powers

Nor any legal remit to add anything to your bill.

 

So what is the package you have?

What do you pay ee for?

 

Your credit file is prob trashed already

So don't worry about that...

 

Pay what you can when you to ee

You don't have to gain anyone's 'permission!!!

 

Dx

 

Thank you for responding dx.

 

The bill relates to a tablet SIM card.

 

 

My son was using a lot of data and EE said it would be better if he had a mini tablet...

After much thought I agreed and the tablet was despatched.

 

 

All was fine for a few months and then my teenage son started playing up.

He had taken the SIM card out of the tablet and had put the sim in his phone and run up a large bill.

 

I knew that a large bill would be forming so I tried to get EE to disconnect the line.

 

 

EE refused to disconnect the line.

 

 

Strange because now they have terminated the line after a large bill has been run up.

 

 

I feel it could have been prevented.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for responding dx.

 

The bill relates to a tablet SIM card. My son was using a lot of data and EE said it would be better if he had a mini tablet... After much thought I agreed and the tablet was despatched. All was fine for a few months and then my teenage son started playing up. He had taken the SIM card out of the tablet and had put the sim in his phone and run up a large bill.

 

I knew that a large bill would be forming so I tried to get EE to disconnect the line. EE refused to disconnect the line. Strange because now they have terminated the line after a large bill has been run up. I feel it could have been prevented.

 

You could always argue unlawful use of the sim card..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...